Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED)
$1 299

S85F / FAE / FAU / S84F

Info

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: QD-OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.1

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.4

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    9.2

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.9

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    9.6

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.6

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    5.1

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    7.0

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.2

    6.5

Advantages

  • Amazing black and contrast

  • Incredible color palette coverage thanks to the QD-OLED panel

  • Great picture in SDR and HDR content

  • High color fidelity after calibration

  • Very good image smoothness – 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of features for gamers: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps

  • Advanced and smoothly operating Tizen system

  • Solar Remote with multiple capabilities

  • Very good contrast and black: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Pretty high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional mode for gamers: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide range of applications

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from the built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • No USB recording function and PiP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Slight cherry black under very strong external light (not visible during viewing in cinematic conditions)

  • The matrix is heavily smudged

  • Strong visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor system errors

  • Significant chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

Our verdict

Samsung S85F with a QD-OLED panel can be surprising – and surprisingly positively so. Before the tests, we didn't think that in the case of televisions, which are often referred to in the context of "panel lottery," one could come across something beneficial for users. Yet, in this case, especially in the 55-inch version, it fully succeeded. The QD-OLED panel, as is fitting for organic technology, offers nearly perfect black and contrast in cinematic conditions. However, the difference lies in the way colors are reproduced – here it is simply outstanding. The color gamut coverage is impressive, and after slight calibration, the colors become almost exemplary. Motion smoothness is equally high. The 120 Hz panel handles both sports and action movies exceptionally well. And if someone plans to connect a console to the S85F, they will receive a full set of advantages: low input lag, variable refresh rate, Game Bar, and full HDMI 2.1 support. In daily use, we were assisted by the Tizen system – closed, but incredibly refined. It responds quickly, offers a rich selection of applications, and features such as AirPlay and voice control make it hard to find something more complete in this category. Indeed, the S85F is not without its flaws. However, the balance of advantages and disadvantages is exceptionally favorable here. One could even get the impression that this is one of the best televisions in its price segment.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. And indeed, in many ways it's a successful piece of equipment: thanks to Mini-LED backlighting, we get good black levels and brightness that rivals more expensive models. In fact, it's identical to the slightly more expensive C6K model, which we've already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich gaming features, making it enjoyable to play even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the positive impression is marred by the performance of the panel used. The television suffers from noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital grain) makes the image often appear unnatural and artificial—as if it were being forced to be sharper. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS isn’t its flaws, but rather its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model finds itself in a strange "middle ground." It costs almost the same (or just slightly less) as the full-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete design without those annoying flaws. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition—if its price drops drastically. For now, opting for the (often symbolic) additional cost to the C6K model remains a much safer and better choice. One could mischievously state that the letter "S" in the name actually stands for "Slim." It's just that it's not about an exceptionally slim case, but about how much this model has been "slimmed down" in terms of capabilities compared to the full-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Base adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The Samsung S85F in the 55-inch version has something exceptional – it features a QD-OLED panel. This sounds quite surprising, but that’s the fact, at least in Poland. So the question arises: is the difference from last year's S85D with a WOLED panel even noticeable? Yes, although in this particular test – black levels and contrast – it practically makes no difference.

Regardless of the scene, the S85F delivers infinite contrast and perfect black levels that we expect from any OLED. These results can amaze even the most demanding movie enthusiasts. It’s worth noting that such deep blacks can only be offered by televisions with organic panels – and it doesn’t matter whether it’s WOLED or QD-OLED. So, if you dream of a screen that can "turn off" the light in a scene as effectively as an independent cinema in a dark room, the S85F is one of those televisions.

Let's move on to what tigers like best, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) was due to drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black levels and contrast. In direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model hardly falls short at all. Just like in the higher series, we find a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. What’s most interesting – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests, we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones in the C6KS (of the same size) as in the tested more expensive counterpart! The black levels are very good. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major issues that often plague budget models without local dimming. Of course, we can't cheat physics. We must expect that in very demanding scenes (e.g., bright text on a black background), we will sometimes notice undesirable effects such as blooming (halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – overall, the black levels are at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

6.2/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 100.0%, Bt.2020: 86.2%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

666 nit

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

703 nit

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

742 nit

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

732 nit

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

433 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED)

As an OLED, the Samsung S85F can really shine – literally. Under favorable conditions, it can generate brightness exceeding 750 nits. This is hugely significant because most movies are created with displays around 1000 nits in mind. In practice, this means that in scenes with moderately large bright elements, the image can look simply fantastic. However, it's not always so rosy. When there is a massive amount of light on the screen – whether it's a vast bright background or an entire screen filled with white – the S85F must tone it down. The brightness can drop by even four times in such scenes. This limitation is known to basically every OLED in this price range, so we don't consider it a particular failing. However, something that deserves praise is what sets this model apart from the competition – color gamut coverage. Thanks to the QD-OLED panel, our colorimeter showed values exceeding 100% DCI-P3 coverage and as high as 86% for the ultra-wide BT.2020 palette. Such results are hard to find even in televisions that cost several times more.

And how does the issue of HDR look? Here the C6KS performs quite well and – as is becoming a recurring theme in this review – identically to the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect, and generally, the video materials look good here. However, one must remember the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g., stars) appear against a dark background, the television can dim them quite significantly. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible black levels. It’s a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, “true black” more than additional micro-details that could cause grayness on the screen. Such is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of it. It’s also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the tagline of QLED technology. Thanks to this, the colors are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide color gamut reaches 92% here.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Samsung, as befits a manufacturer with ambitions, equipped the S85F with a mode called Filmmaker. Its task is simple: to make the colors on the newly purchased television as true to what the director wanted us to see as possible. Sounds great… but, as often happens, a great-sounding theory doesn’t always translate into perfect practice.

In the tested unit, it quickly became apparent that the image – due to an excess of blue and red – looked as if someone had overdone the saturation a bit. As a result, quite significant color errors appeared, particularly in 4K content. To make matters worse, there was a brightness issue – the S85F could brighten most scenes more than it should, taking away their intended mood.

Fortunately, Samsung televisions, including the S85F, offer an impressive number of settings for advanced calibrators. This means we could check what this panel is truly capable of when it gets into the right hands.

Unlike the more expensive C6K model, the tested C6KS does not have an option labeled Filmmaker Mode in the menu. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests have shown that in practice, in terms of color reproduction, the absence of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers nearly identical picture characteristics to the aforementioned Filmmaker mode in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. So if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K gives you better colors – the answer is: no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.3/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Thanks to the vast number of settings in the menu, we managed to bring the S85F almost to perfection. White balance in SDR content? Literally perfect – deviations do not exceed a value of "1". Thus, it can be confidently said that in materials with not very high dynamics, we have an image close to reference.

In HDR content, minor issues did arise, but they are of little significance in practice – most errors fall below the threshold of perception, which is a value of "3". We also managed to tame the S85F regarding brightness management – the EOTF curve, even in films, adheres to an almost perfect line. This is one of those cases where after calibration, you can comfortably forget about the settings and simply enjoy movies and series at the highest level.

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the tendency of the C69KS to distort colors has been effectively reduced, leading to a very good final effect. After calibration, we won't see excessive warmth in SDR scenes or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it's worth noting the brightness characteristic. In SDR content, there are hardly any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, television programs, or materials from YouTube. It is much more difficult to evaluate the performance of the television in HDR. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behavior, but its practical variant shows certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times it can dim the entire scene. Calibration has therefore brought clear benefits in terms of color reproduction, but certain limitations arising from the operation of local dimming and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be avoided, as we also saw in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.5/10

4.8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Thanks to the QD-OLED panel, the color blending on the S85F performs really well. It's especially worth noting how it handles the darkest, most demanding scenes – where most televisions start to struggle, this model works almost perfectly.

Interestingly, a minor stumble can be noticed in those easier, brighter shots. There is a slight banding of colors, but it's so subtle that it's hard to believe it would actually bother anyone while watching.

Looking solely at the smoothness of tonal transitions, the C69KS gives no real reason for complaints. The gradation of colors proceeds correctly, and more challenging sequences do not reveal significant problems. Therefore, you might be surprised by the low score in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," leading to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final score is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The tone transition smoothing feature in the S85F works really well – it can completely eliminate the problem of visible bands in very poor quality materials, even from YouTube. Unfortunately, even the lowest level of this option comes with compromises. Noise reduction is aggressive enough that it can smooth out film grain, which many of us consider an element of the cinematic atmosphere. At the "Standard" level, we did not notice that this feature removed anything significant from the image, so we can recommend this setting. On the other hand, the "High" level is a different story – it can smooth not only noise but also fine, desirable details such as the texture of objects.

When it comes to image scaling, the S85F performs very well. The material looks sharp, and the only minor imperfection is slightly visible contour jaggedness. And there’s the ongoing issue with Samsung televisions – overscan. This can cause some scenes to have their frames slightly trimmed, which is worth keeping in mind when watching very old content.

C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p material looks surprisingly decent – a significant amount of detail is preserved, and the algorithm adds a subtle "rounding" effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. However, the smoothing of tonal transitions is lacking. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a somewhat raw state. With older materials, this can be simply exhausting, as the lack of additional processing highlights all imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
47%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@60Hz Game Motion Plus):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

S85F is a hellishly fast television – and this is not just an empty catchphrase for effect. Thanks to the 120 Hz OLED panel, dynamic scenes, whether in games or while watching a live match, look exactly as they should – smoothly, sharply, and without the feeling that something is "escaping" from the frame. The lightning-fast pixel response time, typical of OLEDs, plays a crucial role here. Transitions between frames are practically instantaneous, and the image remains clear even during the fastest camera movements. A ball flying across half the field? A car racing in a chase scene? Everything here is clear and free of the characteristic "trail" found in LCDs.

This is exactly what we expect from a good OLED – zero compromises in motion fluidity. The S85F gives the feeling that regardless of the pace of the action, we can focus on what is happening on the screen, rather than on the imperfections of the image.

C69KS offers a simplified motion improvement panel in movies, allowing you to adjust the intensity of the effect using a slider. This makes it easy to match the smoothness to your own preferences. The possibility of using higher refresh rates is also a plus – even though the panel operates natively at 4K at 60 Hz, lowering the resolution to 1440p allows you to enable 120 and 144 Hz modes, both on consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, but in practice, the image at these settings suffers from significant motion blur. The effect is noticeable enough that the overall experience feels simply mediocre and loses its appeal in everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

The S85F has practically everything it needs to become the dream screen for gaming. Four fully-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, support for VRR, ALLM, a super-detailed Game Bar that clearly shows all parameters – and on top of that, a gem in the form of Game Motion Plus. This is a motion interpolator that makes animation in games more enjoyable, with only a slight increase in input lag. This is a rare combination, and Samsung deserves a big plus for it. Now comes the moment where we have to complain a bit. The lack of Dolby Vision in Samsung TVs is already standard, so there's no point in hoping (unless something changes in a few years) – but the disappearance of HGiG after the software update is something that’s hard to explain. HGiG (which stands for HDR Gaming Interest Group) is a mode that allows for precise reproduction of brightness in HDR games, according to the creators' intention. Without it, HDR calibration on the console becomes less precise, so we might end up with an image that's too dark in the shadows or overly bright. Perhaps Samsung will fix this in the next update – and we have high hopes for that. Because if HGiG returns, the S85F will become almost the perfect TV for gamers.

If we overlook the smearing and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS impresses with how well it performs during gaming. We get everything you can expect from a gaming television: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a reasonably functioning HGiG. The TV can also operate at 120 and even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, allowing for smoother gameplay on console or PC. Additionally, there is a clear Game Bar that lets you quickly glance at key settings during gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a truly successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
9 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
10 ms
9 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
9 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
9 ms
2160p120 DV

Here, dear gamers, the S85F shows its claws. 5 ms with 120 Hz content and about 10 ms with 60 Hz are results that can be described in one word in the world of televisions – phenomenal. This means that the response to our movements is practically instantaneous. We press the button, and the action on the screen happens without any delay, as if the television were reading our minds. In dynamic games, where a fraction of a second can determine victory or defeat, such values make a huge difference. There is no question of a nervous "wait" for the image to catch up with our movements. The S85F gives us the feeling that everything is under our complete control – and that's how it should be with equipment that aspires to be the ideal screen for gamers.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, which makes reactions in games instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

7.6/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

If you plan to connect the S85F to a computer, we have good news – this television is perfect for that. Low input lag and a 120 Hz panel make gaming on a PC pure pleasure. Whether we're talking about dynamic shooters or calmer RPGs, the response is instantaneous, and the fluidity of animations can keep you engaged for hours.

Of course, there’s no rose without thorns. Due to the diamond pixel arrangement in the QD-OLED panel, there is a slight “rainbow icon” effect, particularly noticeable when sitting close to the screen. Fortunately, this is more of a detail that most of you won’t mind in everyday use. Especially since, thanks to the proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, the readability of fonts is at a very good level – documents, websites, and text editors look just as they should.

Besides the previously mentioned option of operating at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor—the darkest ones have a distinct rainbow glow, and standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that extended work at the computer can be simply exhausting.

Viewing angles

9.8/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
11%
80%

Here, dear readers, the S85F reaches absolute heights. The viewing angles are phenomenal – some of the best you can get in a television today, thanks to the unique QD-OLED panel from Samsung Display. Of course, WOLED panels can also maintain a high standard in this regard, but let's not kid ourselves – what QD-OLED shows in the S85F is even more impressive. Colors, contrast, and brightness remain practically unchanged even when watching the screen from a very large angle. This is the kind of television where you don't have to fight for the "best spot on the couch" – everyone will see the picture in all its glory, no matter where they sit.

The viewing angles in C6KS are very poor, typical of VA panels. This is a compromise we pay for by choosing high contrast — the image looks good head-on, but any significant deviation quickly results in drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

5.1/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Good
Black levels during daytime
Average
Very Good

Panel brightness

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED): 317 cd/m2

We really liked the saying "there's no rose without thorns," and it perfectly fits the QD-OLED TVs. Especially when we take a look at their performance in heavily sunlit conditions. As you may notice, in very bright light, the panel's surface can take on a slightly cherry hue. The effect is subtle in the case of the S85F, but in extreme lighting conditions, black can perform a bit worse than in WOLED panels. But - and this "but" is key here - QD-OLED significantly better suppresses direct reflections of light. This means that reflections will be less bothersome, and the image will maintain clarity even when something bright reflects off the screen. You gain some, you lose some.

When it comes to brightness, the S85F is a moderately bright OLED. It's not a model made for extremely sunlit living rooms. If you plan to place it in a very bright room, we recommend considering shades or positioning it in a place that provides at least some protection from direct light.

C6KS performs really well as a TV viewing screen during the day. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits easily cuts through challenging lighting conditions. In addition, there is a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections. As a result, the television surprisingly holds up well during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1110.7
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED)

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

TV features

7.3/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

Features of the Classic S85F TV

The S85F was not really designed with fans of classic television in mind. We won’t find PiP functionality here (which is a bit surprising, because Samsung usually offers it) nor the ability to record programs to USB from the built-in tuners. Fortunately, the basics are present – teletext and a clear channel guide – so this is more than enough for regular, everyday viewing. The included remote, although simple at first glance and lacking a numeric keypad, allows for the control of multiple devices. This means that when connecting, for example, a Canal+ decoder, you don’t need to have two remotes on the table – the one from the television is sufficient.

SmartTV S85F: Tizen

The smart part is a completely different story. Tizen is one of the most advanced operating systems in televisions. It works efficiently, supports all popular internet functions – from screen mirroring, through AirPlay, to voice search. The strongest aspect of Tizen is its integration with the SmartThings app, which can act as a control center for the entire home. Of course, like any closed system, Tizen has its limitations – for instance, a smaller application library compared to GoogleTV. However, looking at the current list of available applications, it’s hard to pinpoint anything that might actually be lacking.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It is an environment that offers a lot—ideal for those who prioritize a wide selection of applications and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing, and voice assistant features work very well here, making everyday use of the television simply convenient.

The support for traditional television is somewhat lacking. Users who expect extensive "TV" features may feel overlooked. Besides the efficiently working Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the S85F performs excellently – almost everything you plug into a USB drive or disk will be played back without any issues. Minor gaps occur only with the support for some less common photo formats, but for the vast majority of you, this will be more than sufficient. So it can be confidently said that for home use, the built-in player is more than solid.

The system player really delivers and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hiccup occurs with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g., HEIC) – here, TCL simply gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own application, such as VLC. This way, you can quickly address the shortcomings of the factory player, allowing you to play practically any material, customizing the TV to your preferences.

Sound

7.2/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    80dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Built-in speakers with a power of 20 W on paper may not make a big impression, but in practice, the S85F can surprise. It sounds really pleasant, and at times, you can even catch a hint of bass, which is not a given in this class of speakers. The television does not support the DTS format, which unfortunately has become the standard for most manufacturers by 2025. A nice surprise, however, is the support for Dolby Atmos. Of course, talking about "spatial" sound in the case of two speakers placed at the bottom of the casing would be a bit of an exaggeration, but it's good that Samsung offers such a feature in this model at all.

TCL C6KS performs almost identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same set of speakers branded by Onkyo. For a television of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even sense a slightly defined bass, which is not often found in budget segments. However, it is worth remembering the proper perspective. This bass performs decently against other televisions, but a home theater setup or even a basic soundbar will still offer a much fuller, more dynamic sound. Therefore, the C6KS is suitable for regular television watching, but if someone is keen on a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be a natural choice.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

80dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data