Philips PUS8500 vs Samsung U8000F (VA)

Direct compare

Check the best price offer:

Samsung U8000F (VA)
$314

PUS8500 / PUS8560 / PUS8510 / PUS8600

Info

U8000F / U8092F

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.6

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.2

    5.9

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.2

    5.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.7

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    3.8

  • Utility functions

    4.7

    5.5

  • Apps

    4.6

    8.7

  • Sound quality

    6.2

    5.7

Advantages

  • Ambilight TV System

  • High native contrast - VA panel

  • Low input lag

  • Basic features for gamers: ALLM and VRR

  • Full support for audio formats: Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Backlit remote controler with numeric keypad

  • Nice black and contrast (VA panel version)

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Great for working with text - displays fonts very well

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Low input lag

Disadvantages

No like
  • Average panel brightness

  • TitanOS system feels unfinished (some features do not work, gaps in applications)

  • Infrared remote control

  • Font readability issues (PC)

  • Low brightness

  • Worse viewing angles compared to the IPS matrix version (Obvious, isn't it? 😉)

  • Infrared remote control

  • Worse appearance than its predecessor

Our verdict

Ambilight because that's where we have to start, it's the biggest reason to buy the PUS8500. The three-sided backlighting of the TV looks great, especially in the evening. It creates an atmosphere, masks the imperfections of contrast, and makes the viewing experience simply more enjoyable. Even if the black levels aren't perfect, the native VA panel's high contrast is just fine. On top of that, there's really decent input lag and several gaming features like ALLM and VRR. Although there’s no HDMI 2.1 or 120Hz panel, casual gaming should be a pleasure. Especially since it's responsive and latency-free. Additionally, there’s full support for audio formats – both Dolby Atmos and DTS, so soundbar owners can rejoice too.

But let's not kid ourselves – this is still a budget TV, and at times it shows. Brightness is average – not weak enough to make viewing impossible, but if you hit a particularly sunny day, watching conditions without blinds can be problematic. However, in our opinion, the biggest disappointment with the PUS8560 is the operating system, Titan OS. Despite the system debuting some time ago, certain features simply wouldn't work – for example, screen mirroring from a phone despite the manufacturer's claims that such a feature is present here. There are fewer apps than with competitors, and the system itself runs a bit clumsily. Overall, it seems to have some capabilities, but clearly lacks refinement.

Of course, this is not a TV meant to compete with top models. But if someone is looking for something simple, with a nice atmosphere that the Ambilight system provides, it is a quite reasonable offer. You just need to know what to expect and accept the many compromises present here.

Samsung U8000F with a VA panel is a television that can pleasantly surprise in its class – of course, if we know what to expect from it. Its biggest advantage is definitely the black quality. Compared to the version with an IPS panel, the difference is enormous – the picture gains depth, the contrast looks much better, and evening movie sessions no longer feel like watching content through a gray filter. For a budget segment device, this is truly a nice surprise. The proven Tizen system also deserves credit, which not only works smoothly but also offers access to a full range of applications, support for SmartThings, and a voice assistant (via an app). The PC mode and connection to a console work flawlessly – the fonts are clear and readable. Additionally, it has basic features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM, which – although they won’t turn this TV into an e-sport machine – are more than sufficient for occasional gaming.

Of course, like any construction in this budget, the U8000F with a VA panel has its limitations. The viewing angles are not one of its strong points – watching the picture from the side easily reveals a drop in quality. Nevertheless, it's hard to consider this a serious drawback – because something has to give. Better black levels are always associated with slightly lesser flexibility in adjustment. When it comes to HDR, we have rather a symbolic approach – the brightness is too low to talk about a true “wow” effect, and the color palette is limited. But let’s face the facts – that’s not why you buy such a TV. So if you're planning to purchase the U8000F, we definitely recommend opting for the version with a VA panel. It's still a very basic model, but in this version, it offers more than one might expect – especially in terms of black quality. And in this price range, that’s quite a lot.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Black
Stand
stand-Base Adjustment
stand-Fixed
Accessories
accessories-Stand
accessories-Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

5.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

6,000:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

5,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,400:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Philips PUS8560 in the size we tested is equipped with a VA panel. As a result, the black levels – for an LCD television – can be considered decent. And that is exactly the case with this model. Both the blacks and the overall contrast impression in the film scenes we tested are quite good – the image does not wash out, and details are visible even in more difficult sections.

But the panel alone is not everything. Unfortunately, the PUS8500 is not equipped with local dimming (which is a given looking at the TV segment), so one has to reckon with the fact that with completely turned-off lights, the black can resemble more shades of navy than true black. On the other hand – and here’s a plus for Philips – the Ambilight system does a great job. The backlighting makes a real impact on contrast perception. Thanks to this, even if the black technically isn't perfect, the subjective viewing experience becomes much more enjoyable. For many people, that’s enough for an evening screening to be truly impressive.

It is worth noting that the test concerns the variants with a VA matrix, which perform significantly better in terms of black levels and contrast compared to the 55-inch version equipped with an IPS panel. Thanks to the higher native contrast (though it is not a top result among VA matrices), the tested scenes looked much better – without noticeable grayness or the typical washed-out shadow effect found in IPS matrices. The black levels in the U8092F model can be considered really good and satisfying, especially in this price range. Of course, this is not a design equipped with local dimming, so it is hard to expect spectacular results in very challenging scenes. On the other hand, we are talking about an exceptionally budget-friendly television that performs quite solidly within its range.

HDR effect quality

4.8/10

3.1/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.4%, Bt.2020: 65.8%
DCI P3: 79.1%, Bt.2020: 58.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

273 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

300 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

324 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

343 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

334 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

173 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

265 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

90 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung U8000F (VA)

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Philips PUS8500

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

When it comes to HDR performance on the PUS8560, one can confidently say that it is quite average. The brightness of the panel is around 350 nits, which we consider to be the absolute minimum for viewing content in this format. However, this is not a result that will impress viewers looking for the best possible image.

On the plus side, it is worth noting that the PUS8500 series – including the PUS8560/12 we tested – is marketed as a QLED television. And indeed, we can expect a wider color gamut here. This model is equipped with an additional filter (PFS), and the coverage of the DCI-P3 color space at around 90% should be sufficient for the majority of users. This filter works very similarly to quantum dots. As a result, the colors are quite well saturated. It’s not an outstanding result, but perfectly adequate for watching movies and series on streaming platforms.

While the U8000F with a VA panel can still be praised for decent blacks, there are no longer any reasons to be impressed regarding brightness – especially in HDR scenes. The television reaches a maximum of just under 250 nits, which is simply too little to talk about any impressive light effects. Bright elements come off as pale, and scenes that should shine look rather flat. An interesting situation was observed during the test of a scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the screen noticeably darkened, as if the television were trying to hide its limitations in displaying blacks. One might get the impression that the device artificially darkens the image to improve contrast, but in practice, the effect doesn't make much of a difference, other than that we see less on the screen. Additionally, there's the issue of colors – the U8000F does not support a wide color gamut, so don't expect vibrant, saturated shades known from better models. The HDR image here resembles slightly brightened SDR and… maybe that’s even a good thing. For this model, it's not worth setting expectations for cinematic experiences – it's better to treat HDR as a modest addition.

Factory color reproduction

6.2/10

6.5/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the TV on the best available factory settings, which is in Film/Filmmaker mode – this is the mode we recommend for everyday viewing. Unfortunately, it is not without its flaws. Both in HD and HDR content, the image had a clear tendency to appear pinkish, caused by too much red and blue in the white balance. Another problem turned out to be excessive brightness of the image, which was confirmed by both the gamma chart and the EOTF curve. This characteristic was responsible for the loss of detail and washed-out colors in more challenging HDR scenes, as we mentioned earlier. Overall, this led to quite significant color reproduction errors – in extreme cases, the delta E value exceeded 7, while the threshold of visible errors for the human eye is about 3. This situation can be improved through calibration, and you can read about its effects below.

The Samsung U8000F has been tested by us in the best picture mode available out of the box – namely, Filmmaker Mode. This profile is supposed to provide a neutral, cinematic image, free of unnecessary enhancements and artificial beautifications. In the case of SDR content – mainly in HD or SD resolution – the television performed surprisingly well right out of the box. The only noticeable imperfection was brightness management. The gamma chart showed some deviations – slight brightening or dimming of certain tones – but in practice, it did not significantly affect the viewing experience. For a television in this segment, it performs quite well.

However, the situation is considerably weaker in HDR mode. Although white balance was still acceptable, color errors were very pronounced. In the Color Checker test, almost every sample was outside the target point, and the image itself looked unnatural – colors were shifted, sometimes too cool, at other times simply dull and lifeless. The main problem lies in the hardware limitations – the U8000F does not support the wide color gamut of DCI-P3, so it is physically unable to reproduce the colors anticipated by the HDR standard. And unfortunately, this is evident in almost every more demanding scene.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.4/10

7.5/10

The Dutch manufacturer offers quite a large dose of settings in their products, so as usual, we decided to dig a little into them. The effects are immediately visible – we managed to correct the white balance, which made the image stop appearing excessively pink. The brightness characteristics were also partially balanced, of course, within the limits that the television itself allows. The image is no longer overly vibrant, and the overall reception after calibration is definitely better than in the factory settings of the Filmmaker mode.

One could only criticize the characteristics of the EOTF curve, which still indicates that the image tends to lighten materials in HDR format. Despite our efforts, the darkest parts of scenes can still be too bright, and the brightest do not always reach their full contrast potential. However, it must be clearly stated that we are dealing with a typically budget construction – you cannot expect reference-quality reproduction of HDR content from it.

Calibration definitely helped this model – it improved the balance, toned down the aggressive color scheme, and brought the image closer to what one might expect from a well-configured movie mode. However, there are certain limitations that cannot be overlooked.

Right out of the box, the U8000F offered quite a decent picture in SDR for its price range. However, we managed to slightly enhance it – we reduced a subtle purple tint and improved the gamma characteristics, giving it a more natural curve. Despite these adjustments, the TV still tends to brighten the brightest details a bit too aggressively – the gamma graph shows a clear dip that cannot be fully corrected.

On the other hand, in HDR mode, it is noticeably weaker. It's hard to talk about any significant improvement here – despite attempts to tweak the settings, the picture still presents considerable color errors. A Delta E exceeding 7 means noticeable deviations that couldn't be effectively reduced. Unfortunately, this is a limitation of the design itself – the U8000F was simply not designed for serious HDR. In everyday SDR viewing, it performs quite well, but when it comes to HDR content... it's best not to have too high expectations.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

9.5/10

The PUS8560 handles color blending into smooth gradients very well. During testing, the image appeared cohesive and natural, with more serious issues with tonal transitions occurring only in very dark scenes – for example, in a shot with red water, where subtle cuts between colors could be seen. However, these are rather exceptions that do not spoil the reception of most content. It is worth mentioning another phenomenon that has a greater impact on image quality – the so-called dithering, or slight "sparkling" visible on solid backgrounds. This effect can be particularly noticeable in high-quality materials and may slightly detract from the impression of image clarity. It is for this flaw that we deducted some points in the rating.

One of the key elements influencing the perception of the image is the way the television handles tonal transitions – that is, the blending of colors and shades without clear boundaries. In the case of the Samsung U8092F model, it performed really well. On the test screens, we did not observe any visible banding or disruptions in the colored gradients. The image retains a natural quality, without excessive digital interference, which unfortunately tends to be the norm in this class of equipment. Minimal imperfections appeared in very bright sections, but they are practically imperceptible and do not affect daily use of the television.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.1/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Philips PUS8560 offers a feature that reduces posterization, hidden under the name "distortion reduction." And while it indeed serves its purpose by smoothing problematic tonal transitions, it operates a bit too broadly. In practice, it affects not only colorful gradients but also softens faces, clothing textures, and furniture surfaces. This decreases the authenticity of the image—especially in films where natural texture is of great importance. However, if someone is looking for smoothing at all costs, it's best to set this option to "Low." For cinema image enthusiasts—definitely not recommended.

On the plus side, the quality of upscaling older materials should be noted—the PUS8560 model handles them surprisingly well. The image maintains a natural softness without artificially enhanced sharpness. It is also worth mentioning that the television correctly displays very low-resolution content, avoiding problems with cropping the edges of the image (so-called overscan).

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same position in the lineup. This year's model is equipped with a feature for improving the fluidity of tonal transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Yes, the TV still uses quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but despite that – it can be confidently said that it works effectively. However, not everything went perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight image stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they should be prepared for the image to appear slightly "choppy."

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

5.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
-
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
47%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Smużenie ():

Smużenie (Upłynniacz ruchu 4K@60Hz):

The Philips PUS8560 is a television equipped with a 60 Hz refresh rate panel, which already limits its capabilities for displaying dynamic content. Watching sports or playing on a console is not one of the most enjoyable experiences. The situation is further worsened by the lack of any option to improve the smoothness of films. In the menu, we won't find settings that would allow for the activation of a motion smoother or even a slight motion smoothing in films recorded at 24 frames per second. You can imagine the effect. The picture may look jerky, especially in shots with panoramic camera movements.

The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so right from the start, it's clear that we shouldn't expect miracles. This is simply standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing but without any frills. The TV offers one motion enhancement slider – a feature called "Motion Blur Reduction," which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in movies. Higher settings give a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings help maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is "Clear Motion LED," which is a BFI mode – inserting black frames between image frames to improve motion sharpness. However, in practice, the screen flickers heavily when it's activated, and it should be treated more as an experiment than something that genuinely improves gaming comfort.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

Although the Philips PUS8560 is not designed specifically for gamers, the manufacturer decided to equip it with several features that may prove useful when connecting a console. It includes automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), as well as a simple connection status information bar – the so-called Game Bar. While it does not make a particularly strong visual impression, it serves its purpose. The presence of variable refresh rate (VRR), operating in the range of 48 to 60 Hz, might come as a surprise. While this is not a wide range, in the case of less demanding games or titles with unstable fluidity, VRR can help reduce the stuttering effect. However, this is the only element that can be considered above the minimum.

It should be clearly stated that the PUS8560 is not hardware for gamers looking for a responsive screen and full support for modern console features. It lacks HDMI 2.1 ports, the refresh rate is limited to 60 Hz, and the panel's response time is not among the fastest. This model may be suitable at most for casual gamers who want to enjoy the Ambilight system.

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which nonetheless may be sufficient for less demanding users. It has an automatic game mode – when a game is launched on the console, the TV automatically switches to low latency mode, significantly improving response time. It also includes a VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce a "tearing" effect on the screen – as long as we stay within this range.

And unfortunately, that's about it when it comes to advantages. Additions like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung from the 2025 line. In theory, the TV also supports the HGiG function, which should adjust the HDR image to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – even though this feature appears in brochures and marketing materials – its configuration on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
11 ms
1080p120
2160p60
13 ms
11 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
11 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The input lag on the PUS8560 is very good. When we previously wrote that this screen is more for "casual gamers," there's no shame in this regard – even compared to screens aimed at gamers. Results around 12 ms are truly exceptional, allowing for enjoyable responsive gameplay. It doesn't matter if we are playing in Full HD or 4K – the lag remains just as low, so if you care about quick reaction times, the PUS8560 will definitely not disappoint in this aspect.

In our tests, the Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in terms of input lag. Regardless of the resolution, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. Therefore, we can confidently say that gaming on this television will not cause irritation due to significant delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

Compatibility with PC

5.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

When it comes to working with a PC on the PUS8560, it looks... quite strange. Chroma 4:4:4 is present in "Monitor" mode, but there is a problem with gray fonts – not all subpixels light up, which makes the text appear pixelated. On the other hand, in "Game" mode, chroma 4:4:4 disappears, but the gray fonts look correct. In practice, we are therefore forced to juggle settings if we want to have perfectly readable text all the time. And what about gaming on the computer? Our opinion remains the same as regarding consoles – it's doable, but without any fireworks. There is no variable refresh rate for G-SYNC graphics cards, and the refresh rate itself remains relatively low. On the plus side, we can again highlight the very low input lag, which saves the day in fast-paced games.

Working on a computer using this television is a real pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and despite being a version with a VA panel, the readability of fonts is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on a PC, mainly due to its low input lag. However, one must take into account that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange because VRR worked without problems when it came to the console.

Viewing angles

3.3/10

3.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
68%
67%

The viewing angles on the PUS8560 are exactly what you would expect from a VA panel - they don't perform the best. The image loses quality even with a slight shift off-axis – colors become washed out, and the black starts to resemble a dark navy. This is, of course, the price paid for the better contrast that VA offers directly. In the case of our 55-inch unit, it is still acceptable, especially if the TV is perfectly positioned in front of the couch. But with larger screen sizes or a less central placement in the living room – it could be a problem for comfortable viewing.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.9/10

3.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Samsung U8000F (VA): 204 cd/m2

Philips PUS8500 : 331 cd/m2

PUS8560 performs moderately during the day. The satin finish of the panel effectively reduces reflections, so light from the window or lamp doesn't interfere too much. The black also looks decent for a VA panel – even in daylight, there are no significant losses in contrast. But the charm fades when it gets really bright. The panel's brightness is around 300 nits, which is definitely too little to speak of full comfort in a brightly lit room. In such conditions, the PUS8560 simply needs to be supported by curtains – otherwise, the picture starts to look quite pale.

Thanks to the satin coating on the Samsung U8092F matrix, it does quite well at reducing reflections. The screen doesn't act like a mirror, and the colors – given the capabilities of this class of device – remain fairly saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating alone won't work miracles. The television is simply too dark to effectively cut through very difficult lighting conditions. If we place it against a light source (e.g., a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, we have to reckon with the fact that not everything will be visible on it.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN256E_V056.002.127.051
1064
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

TV features

4.7/10

5.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Infrared
    Infrared
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Wyszukiwanie głosowe
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Classic TV Features:

If you are looking for a TV that "works" in the basic sense – the PUS8560 will serve that purpose. In terms of classic features, we have a rather minimalist set. On the plus side, it includes an electronic program guide (EPG), teletext, a backlit remote control with a classic numeric keypad, and a headphone jack. It sounds a bit like a dream set for seniors – and there is some truth to that. However, it must be said clearly: this is a TV with very limited capabilities. We won't find features for recording from DVB tuners to USB, nor is there a PiP mode or other conveniences known from more expensive models.

Smart TV:

How does SmartTV fare on the PUS8560? Well, this is where it gets a bit tricky. The PUS8560 runs on the Titan OS, which in this particular implementation caused significant problems. Some features, while present "on paper," simply did not work. For example: Wireless screen mirroring features like Chromecast or Miracast – we tried to activate them with several different phones and laptops… without success. Perhaps this will be fixed in the future, but at the time of testing – it did not work. Additionally, the system's speed left much to be desired – switching between apps or home screens was simply slow. A significant portion of the features in the menu feels heavily hidden in the depths of a poorly organized system. To make matters worse, the library of available applications is quite limited. While the situation with apps is better than last year, it is still far from ideal. The situation is somewhat saved by the modern remote – slim, elegant, and superbly made with a really great backlight. Unfortunately, it operates on classic infrared, so you have to point it at the screen. The only exception is the voice control, which works via Bluetooth… it's just a shame that it doesn't support Polish.

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well-developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home integration, and various extras, including exclusive Samsung apps. It also includes features like AirPlay and Chromecast, which make it easy to connect your phone to the TV and share media.

Unfortunately, as this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not include a solar remote control. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote control that visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. Regarding typical "TV" extras – it lacks a recording feature and a PiP mode (picture in picture). On the plus side, however, is HDMI eARC, which allows for easy control with the included remote, for example, a decoder or soundbar – and it actually works seamlessly.

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.7/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

PUS8560 handles playback of most popular video and audio formats from USB memory without any major issues, so there's no point in detailing the compatibilities individually. In daily use, it should just work – and it does. The only thing worth noting is the way it handles photos. Although the television easily recognizes common file extensions, with very high resolution graphic files, some photos may simply not display. This is not a huge problem, but it's good to keep it in mind, especially if we want to view photographs directly from the camera. Aside from that, PUS8560 shouldn't have any major problems with playback of files from USB.

Samsung U8092F handles playback of files rather smoothly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but we simply won’t find that in any Samsung model.

Some reservations can be made about the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a movie. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, and other extensions, such as SRT or SUB, unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it is worth knowing. Perhaps this is an issue to be improved in the future with a system update for the television.

Apps

4.6/10

8.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
No
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
No
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

6.2/10

5.7/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    6.2/10
    5.7/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    No

The TV sounds quite pleasant and it can confidently be stated that the sound level will be fully sufficient for most users – both for watching everyday programs and for an evening session with a series. Moreover, a nice surprise is that even in such an affordable series, Philips has decided to acquire licenses for full audio formats such as Dolby Atmos and DTS. This is great news for home theater and soundbar owners, as it means full compatibility and no need to "fiddle around" with connecting external devices.

U8092F doesn't pretend to have a home theater on board. We get a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds fine but without much excitement, though with a slight bass. For everyday viewing, such an audio setup is more than sufficient. We were pleasantly surprised that it was able to play a movie with the built-in Dolby Atmos codec (JOC) – although of course, we are not talking about true surround sound.