Hisense E8Q vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

E8Q

Info

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: VIDAA

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.1

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.8

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.4

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    8.0

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    6.2

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    8.9

    7.0

  • Apps

    7.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.2

    6.5

Advantages

  • Great contrast and deep blacks

  • Very good smoothness of tonal transitions (close to reference level)

  • High brightness

  • Supports 4K 144 Hz and even 240 Hz in Full HD

  • VRR, ALLM, G-SYNC – a full package for gamers

  • Low input lag

  • Many classic TV features built into the VIDAA system

  • Very good contrast and black level: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Quite high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional gaming mode: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide selection of applications

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • No support for HGiG (makes setting HDR on consoles difficult)

  • Poor viewing angles – typical for VA panels

  • Closed VIDAA system – lack of some applications

  • Inferior sound quality compared to the twin model U7Q

  • The panel has heavy blooming

  • Strong visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor system errors

  • Lots of chaos in naming (many derivative models that are no different)

Our verdict

Hisense E8Q is a television that clearly draws heavily from the U7Q model – and that’s a great thing. After all, this is its European version, not another “slimmed down” mutation. After just a few moments with this screen, it’s clear that the E8Q is putting up a fight. And in many areas, it really succeeds. To start with – what impresses is that the blacks are deep, the contrast is high, and the brightness exceeds the threshold that we can simply call satisfactory. Add to that nearly perfect fluidity of tonal transitions, and we have an image that looks very mature, especially for this price segment. In gaming? Just as good. VRR, ALLM support, 144 Hz in 4K, and even 240 Hz in Full HD – it’s hard to find fault here. Well… almost. Because the E8Q has one additional flaw compared to the U7Q – the sound. In our unit, at moderate volume levels, the back of the cabinet began to resonate, producing rather unpleasant crackling noises. This might be a flaw of the test unit, but since the U7Q simply performed better – it’s worth noting. Especially if you find both models at a similar price. We can confidently state that the E8Q is a television that can confidently fight for the attention of those looking for a quality Mini-LED at reasonable prices. If a good price opportunity arises, it’s definitely worth it – because we receive almost the same as in the U7Q. And that means a really solid picture, excellent gaming features, and overall very good equipment that you can stick with for a while.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. And indeed, in many respects, it's a successful piece of equipment: thanks to the Mini-LED backlighting, we get good blacks and brightness that rivals more expensive models. In fact, it’s identical to that of the slightly pricier C6K, which we have already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich features for gamers, which make it enjoyable to play on, even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the good impression is marred by the performance of the panel used. The television struggles with noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital noise) makes the image often look unnatural and artificial – as if it has been unnaturally sharpened. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS is not its flaws but its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model is in a strange "in-between" position. It costs almost the same (or only slightly less) than the full-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete construction without those annoying issues. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition – if its price drops drastically. For now, the much safer and better choice remains to pay the (often nominal) extra for the C6K model. One could jokingly assert that the letter "S" in the name actually stands for "Slim". However, it's not about an exceptionally slim body, but how much this model has been "slimmed down" in terms of features compared to the fully-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.6/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 220 (10 x 22)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Hisense E8Q Contrast and black detail

Result

277,000:1

Review Hisense E8Q Contrast and black detail

Result

43,700:1

Review Hisense E8Q Contrast and black detail

Result

15,750:1

Review Hisense E8Q Contrast and black detail

Result

8,850:1

Review Hisense E8Q Contrast and black detail

Result

6,350:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Similar to the U7Q, the E8Q model uses a VA panel and Mini-LED backlighting. The number of dimming zones also remains at a very similar level – in the 65-inch variant we tested, we counted 220 zones, which is exactly the same as in the U7Q. On paper, it looks really good for this price segment, and even better – in practice. The contrast is high, and the black can be really deep. In many scenes, the lights are clearly separated, and the image gains a sense of space. This is one of those cases where Mini-LED shows it can come close to OLED quality – of course, assuming we understand the limitations we have to consider. In very challenging scenes, there may be slight brightening or a minor halo effect around bright objects, but these are phenomena typical of this technology and are not very noticeable. Ultimately – the contrast and blacks in the E8Q are really solid, nearly identical to the U7Q model. It's hard to nitpick, especially when we look at the price of the television.

Let's move on to what tigers like best, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) was due to drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black levels and contrast. In direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model is almost on par with it. Just like in the higher series, we find here a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. What’s most interesting – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones (in the same size) in the C6KS as in the more expensive counterpart! The black level is very good. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major flaws that often plague budget models without local dimming. Of course, we can't defy physics. One must reckon that in very demanding scenes (e.g., bright text on a black background), we may sometimes notice undesirable effects, such as blooming (the halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – generally, the black level here is at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

4.5/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.3%, Bt.2020: 71.9%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Hisense E8Q Brightness measurement

Result

531 nit

Review Hisense E8Q Brightness measurement

Result

148 nit

Review Hisense E8Q Brightness measurement

Result

320 nit

Review Hisense E8Q Brightness measurement

Result

100 nit

Review Hisense E8Q Brightness measurement

Result

625 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Hisense E8Q

Since the E8Q is a twin of the U7Q, it’s no surprise that the HDR effect quality is almost identical. On paper, it looks promising – a peak brightness of 800 nits can impress in many scenes. Moments like light flashes in “The Meg” or shots of the sun in “Life of Pi” can indeed create a “wow” effect. But the longer we watch, the more we notice the limitations. The problem arises when small, bright details need to be shown against a dark background. In such situations, the dimming algorithms try to protect the contrast, but in the process, they also dim what should shine the brightest. Instead of dazzling details, we get almost invisible points of light. This is typical for Mini-LED in this price segment and is not surprising – but it’s worth knowing that the HDR effect will not always be fully preserved. Fortunately, the colour reproduction provides reasons to be pleased. A coverage of the DCI-P3 palette of about 94% is a very good result, and the quantum dot layer used (more precisely, PFS) does its job – colours are saturated and vibrant, especially with 4K content.

And what about HDR? Here the C6KS performs quite well and – as is becoming the theme of this review – just like in the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect and generally, video materials look good here. However, it's important to keep in mind the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g. stars) appear on a dark background, the television can quite significantly dim them. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible black. It's a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, “true black” more than additional microscopic details, the display of which could cause the screen to appear greyed out. Such is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of this. It’s also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the QLED technology slogan. Thanks to this, the colours are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide colour gamut reaches as much as 92%.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Testing the Hisense E8Q in Filmmaker mode, we were hoping for a potentially neutral picture resembling the director's vision. Unfortunately – although it doesn't look too bad on paper (the colour reproduction errors aren't significant), in practice the image feels somewhat unnatural. The reason? The blue colour is boosted too strongly and there is a deficiency of red in the white balance. The effect? Scenes appear cool, and the white seems slightly bluish. Alongside the U7Q model, we also noticed a specific approach to brightness management here. The brightness reproduction curve for HDR content (EOTF) shows that the TV can significantly dim small, bright elements on the screen to maintain contrast – but sometimes it goes too far. On the other hand, it can excessively brighten larger, very bright areas, which disrupts tonal balance. It's a compromise that may not suit everyone – especially if you want a potentially faithful picture straight out of the box.

In contrast to the more expensive C6K model, in the tested C6KS we don't find an option in the menu labelled as Filmmaker Mode. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests showed that in practice, in terms of colour reproduction, the lack of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers an almost identical picture profile to the aforementioned Filmmaker in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. Therefore, if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K would give you better colours – the answer is: no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.4/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Calibration of the Movie mode yielded really good results, especially regarding SDR content. The white balance was successfully adjusted, giving the image a natural look – it appeared almost reference-level. The colours were well-saturated, and the overall experience of the content improved significantly. Unfortunately, when we switched to HDR materials, the familiar issues from the U7Q model returned. The TV still likes to "do its own thing," as seen from the analysis of the EOTF brightness characteristics – despite calibration, the E8Q still darkened small details in the shadows, while brighter parts of the screen were sometimes excessively boosted. In practice, this means that in darker scenes, some of the smallest details could simply disappear. Although it's worth noting that the entire calibration process brought a lot of good, not everything can be bypassed – even with the use of professional tools. The E8Q can impress with its picture, but in HDR content, its construction limitations become apparent, and it's worth keeping this in mind.

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the C69KS's tendency to distort colours has been effectively limited, leading to a very good final effect. After calibration, we will no longer see excessive warmth in SDR scenes or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it is worth noting the brightness characteristic. In SDR content, there are hardly any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, TV shows, or YouTube materials. Evaluating the television's performance in HDR is much more difficult. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behaviour, but its practical variant shows certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times it can dim the entire scene. Calibration has therefore brought clear benefits in terms of colour, but certain limitations resulting from local dimming and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be avoided, which we also observed in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.9/10

4.8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In this category, the Hisense E8Q really demonstrates its quality. The transitions between colours are very smooth, without any "steppings" or clear boundaries between tones. The image looks natural, and the colour gradation performs exceptionally well – even in more challenging scenes. If there are any minor imperfections, they are subtle enough not to be noticeable. It's hard to find fault here – it looks almost perfect.

When looking solely at the fluidity of tonal transitions, the C69KS provides no real reasons for complaint. The gradation of colours is appropriate, and more challenging sequences do not reveal any significant issues. However, you may be surprised by the low rating in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," which lead to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final rating is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

In the case of older materials of lower quality, gentle smoothing of tonal transitions often comes in handy. The Hisense E8Q, like the U7Q, has a "Smooth and Gradient Picture" feature, but unfortunately, its effectiveness leaves much to be desired. The "Low" setting is nearly invisible in operation, while higher settings blur details instead of improving transitions. The good news is that the feature does not compromise film grain, which means it does not degrade the structure of the image. On the positive side, scaling is commendable. The TV can reasonably convert older content to a higher resolution – without artificially accentuating contours or excessive sharpening. Although it doesn't match the best models in this category, it performs quite well for its class.

The C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p content looks surprisingly decent – a considerable amount of detail is preserved, and the algorithm adds a subtle ‘rounding’ effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. However, it doesn't perform as well when it comes to smoothing tonal transitions. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a rather raw state. With older materials, this can be simply exhausting, as the lack of additional processing highlights all imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.1/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
76%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K 120Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Similar to the U7Q, the E8Q model is a fast television designed with dynamic content in mind. It supports a 144 Hz refresh rate at 4K resolution, and if for some reason someone is still gaming in Full HD – it can even reach 240 Hz. This is a significant advantage, especially for PC users looking for maximum smoothness. In everyday use, the television performs very well. The “Ultra Motion Smoothness” mode gives us two sliders, allowing you to set the picture to your preference – whether it's more cinematic with the film frame preserved or highly smoothed, almost “TV show-like.” It's good that the manufacturer provides a choice here, instead of imposing one style. On sports material, live broadcasts, or in games – motion looks clean and stable. Sure, it’s not at the OLED level, but for this price range, the E8Q does a really good job.

C69KS offers a simplified motion enhancement panel in movies, allowing users to adjust the intensity of the effect using a slider. This makes it easy to tailor the smoothness to personal preferences. It also deserves credit for the ability to utilise higher refresh rates – even though the panel operates natively in 4K at 60 Hz, by lowering the resolution to 1440p, modes of 120 and 144 Hz can be enabled, on both consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, however, in practice, the image at these settings trails exceptionally badly. The effect is so pronounced that the overall experience simply appears mediocre and loses its appeal in everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.5/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Hisense E8Q does not hide its gaming pedigree. Just the specifications reveal that we are dealing with a television that will perform excellently as a gaming screen. Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)? It's there. Automatic Game Mode switching (ALLM)? That's there too. Additionally, there's impressive refreshment – 120 Hz in 4K or even 240 Hz in Full HD. Such a set is rare in this price segment. Everything runs smoothly and without major surprises. The only missing element – similar to the U7Q – remains support for HGiG. It's a shame because this feature facilitates adjusting the brightness curve to the capabilities of the specific television, enhancing visual fidelity with the intentions of HDR game developers. Without it, manual tweaking of the settings is necessary, which does not always yield a satisfying result.

If we overlook the smudging and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS is impressive in how well it performs for gaming. You get everything you would expect from a gaming TV: Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a consistently functioning HGiG. The TV can also operate at 120 or even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, making gameplay on console or PC smoother. Additionally, there's a clear Game Bar that allows you to quickly check key settings while gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a genuinely successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

9.7/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
18 ms
9 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
18 ms
9 ms
2160p120
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
9 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
27 ms
9 ms
2160p120 DV
19 ms

The E8Q handles delays very well. For 120 Hz content, the input lag is super low – practically imperceptible even for more demanding players. At 60 Hz, the values are slightly higher, but still comfortably within the "placebo" range – there's nothing to complain about. The biggest increase in latency was noted in Dolby Vision Gaming mode. The TV needs more time to process the signal then, but even in this scenario, it doesn't exceed 30 ms. These may not be ideal values, but for most players – especially console gamers – it won't be a problem.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, which means responses in games are instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
9ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

In terms of collaboration with the computer, the E8Q performs really well. It supports chroma 4:4:4 at full 4K resolution and the highest refresh rates, so the readability of fonts – even the smallest ones – is at a very good level. There are slight blurriness issues with exceptionally thin fonts, but in everyday use, it's hard to consider this a serious problem. A nice addition for PC gamers is the ability to achieve up to 288 Hz at lower resolutions. The E8Q communicates effortlessly with powerful graphics cards, making it an interesting choice not only for movies or consoles but also for gaming on the computer.

Aside from the previously mentioned ability to work at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor — the darkest ones have a distinct, rainbow halo, and the standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that prolonged work at the computer can be simply tiring.

Viewing angles

3/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
79%
80%

E8Q, like most TVs with a VA panel, looks best when we're sitting directly in front of the screen. In this position, you can expect deep blacks, good colour saturation, and high contrast. Unfortunately, just shifting a little to the side causes the picture quality to drop – colours start to fade, and blacks become more grey than black. It's not surprising, but it's worth keeping in mind, especially if we plan to watch with a larger group from different spots in the lounge. On the bright side – in return, we get significantly better black levels than in IPS panels.

The viewing angles in the C6KS are very poor, typical of VA panels. It’s a compromise we pay for by choosing high contrast — head-on, the image looks good, but any significant deviation quickly causes drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

6.2/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

Hisense E8Q: 504 cd/m2

Hisense E8Q isn't afraid of bright interiors. Even when the sun is shining outside, the television can maintain good image readability. With a brightness level of around 500 nits, you can comfortably watch content during the day without feeling like everything is drowning in glare. The satin screen coating also helps to nicely minimise reflections – it doesn't completely eliminate them, but reduces them enough that they don't interfere with everyday viewing.

The C6KS performs really well as a TV screen for daytime viewing. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits easily cuts through challenging lighting conditions. Additionally, it features a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections. As a result, the TV impresses during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
V0000.09.01T.P0523
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Hisense E8Q TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

Hisense E8Q

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

TV features

8.9/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Hisense E8Q TV features
Review Hisense E8Q TV features
Review Hisense E8Q TV features
Review Hisense E8Q TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

Classic Features – E8Q

The Hisense E8Q is not just equipment for gamers or movie enthusiasts – it can also serve as an everyday TV for the whole family. We can record programs to USB, connect headphones or speakers via Bluetooth, and the entire interface – including the channel guide – is clear and easy to use. It only lacks a PiP function, but besides that, the set of classic features is really complete.

Smart TV – VIDAA System

The E8Q runs on the VIDAA system, which is becoming more refined every year. Voice search in Polish works flawlessly, and it's easy to stream content from a phone (AirPlay and screen mirroring). The system itself operates smoothly, without hiccups, although – as is often the case with closed platforms – there may be one or two less popular apps missing. It’s worth checking before purchase whether it has everything we use daily.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It's an environment that offers a lot — ideal for those who value a wide selection of apps and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing functionality, and the voice assistant work very well here, making daily use of the television simply convenient.

The support for traditional television is somewhat lacking. Users who are counting on extensive "TV" features may feel overlooked. Besides the smoothly functioning Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Apps

7.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
Yes
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the E8Q performs quite well. It supports most popular video and audio formats, and files from USB drives or external disks play without major issues. Polish characters? They're supported. Subtitles? They work. The only minor drawback is the occasional problem with displaying high-resolution images – especially those from cameras or smartphones. So if you're planning to show holiday photos on the big screen, it’s worth checking beforehand that they all load correctly from the memory of the disk or USB drive.

The system player really does a great job and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hiccup appears with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g., HEIC) – here TCL just gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own app, e.g., VLC. This way, you can quickly patch up the shortcomings of the factory player and play practically any material, customizing the TV to your needs.

Sound

7.2/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    85dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Here unfortunately, the Hisense E8Q didn’t make the best impression on us. Although on paper it has speakers with a power of 40 W (which is just a bit less than 50 W in the U7Q), in practice the difference is significant – and unfortunately not in favour of the E8Q. During testing, it quickly became clear that something wasn’t right. When the volume was turned up above 40–50%, the entire back casing began to resonate, and unpleasant crackling sounds emitted from the TV. Even during regular viewing, it was hard not to notice this, and definitely hard not to hear. In this form, it’s difficult to talk about listening comfort. We don’t rule out that it was a problem with a specific test unit, but still – it’s worth keeping this in mind. If you care about good sound, consider connecting a soundbar or… go for the U7Q, which definitely performs better.

The TCL C6KS performs almost identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same speaker set branded by Onkyo. For a TV of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even feel a slightly defined bass, which is not common in the budget segments. However, it's worth keeping the proper perspective in mind. This bass is decent compared to other TVs, but a home theatre system or even a basic soundbar will offer a much fuller, more dynamic sound. The C6KS will therefore be suitable for regular TV viewing, but if someone is after a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be the natural choice.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

85dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data