Haier M90E vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Haier M90E is a television that doesn’t lack brightness. In most film scenes, peak luminance exceeds 1000 nits, which gives the image a distinct "punch" and high dynamics. This performs really well with typical bright HDR material. However, one must take into account the previously mentioned dimming algorithm. In scenes that are not evenly flooded with light – for example, when displaying individual stars on a black sky – the high brightness highlights the shortcomings of zone control. Instead of a precise light point, we often see a distinct halo effect around bright objects. Despite these drawbacks, the overall presentation of the image can be pleasing, thanks in large part to the colour reproduction. The manufacturer has applied a PFS phosphor coating, which allows for wide coverage of the colour palette. In our measurements, the coverage of the DCI-P3 space reached a solid 95%.

If you're hoping that HDR on the NANO81A will bring tears to your eyes, I have to disappoint you. This TV is just too dark to show what this format is really about. With a brightness of only 250 nits, HDR really only exists on paper here. In practice, during viewing, it's very hard to tell whether we're watching material in high dynamic range or regular SDR – it simply lacks that “punch” of light in the bright parts of the image. But, to balance out the criticism, we do have one light at the end of the tunnel – and quite a distinct one at that. It's about colour gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it's not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. That's a really solid result, placing this model significantly above typical budget models based on regular white LEDs without any filters. Of course, it still lags a bit behind QLED TVs or advanced panels with PFS filters, but for this price range, the colours are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It’s just a shame that this low brightness doesn't allow them to fully “spread their wings” with the Nano filter.

For the measurements, we chose the Film mode, which is supposed to provide an image closest to the intentions of the creators. Unfortunately, in the case of the M90E, its characteristics – besides the reduced brightness – differ little from the Dynamic mode. In both SDR and HDR materials, the image is noticeably tinged with a cool blue hue. The white balance is heavily skewed towards blue, reminiscent of typical, aggressive "store" settings. This results in unnatural skin tone reproduction and makes the image tiring to the eyes during longer viewing sessions. The way brightness is managed also negatively impacts colour fidelity. The TV struggles to maintain proper levels – small details are often too dim, while larger, bright areas of the image become overexposed. These deviations in the brightness curve, combined with the cool white balance, lead to very large colour reproduction errors (DeltaE) in the factory settings.

For every film fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. It is designed to show the image as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements". Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left a bit to be desired. The main issue turned out to be the white balance. Measurements revealed a distinct deficiency of blue, which in practice meant that many scenes had a slightly yellowish, even "yellowed" tint. The white wasn’t perfectly clean, which took away the freshness of the image. Additionally, the brightness management wasn't perfect either – the factory-set gamma was too low. The image often appeared oversaturated, as if it had been pulled too much from the shadows, which detracted from its naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price range, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration options for this model are extensive, which is a significant plus for those who enjoy "fiddling" in the menu. We decided to approach the matter our way and see how much we could squeeze out of this panel with professional calibration.

Haier M90E clearly improves after undergoing professional calibration, especially for SDR content. The television's menu offers a sufficient number of tools to effectively correct factory errors. We managed to "tame" the white balance and eliminate the dominant blue glow. We also adjusted, albeit to a lesser extent, the gamma curve, which allowed us to recover some details in the shadows that were too heavily dimmed in the factory settings. The final effect in SDR is a significantly more natural and pleasing image. In HDR mode, the success is only partial. While we managed to improve the white balance here too, color reproduction errors (Color Checker) remained at a high level. Analysis of the EOTF curve (responsible for brightness in HDR) points to the cause of the problem: the television imposes its own interpretation of the signal and does not provide tools to modify this curve. The source of high errors is not the calibration itself, but the specificity of the device – aggressive and imprecise zone dimming interferes with measurements and is "stiffly" embedded in the characteristics of this model.

After calibration, the NANO81A is a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools, even in such an affordable model, deserves major credit. We were able to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colours natural, vibrant, and simply "real". In SDR content (i.e., regular television, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks miles better – it’s clean, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It’s clear that this panel has significant potential, which is simply wasted out of the box due to poor presets. However, we have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it's about brightness management in HDR mode. The LG algorithm in this model is very conservative. The TV deliberately dims the HDR image to avoid clipping the already weak blacks of the IPS panel. The developers faced a choice: either provide more light and accept that black would become light grey, or dial down the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Despite this, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is considerably better.

The evaluation of the image processor must be divided into two distinct aspects, as the Haier M90E behaves inconsistently here. The first issue is the upscaling itself, which is the process of scaling lower resolution content to 4K. In this task, the television performs quite decently. The algorithms effectively enhance detail, making the final image relatively sharp, clear, and readable. In this respect, it’s hard to have major complaints about the device.

The situation is completely different with materials that have a high degree of compression, which we encounter in older recordings or on platforms like YouTube with a lower bitrate. Here, the processor struggles with smoothing tonal transitions and masking the imperfections of the source. The television fails to hide compression blocks, resulting in a very harsh, "digital" character of the image. The lack of effective artifact reduction can certainly deter viewers from watching lower quality content on this screen.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels ruthlessly expose all the "dirty laundry" and imperfections in lower resolution materials. However, with the LG NANO81A, the situation is completely different. It's a really solid performer when it comes to handling content that's far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A big plus is the gradation reduction feature, which you can find in the settings. It is exceptionally effective in combating colour banding, which is a godsend when watching low bitrate materials, such as from some streaming services or older files from the web. However, it is worth maintaining a certain vigilance. Since we are dealing with a less powerful chip than in LG's top models, too aggressive a setting for this option can sometimes result in minor artifacts or slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimentation with this feature – in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Haier M90E is equipped with a simple yet functional motion smoothing system (MEMC). In the settings menu, users will find a three-level adjustment scale: low, medium, and high. This allows for adjusting the level of intervention in the image to personal preferences – from gentle smoothing of 24p films to maximum fluidity (soap opera effect). The system operates stably and fulfills its purpose in typical applications.

In terms of motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a bit of a hurdle. The television is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60Hz. If you're looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast-paced action games, you might feel somewhat dissatisfied. With such a low native refresh rate, fast objects on the screen will always be a bit blurry.

From a hardware perspective, the Haier M90E is a solid offering. The television is equipped with two full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, which ensure support for key technologies: VRR (variable refresh rate) and ALLM (auto low latency mode). Another plus is the correct implementation of Dolby Vision for gaming, which maintains a relatively low input lag. Problems arise with the software configuration. The biggest drawback is the forced, continuous dynamic tone mapping by the television's processor. This prevents proper HDR calibration from the console using system panels (HGiG) – the television ignores source settings and processes the image in its own way. We also noted deficiencies in the interface: the M90E does not have a typical "Game Bar" (overlay with parameters), which is standard among competitors. Cooperation with Xbox consoles has also proven problematic with atypical parameters – the device struggles to properly display 1440p resolution at 120 Hz refresh rate. Despite the aforementioned software shortcomings, the Haier M90E remains a very attractive screen for gamers. The final reception is saved by a solid hardware foundation. Native refresh rate of 144 Hz and the presence of full-featured HDMI 2.1 ports are advantages that are crucial in everyday use. If we are looking for a television that provides high fluency and supports 4K signal, this model will do its job.

NANO81A is unfortunately not a device designed with esports in mind. The lack of 120 Hz signal support is a fact that users planning to purchase this model simply have to accept. Nevertheless, LG’s engineers have worked hard to squeeze the maximum potential from this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely improve gaming comfort. First and foremost, the television supports VRR technology (in the range of 48–60 Hz) and ALLM. This ensures that the image remains stable and does not "tear," and the device automatically switches to low latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from a console. Managing these settings is extremely simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay that allows for a quick preview of parameters without leaving the game. A very significant advantage is support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles, as it allows the television to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown-out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which is unfortunately a common issue in budget LCD televisions.