Philips PUS8079 vs TCL C75B

Direct compare

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

4.6

6.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.3

    6.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.9

    6.0

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    6.2

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    2.6

    4.9

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    7.7

  • Apps

    7.0

    10.0

  • Sound quality

    5.1

    6.6

Advantages

  • Unique Ambilight system

  • Excellent smoothness of tonal transitions

  • Low input lag values

  • Good built-in file player

  • Support for DTS audio

  • Great television for gamers - HDMI 2.1: VRR, ALLM, Game Bar

  • Very high refresh rate - 240Hz in FullHD and 144Hz in 4K

  • Very low input lag - 9ms

  • Advanced operating system - GoogleTV

  • Support for Dolby Vision, HDR10+

  • Decent blacks thanks to the VA panel

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low display brightness

  • No Dolby Vision

  • IR remote - requires aiming at the screen

  • TitanOs system - limited number of applications

  • Limited brightness (350 cd/m²), making it difficult to watch in bright rooms

  • Issues with the smoothness of the Google TV system

  • Lack of traditional features such as USB recording or PIP

  • Average response time of the panel causing motion blur

Our verdict

Philips PUS8079 is currently the cheapest model from the manufacturer, featuring multicolour Ambilight backlighting, which has a significant fan base. Operating with a small budget for the device, this will certainly be an advantage and a considerable added value. However, by opting for such a budget, we must also reckon with certain compromises that will be inherent in all televisions of this class. This television is primarily dedicated to those who mostly watch television during the day. Why? Primarily, the main reason is the contrast results, which, for a VA panel, were extremely low, as well as the television's luminance, hovering around 200 nits. Such brightness suggests that it will not be suitable for materials with a broad colour palette, namely streaming platforms at the highest packages. However, it is also worth noting the positives of the television, as it would be unfair not to point them out. This refers mainly to the fairly high tonal fidelity in materials significantly exceeding the television's capabilities and smooth gradation. The latter is the strongest point of the tested television, as it is practically hard to find fault with it, and if one were to try, it would be nitpicking. If we occasionally connect a console, we can expect low input lag, allowing for comfortable Sunday gaming. The contentious issue is the operating system itself. It is incredibly simple and sufficient for those who only need YouTube or Netflix, although in every other case, it may prove inadequate. So who is Philips PUS8079 for? Primarily for those looking for something that distinguishes a unit in this price range. And that something is certainly Ambilight.

The mid-range TV segment is expanding rapidly, and the TCL C75B demonstrates that you can get really solid equipment in this price range. This model has been clearly designed with gamers in mind – the HDMI 2.1 port offers ample scope, providing VRR, ALLM, as well as impressive 144 Hz refresh rates in 4K (or 240 Hz in Full HD), which will surely satisfy both gaming and sports fans. Operating the TV is enjoyable and intuitive, mainly thanks to the Google TV system. Although you may encounter slight stutters, the wealth of available applications and features compensates for that – practically everything we need is at our fingertips or even accessible by voice if we wish to converse with the remote in Polish. As for picture quality, the TCL C75B also performs well. Thanks to its VA panel, it boasts quite good contrast, and the presence of Dolby Vision allows for enjoyable HDR effects, even if the brightness isn't groundbreaking. Of course, it is not equipment without flaws – despite the fast panel, there is some motion blur, and the lack of traditional features (like USB recording) may disappoint some users. Nevertheless, in its price category, the C75B is a very attractive option, especially for those looking for a screen designed for high-level gaming.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Contrast and black detail

4.3/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,550:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,150:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

5,400:1

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

5,700:1

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

4,100:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Philips PUS8079 television features a VA panel. It is worth noting that the size we tested is 43", as this manufacturer often changes the panel depending on the size. Although this type of panel should provide at least good blacks, since we are dealing with a very budget-friendly unit, the results are rather predictable. Results at around 2300:1 are among the lowest for this type of panel. More advanced units achieve results that are 2-3 times better in this regard. However, the current state of affairs should not overly surprise us, as we are dealing with a device that is very, very budget-friendly. We should also mention that in this case we have direct backlighting (Direct), whose only advantage is the uniformity of the backlight. Unfortunately, it has not been divided into any zones, which is not surprising given the low class of the device. On the positive side, light separation was noted in the test with the film "Oblivion".

The TCL C75B television tested by us in size X" is equipped with a VA panel, which naturally provides quite decent contrast results – and this was also observed during our tests. On each test pattern, the television achieved a contrast ratio of around 5500:1. This is a result that can be considered very good in this price range. The black levels on this model perform really well, although of course, they are far from perfect.

Due to the C75B's belonging to the mid-range segment, we do not find local dimming technology here. This is particularly noticeable in more demanding scenes, such as those from the film Sicario 2, where we observed that the black takes on a navy shade instead of a deep black. This limitation of panels without local dimming can be especially visible in evening screenings with the lights off, when the dark elements of the image are more prominent. It is worth remembering this when choosing a television in this category, especially if we care about the best quality of black while watching films at night.

HDR effect quality

2.7/10

5.1/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 80.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 95.0%, Bt.2020: 73.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

179 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

164 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

368 nit

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

382 nit

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

429 nit

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

404 nit

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

425 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C75B

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Philips PUS8079

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

The maximum brightness in content with a wide tonal range at a level of 202 nits is extremely low and, in practice, does not allow for watching films and series on streaming platforms in the highest quality. It is worth mentioning that in this case, the use of the HDR format equipped with dynamic metadata will not help either. Why won't it help? Because the only such format implemented in the television is HDR10+, which is extremely unpopular, and films recorded in this format are scarce. It is also worth noting that PUS8079 utilises WLED backlighting, which unfortunately is not the best solution, resulting in a coverage of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut of only 80%. The result of this situation is significantly less intense colours in HDR content.

During our test, the TCL C75B "spat out" around 380 nits of brightness. We recorded similar results while watching most of the films we tested. They can be considered average – the television does not perform poorly in this segment, but around 400 nits is definitely too low to fully experience the magic of HDR effects. Of course, these results are better than those of budget models, which can achieve almost half the brightness values. However, for HDR enthusiasts seeking stronger lighting effects and greater realism, the C75B may prove insufficient. On the positive side, it's worth mentioning the DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage of 95%. This is a very good result that easily suffices to enjoy a wide range of colours in content available on popular streaming platforms. Vivid and rich colours are definitely a strong point of this model.

Factory color reproduction

1.8/10

7.3/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode in terms of colour reproduction and fidelity to the director's vision was "Film". Admittedly, it was the best among the pre-defined modes, although it had significant discrepancies between what the film's author wanted to convey and what the tested television displayed. Both in SDR and HDR materials (though to a lesser extent in the latter), the white balance, which is the most fundamental element responsible for image purity, turned out to be somewhat of a repeat of the vivid mode, with the blue tint known from displays on shop shelves. Moving directly to SDR materials and what is responsible for contrast, namely gamma, we see that it is significantly reduced. This leads to cutting down on an already limited contrast range and brightening the entire image. In the EOTF curve, which is responsible for the increase in brightness pace in HDR materials, we observe a sharp drop below the reference line, which, given the limited light output of the television, had a significant impact on the perception of these contents, which were even darker. We will not separate the assessments of the colours themselves, as in both cases they achieved astronomical deltaE values, being simply completely different from what they should be.

TCL C75B offers several picture modes, but in our opinion, the best choice is the “Film” mode. Although its settings are quite decent, the television struggles with some colour reproduction issues. In our tests, we noticed that the image had a noticeably pinkish tint compared to what could be considered accurate. This effect was particularly evident in skin tones, which appeared unnaturally flushed. The main culprit for this phenomenon turned out to be the white balance, characterised by an excessive amount of blue and red in both HD and 4K HDR materials.

An additional problem was the way brightness was rendered. The gamma, which is responsible for the visibility of details in darker materials, was definitely boosted, causing details in the darkest parts of the screen to be invisible, disappearing into complete blackness (e.g., the lower part of the screen in the comparison photo - around the actress's ear). Similarly, the situation was reflected in the EOTF curve, which was below the correct value, suggesting that we might encounter a similar problem in 4K HDR content.

Thanks to our experience and the right tools, we decided to take matters into our own hands and see how much we could extract from this model after professional calibration. We describe the details in the next section.

Color reproduction after calibration

4.8/10

8.2/10

Fortunately, Philips implements advanced image correction tools in all its televisions. SDR materials benefited the most here, and the enormous deltaE errors were significantly corrected, both white balance and gamma underwent considerable reshaping. Although one cannot speak of a reference image here, it is definitely better, and films or series can be watched without causing headaches, and above all, eye strain. Naturally, HDR materials, due to the very low luminance of the television, could not be corrected to the same extent as those with a standard colour palette; however, the EOTF curve and white balance were roughly straightened out. Unfortunately, that was all we managed to squeeze out of our unit, although it should be noted that each unit is different and has completely different errors, smaller or larger.

After calibrating the TCL C75B, it has clearly improved in terms of colour reproduction. Although the television does not offer many options for adjusting the white balance, we managed to enhance its settings quite significantly. As a result, the image is no longer excessively pink, and the colours now look much more natural and harmonious.

The gamma jump, which was previously an issue, has not completely disappeared, but we have managed to reduce it considerably. This has made details in dark scenes more visible – both in HD and 4K HDR materials.

Unfortunately, the lack of local dimming is still noticeable. The "blooming black" effect remains, but that is a limitation of the display itself. Nevertheless, the colours after calibration look far better, and the image is much more enjoyable to watch.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

8.2/10

It seems that the fluidity of tonal transitions will be the greatest advantage of the tested television. Practically in each of the scenes, they were at a very satisfactory level. The only moments where it is insufficient are in dark scenes, but even in these areas, it is quite good, and the overall experience can still be rated very positively, especially considering the price of the tested device. An issue not related to the fluidity of tonal transitions, but clearly visible in the pictures, is the noticeable backlight bleed in the corners. This is a matter of the technology itself, but it is worth bearing in mind that these cheaper units may be more prone to a visible effect.

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, the TCL C75B performs really well. The gradation of the darkest colours is particularly impressive – here the television does not disappoint and presents a high-quality image.

Some imperfections can be seen in the brightest areas of the screen, such as in a scene from the film Kingsman (the sun in the blue sky). Nevertheless, the final effect should satisfy the vast majority of users.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

We will return once more to the issue of tonal transitions but in the context of the overall improvement of image quality. As we can observe in the photograph on the left side, the enhancement function for gradation works brilliantly. Moreover, it offers several settings, and each of them, even the lowest one, provides beneficial effects, and what’s more, it does not soften the effect of film grain. We will reiterate that this function is the greatest advantage of the tested television.

Next, we will take a look at image scaling. Here, the tested television performed worse. We can primarily notice severely jagged fine details and a characteristic white halo around the figures. One must not forget about the considerable artificial sharpening of the image.

TCL C75B has a tone transition smoothing function, but unfortunately, we cannot commend it. Regardless of the selected level – low or high – tone transitions in older materials remained visible, as if the function wasn't working at all. It's hard to say anything positive about it, as in practice it seems completely useless.

The image scaling is better. The television performs quite decently, although on thinner elements, like branches in the background, you can notice slight jaggedness. However, this is not something that significantly interferes with daily viewing.

Unfortunately, a bigger problem turned out to be overscan, which is cutting off the edges of the image. In our tests, there were instances where news tickers or other elements near the edge of the screen were cut off. This is definitely something to pay attention to, especially if we use the television for watching news programmes or content with text on the screen.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.2/10

7.3/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
240Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

This paragraph, unlike the others, will be extremely short. The reason for this state of affairs is the lack of implementation of even the most basic motion smoothing function, which was to be expected, considering the price of the device. We also note that we are dealing with a VA panel, which in itself will not have the best sharpness under the sun. This type of panel is primarily associated with high contrast, which goes hand in hand with quite slow response times, as we can clearly read from the matrix analysis results. As you can see, from the photos taken in quick motion, the image is typically blurred for this type of panel. Although it will not be the ideal option, it can conditionally be used for watching sports, keeping in mind the less than optimal sharpness in motion. It is worth mentioning that movies will be characterised by judder, as the television does not have any, even the simplest, motion smoother.

The TCL C75B definitely has something to offer gamers. The television is equipped with a panel that can display images with a refresh rate of 144 Hz in 4K, and even 240 Hz in Full HD. These are really impressive results, especially for a model from the entry-level range.

In addition, there are features for improving fluidity and reducing motion blur in films. The "Motion" option allows precise adjustment of the effect on a 10-point scale, which offers great personalisation possibilities - everyone can set the fluidity as they like.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8079 offers only the most basic support for gaming in the form of ALLM, VRR, and a Game Bar. The most important information is that thanks to the implementation of the feature responsible for dynamic frequency changing, the picture is actually quite smooth for this price range and does not suffer from tearing.

A slightly greater nod towards gamers is the introduction of the Game Bar, allowing for real-time editing of settings. This means we won't have to exit the game to make any changes to the picture. Importantly, it has not been stripped of options known from higher models. Thus, we will find features such as shadow enhancement for better visibility in dark areas and a colour filter for players with visual impairments.

The TCL C75B is undoubtedly a television designed with gamers in mind. It offers nearly everything that even the most demanding console users could need. With the implementation of fully capable HDMI 2.1, the television supports features like ALLM (Automatic Low Latency Mode) and VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) – operating within the full potential of the television, up to 240 Hz in Full HD resolution.

Additionally, the television supports advanced HDR technologies, including Dolby Vision and HGiG, allowing for even better detail reproduction in HDR-optimised games. The C75B is also equipped with a very convenient interface for gamers in the form of Game Bar, where all key parameters such as refresh rate, input lag, and image settings can be checked – all within a single click.

In a nutshell: the C75B is a great choice for gamers, offering a wide range of features that allow users to fully enjoy the capabilities of modern consoles and games.

Input lag

9.9/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
17 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
14 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
19 ms
2160p120 DV
11 ms

The results of input lag measurements in the Philips PUS8079 are at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will certainly appreciate the efforts of the manufacturer, which ensure that a game running at 4K60Hz with HDR has only 13 ms of latency, which is practically unnoticeable even in online games.

Input lag in the TCL C75B is something that really impresses. At a refresh rate of 144 Hz, the lag is only 9 ms, which makes the TV's response to our actions on the pad or keyboard practically instantaneous. For 60 Hz, the result is 19 ms – while not record-breakingly low, it still falls within the range where delays are practically unnoticeable during gaming. One could say that the difference would not be felt anyway, which makes this TV a good choice even for more demanding gamers.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
14ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
240Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

After connecting the television to the computer and wishing to use it as a monitor, we can expect a low input lag of 14 ms, which is practically unnoticeable on the mouse-screen-eye line. Unfortunately, the readability of the fonts is at a very low level, which practically excludes the use of Philips PUS8079 as a monitor. Why? If you take a closer look at the picture of the grey text, you will notice the phenomenon of so-called dithering. It is clearly visible that not all subpixels are illuminated on the adjacent pixels, while all should be active during the display of grey. Therefore, the text will be unbearably blurry and will effectively hinder work.

TCL C75B is quite a good choice for connecting to a computer. With high refresh rates, low input lag, and support for G-Sync, the television performs excellently in games – both dynamic ones and more demanding titles. The image is smooth, and the response to our actions is quick, which gamers will surely appreciate.

For office work, the television also does well. Text is readable, although on a dark background some imperfections can be noticed – certain fonts look as if there are missing pieces of vertical lines. This may be distracting if we work a lot with documents or text editing. However, if the computer is mainly used for gaming or watching films, the TCL C75B will easily fulfill its role as a monitor. It is a versatile piece of equipment that can handle most applications.

Viewing angles

3.8/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
41%
86%

The biggest and most common flaw of VA panels is their viewing angles. This particularly applies to units without angle coatings, which would make a significant difference in this regard. Interestingly, the tested hero performed considerably better than, for instance, the PML9009 we recently evaluated. Nevertheless, even a slight deviation from the axis leads to a strong degradation of colours and a drop in contrast.

The viewing angles on the TCL C75B are, unfortunately, very poor. This is a typical compromise with VA panels – better blacks at the cost of side viewing visibility. The image quickly loses quality when viewed from an angle, which is the complete opposite of what IPS panel televisions offer. If we plan to watch the television mainly straight on, this won't be a major issue. However, with a larger number of viewers sitting at different angles, the image quality may disappoint.

TV efficiency during daytime

2.6/10

4.9/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Słabe
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

TCL C75B: 366 cd/m2

Philips PUS8079: 192 cd/m2

In our test sequence, there was also an opportunity to check the performance of the television during daytime viewing. Moreover, we suggest such an operational scenario, considering the insufficient contrast. However, returning to the point: the application of the satin coating yielded poor results, which, combined with the low luminance of the television across all models, effectively disqualifies it for viewing in a sunny room.

The TCL C75B performs moderately during the day. The satin screen somewhat limits reflections, but it's not an ideal solution. The brightness is also an issue – 350 cd/m² is simply too low for comfortable viewing in a brightly lit room.

In less extreme conditions, such as in a moderately lit room, the television manages well. However, if the sun beams directly onto the screen in summer, watching may become tiring. It's worth keeping this in mind when choosing this model.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
v8-t653t01-lf1v412
Image processor
mt5896 2,5gb ram

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

TV features

5/10

7.7/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Google TV
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    No
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Infrared
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

It is impossible not to mention the biggest distinguishing feature of the manufacturer's televisions first. We are of course talking about the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting, which placed on the rear casing of the device projects colours adapted to what is happening on the screen, often allowing for an even greater experience of immersion. The operating system responsible for the television's functionality is Philips's proprietary system charmingly named TitanOs. It is definitely more closed and limited in terms of application resources than in the case of televisions from this manufacturer based on the GoogleTV system. Besides the lack of significant applications, its closed nature is also manifested in another way. We will not be able to perform basic tasks such as programming recordings or recording to USB. Those using devices from Apple may also feel disappointed by the lack of AirPlay functionality, which allows for easy screen streaming. Fortunately, there is the option to connect a keyboard and mouse for smoother navigation through the television's menu. It is worth mentioning that the possibility to connect headphones exists, but only wired ones. If we plug them in, we can also play sound from the television's speakers. It should also be added that the television is controlled via IR, not Bluetooth, which is quite inconvenient in these times.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few "buts", especially when we are aware users needing and using many streaming platforms. This is rather an option for those limiting themselves to the so-called holy trinity, namely Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

TCL C75B is a television that is primarily based on the Google TV system. The platform offers access to most popular applications, such as Netflix, YouTube, and Prime Video, which makes it great for watching content from the internet. However, it should be mentioned that the system can sometimes be slightly laggy, which may be noticeable during everyday use.

In terms of smart features, the C75B performs well. Voice control with the help of the built-in assistant works efficiently, and thanks to AirPlay and Miracast, it is easy to stream content from your phone or laptop. Bluetooth allows you to connect headphones, controllers, or other devices without any major issues.

However, if someone is counting on traditional television features, they may be disappointed. There is no option to record programmes onto a USB drive, nor is there a picture-in-picture (PiP) feature. TCL has been omitting such features for some time, which may not appeal to users who primarily use traditional television.

Playing files from USB

8/10

9.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default media player built into Philips PUS8079 offers quite a wide range of capabilities, but it also has its limitations. It plays virtually all video formats, with the obvious exception of Dolby Vision and the less obvious .asf, which is not commonly encountered. However, the issues lie in the absence of the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrate and support for .sub files, which are quite popular. When it comes to photos, the player performs adequately, but it lacks support for some popular resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, which is used on Apple devices. The player performs best with audio, where it cannot be faulted. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no possibility of expanding the functionalities, which means we are left with what the manufacturer has prepared.

The built-in media player in the TCL C75B works really well. It handles most popular photo and audio formats without any issues. Although there are some shortcomings in supporting certain formats, thanks to Google TV, you can easily install an alternative player that will resolve this issue.

Apps

7/10

10/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
OK
Kodi

Sound

5.1/10

6.6/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    5.1/10
    6.6/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    Yes

The best thing that can be said about the sound system in Philips PUS8079 is that it is present. There is practically a lack of midtones and bass. However, the high tones stand out in an unpleasant way. Interestingly, it features a complete set of the most important audio codecs, including Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio. As a result, connecting our home theatre system will be just a formality.

The sound on the TCL C75B is really pleasant, especially at lower volume levels. The bass is noticeable and enhances the sound nicely, but only up to about 40% volume. At higher settings, problems start to arise – the bass causes unpleasant vibrations, and the speakers begin to crackle. If we plan to frequently use higher volume levels, it is worth considering purchasing a soundbar, as the built-in speakers may not cope with more demanding situations.