Philips PUS8500 vs Samsung U8000F (IPS)

Direct compare

PUS8500 / PUS8560 / PUS8510 / PUS8600

Info

U8000F / U8092F

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.4

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    4.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.2

    5.8

  • Gaming on console

    6.7

    6.3

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    3.4

  • Utility functions

    4.9

    5.6

  • Apps

    4.6

    8.3

  • Sound quality

    6.2

    5.7

Advantages

  • Ambilight System

  • High native contrast - VA panel

  • Low input lag

  • Essential features for gamers: ALLM and VRR

  • Full support for audio formats: Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Backlit remote with numerical keypad

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Good viewing angles (IPS Matrix)

  • Great for working with text - excellently displays fonts

  • Low input lag

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

Disadvantages

No like
  • Average panel brightness

  • The TitanOS system feels unfinished (some features don't work, gaps in applications)

  • Infrared remote control

  • Font readability issues (PC)

  • Low brightness

  • Very poor black level and contrast (IPS panel)

  • Inferior appearance compared to its predecessor

  • Infrared remote control

Our verdict

Ambilight because that's exactly where we need to start, it's the biggest reason to buy the PUS8500. The three-sided backlighting on the TV looks fantastic, especially in the evening. It creates atmosphere, masks contrast imperfections, and makes viewing simply more enjoyable. Even if the black isn’t perfect here, at high contrast the native VA panel is just good. On top of that, there’s really decent input lag and several gaming features like ALLM and VRR. Although there’s no HDMI 2.1 or 120Hz panel, casual gaming should be a pleasure. Especially since it plays responsively and without delays. Let’s add full support for audio formats – it includes both Dolby Atmos and DTS, so soundbar owners also have something to be happy about.

But let’s not kid ourselves – this is still a budget TV, and at times that’s quite obvious. Brightness is average – not so weak that you can't watch anything, but if you hit an exceptionally sunny day, watching under such conditions without blinds can be problematic. However, in our opinion, the biggest disappointment with the PUS8560 is the Titan OS operating system. Despite the fact that the system debuted some time ago, some things just didn’t work – for example, screen mirroring from a phone despite the manufacturer stating that this feature is present. There are fewer apps than the competition, and the system itself feels a bit clunky. Generally, it seems to do something already, but it clearly lacks refinement.

Of course, this isn’t a TV meant to compete with top models. But if someone is looking for something simple, with the cool atmosphere that the Ambilight system provides, it’s quite a fair proposition. You just need to know what to expect and accept the compromises, of which there are plenty here.

The U8000F is a very basic television that may find its buyers among those looking for the cheapest Samsung 4K with Smart TV. And that is exactly its purpose. Thanks to the Tizen system, this model offers quite a bit in terms of smart features – the number of applications and possibilities may catch the attention of those who want a reasonably smart device at the lowest price possible. When it comes to picture quality – it's average, which isn't surprising in this class. Nonetheless, there are a few upsides: quite decent viewing angles will work well for traditional TV viewing from different parts of the room, and the basic features for gamers (like VRR and ALLM) may be enough for typical "Sunday" gamers. The PC mode also deserves a mention – the television handles font display very well, so it can also serve as a cheap monitor. Of course, this is not a model that can be recommended to everyone "sight unseen." But if someone is looking for a cheap Samsung with 4K resolution and a solid Smart system, then the U8000F is just that kind of device.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Black
Stand
stand-Base Adjustment
stand-Fixed
Accessories
accessories-Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

1.1/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

6,000:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

5,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

650:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Philips PUS8560 in the size version we tested is equipped with a VA panel. This means that black levels – for an LCD TV – can be considered decent. And that is indeed the case with this model. Both blacks and the overall impression of contrast in the movie scenes we tested are really quite good – the image doesn't bleed, and details are visible even in more challenging segments.

But the panel alone is not everything. Unfortunately, the PUS8500 does not come with local dimming (which is a given looking at the TV segment), so one has to reckon with the fact that in completely dark conditions, black can resemble shades of navy more than true black. On the other hand – and here's a plus for Philips – the Ambilight system does an excellent job. The backlighting really affects the perception of contrast. As a result, even if technically the black isn't perfect, the subjective experience of the picture becomes much more enjoyable. For many people, that's enough to make an evening viewing really spectacular.

Samsung U8000F, or more precisely the U8092F model in the 55-inch version, is equipped with an IPS panel. Let’s be honest – this is not the best choice when it comes to properly displaying blacks and contrast. The results in this category are simply poor. The contrast is abysmal, and watching dark scenes with any kind of “cinematic” effect is nearly impossible. Additionally, the fact that the TV lacks local dimming doesn’t help, making it difficult to achieve better results. The only thing that deserves praise is the quite decent uniformity of the panel – but that’s more of a minor consolation. Overall, it’s not good. If you care about deep blacks and reasonable contrast, it’s definitely better to go for a variant with a VA panel, which performs significantly better in this particular series.

HDR effect quality

4.1/10

2.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.4%, Bt.2020: 65.8%
DCI P3: 81.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

273 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

300 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

324 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

343 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

334 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

191 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

224 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

79 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

234 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung U8000F (IPS)

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Philips PUS8500

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

When it comes to HDR performance on the PUS8560, it's safe to say that it's rather average. The brightness of the panel is around 350 nits, so we consider this to be the absolute minimum for watching content in this format. However, it’s not a result that will impress viewers looking for the best possible picture.

On the plus side, it's worth noting that the PUS8500 series – including the PUS8560/12 tested here – is marketed as a QLED television. And indeed, we can expect a wider colour gamut here. This model is equipped with an additional filter (PFS), and the DCI-P3 coverage of around 90% should suffice for most users. This filter operates very similarly to quantum dots. As a result, colours are quite well-saturated. It's not an outstanding result, but it's entirely sufficient for watching movies and series from streaming platforms.

Better doesn't mean good – and that's exactly how you can sum up the capabilities of the U8092F when it comes to displaying bright movie scenes in HDR mode. The brightness of the panel is just under 250 nits, which is definitely too low to enjoy any light effects. An interesting situation was observed during measurements of the fourth scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the television clearly dimmed the entire screen in an attempt to achieve better black levels (which still remain weak). One could even suggest that the device employs some form of "global dimming," but unfortunately – the effects are still very poor. To make matters worse, the television does not support a wide colour gamut – the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 80%, so don’t count on truly vibrant colours. The HDR image here looks more like slightly brightened SDR, and that’s the approach we would suggest you stick to when it comes to this television.

Factory color reproduction

6.2/10

6.5/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the television on the best available factory settings, that is, in Film/Filmmaker mode – this is the mode we recommend for everyday viewing. Unfortunately, it is not without its flaws. Both in HD and HDR content, the image had a distinct tendency to pinkness, caused by an excess of red and blue in the white balance. Another issue turned out to be excessive brightness of the image, as confirmed by both the gamma graph and the EOTF curve. This characteristic was responsible for the loss of detail and washed-out colours in more challenging HDR scenes we mentioned earlier. All of this led to quite significant colour reproduction errors – in extreme cases, the delta E value exceeded 7, while the threshold for visibility of errors for the human eye is about 3. This situation can be improved through calibration, and you can read about its effects below.

Samsung U8000F has been tested in the best possible built-in picture mode on the television, which is Filmmaker Mode. This mode should – at least in theory – provide a cinematic, reference image without unnecessary enhancements. For SDR content (mainly HD/SD), the television presented itself surprisingly well out of the box. White balance errors hovered around a value of 3, which is roughly on the edge of perceptibility. The only criticism could be directed at brightness management – the gamma chart showed a slight tendency to brighten or darken certain sections, but overall it performs quite well for this price segment.

Unfortunately, it looks much worse in HDR mode. Although the white balance was not terrible, the television had significant colour errors – particularly evident on the Color Checker chart, where almost every sample fell outside the target point. The image in HDR simply looks unnatural, and the colours can be shifted, muted, or too cool. This largely stems from the fact that U8000F does not support a wide colour gamut (DCI-P3). The television is physically unable to display correct colours in the HDR standard – and this is unfortunately felt in every more demanding material.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.4/10

7.5/10

The Dutch manufacturer offers quite a large dose of settings in its products, so as usual, we decided to tinker with them a bit. The effects are immediately noticeable – we managed to correct the white balance, which made the image cease to appear overly pinkish. The brightness characteristics were also partially equalised, of course within the limits that the television itself allows. The picture is no longer so excessively brightened, and the overall reception after calibration is definitely better than in the factory settings of the Filmmaker mode.

You could only nitpick about the characteristics of the EOTF curve, which still indicates that the image tends to brighten HDR content. Despite our efforts, the darkest parts of the scenes can still be too bright, and the brightest ones do not always reach their full contrast potential. However, it must be clearly stated that we are dealing with a typically budget-oriented design – one cannot expect reference-quality rendering of HDR content from it.

Calibration has definitely helped this model – it improved the balance, toned down the aggressive colour palette, and brought the image closer to what one can expect from a well-configured movie mode. However, there are certain limitations that cannot be overcome.

Even though the U8000F already offered a fairly good picture in SDR straight out of the box, we managed to tweak it a bit more. We were able to remove a slight purple tint and adjust the gamma to a more reasonable level. However, the television still tends to over-brighten the smallest and brightest parts of the image – the gamma chart shows a characteristic "dip" that is hard to fully straighten out.

Unfortunately, the situation looks worse in HDR. It's difficult to talk about any significant improvement here – the television simply isn't designed for HDR content. We tried to adjust the picture in the advanced settings, but despite our efforts, the colour errors remained quite noticeable – a delta E above 7 is already significantly visible deviations. It's a bit unfortunate, but that's the charm of a budget build. In SDR, the U8000F performs reasonably, whereas HDR is simply not its league.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

9/10

The PUS8560 handles colour blending into smooth gradients very well. During testing, the image appeared coherent and natural, with serious issues regarding tonal transitions occurring only in very dark scenes – for example, in a shot with red water, where subtle cut-offs between colours could be observed. However, these are rather exceptions that don’t spoil the perception of most content. It’s worth mentioning another phenomenon that has a greater impact on image quality – this relates to the so-called dithering, which is a slight “tingling” visible on solid backgrounds. This effect can be particularly noticeable in high-quality materials and may slightly detract from the impression of image clarity. It is for this fault that we deducted some points in the rating.

Another important thing to pay attention to when assessing image quality is the smoothness of tonal transitions – that is, how the television handles blending colours and shades. And here the Samsung U8092F performs... almost perfectly. On the tested images, there are no noticeable banding transitions, no issues with colourful gradients, and the whole picture isn't artificially sharpened, which unfortunately happens with many televisions in this class. The image looks natural and very clear. We noticed minimal problems with the brightest scenes, but that's more of a nitpick that only a very trained eye would catch.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.1/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Philips PUS8560 offers a deinterlacing function, hidden under the name “distortion reduction”. And while it indeed serves its purpose, smoothing out problematic tonal transitions, it operates a bit too broadly. In practice, it affects not just colourful gradients but also softens faces, clothing textures, and furniture surfaces. This undermines the authenticity of the image – especially in films where natural texture is of great importance. However, if someone is looking for smoothing at any cost, it’s best to set this option to “Low”. For cinema image enthusiasts – we definitely do not recommend it.

On the plus side, the quality of scaling older materials is worth noting – the PUS8560 model handles them surprisingly well. The image retains a natural softness without artificially boosted sharpness. It’s also worth mentioning that the TV correctly displays very low-resolution content, avoiding issues with image cropping (so-called overscan).

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same place in the offering.

This year's model has been equipped with a function to improve the smoothness of tonal transitions, which has been implemented significantly better than last year. Yes, the TV still uses quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but even so – it can be confidently said that it operates effectively.

However, not everything has gone perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight frame stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they must be aware that the picture may appear slightly "choppy".

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
-
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
48%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

The Philips PUS8560 is a television equipped with a 60 Hz refresh rate panel, which already limits its capabilities for displaying dynamic content right from the start. Watching sports or playing on a console is not one of the more enjoyable experiences. The situation is further worsened by the absence of any option to improve film fluidity. In the menu, you won’t find settings that would allow for the activation of motion smoothing or even a slight motion blur for films recorded at 24 frames per second. You can imagine the effect. The image can appear choppy, especially in shots with panoramic camera movements.

Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so right from the start, it's clear that we shouldn't expect miracles. This is simply the standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing, but without any fireworks.

The television offers one motion smoothing slider – a feature called “Motion Blur Reduction”, which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in movies. Higher settings provide a more “theatrical” and smoothed effect, while lower ones maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is “Clear Motion LED”, or BFI mode – which inserts black frames between the image frames to enhance motion clarity. However, in practice, the screen flickers significantly when it's activated, and it's better viewed as an experiment rather than something that truly enhances gaming comfort.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

Although the Philips PUS8560 is not designed with gamers in mind, the manufacturer has equipped it with a few features that may prove useful when connecting a console. Onboard, we find automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), as well as a simple connection status information bar – the so-called Game Bar. It doesn't make a particularly visual impression, but it serves its purpose. The presence of variable refresh rate (VRR), operating in the range of 48 to 60 Hz, may come as a surprise. This is not a wide range, but for less demanding games or titles with unstable frame rates, VRR can help reduce the tearing effect. However, this is the only element that can be considered beyond the minimum.

It must be clearly stated that the PUS8560 is not equipment for gamers looking for a responsive screen and full support for modern console features. It lacks HDMI 2.1 ports, the refresh rate is limited to 60 Hz, and the panel's response time is not among the fastest. This model may at best suit people who play occasionally and want to enjoy the Ambilight system.

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which may still be sufficient for less demanding users. It has an automatic game mode – when a game is launched on the console, the TV automatically switches to low latency mode, which significantly improves response time. It also includes a VRR function, or variable refresh rate, which works within the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 won't produce the "tearing" effect – as long as we stay within this range.

And unfortunately, that's about it for the advantages. Additional features like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung’s 2025 line. In theory, the TV also supports the HGiG function, which should adjust the HDR image to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – although this function appears in brochures and store materials – its setup on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
12 ms
1080p120
2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
12 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The input lag on the PUS8560 is very good. When we previously mentioned that this screen is rather for the "casual gamer", there's nothing to be ashamed of in this regard – even compared to screens aimed at gamers. Results around 12 ms are truly remarkable, allowing for an enjoyable responsive gameplay experience. It doesn't matter whether we're playing in Full HD or 4K – the lag remains equally low, so if you're after a fast reaction time, the PUS8560 definitely won't disappoint in this area.

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally well in our input lag tests. Regardless of resolution or mode – the results were very low, which is quite impressive for this price segment. Therefore, it’s safe to say that gaming on this TV will not cause frustration due to significant delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

Compatibility with PC

5.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

If we're talking about working with a PC on the PUS8560, it looks… quite strange. Chroma 4:4:4 is present in “Monitor” mode, but there’s a problem with grey fonts – not all subpixels light up, which makes the text appear jagged. Meanwhile, in “Game” mode, chroma 4:4:4 disappears, but the grey fonts look correct. In practice, we are therefore forced to juggle settings if we want to have perfectly readable text all the time. And what about gaming on a computer? Here our opinion remains unchanged compared to consoles – it’s possible, but without fireworks. There’s no variable refresh rate for G-SYNC graphics cards, and the refresh rate itself remains relatively low. On the plus side, we can once again highlight the very low input lag, which saves the situation in fast-paced games.

Working on the computer using this television is a real pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and thanks to the arrangement of the sub-pixels in the IPS panel, the readability of fonts – regardless of colour or size – is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on PC, mainly due to the low input lag. However, one must keep in mind that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange because VRR worked without any issues when it came to the console.

Viewing angles

3.3/10

7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
68%
34%

The viewing angles on the PUS8560 are exactly what you'd expect from a VA panel - it's not the best. The image loses quality even with a slight shift off-axis – colours become washed out, and blacks start to resemble a dark navy. This is, of course, the price for the better contrast that VA offers head-on. In the case of our 55-inch model, it can still be acceptable, especially if the TV is positioned perfectly in front of the couch. But with larger screens or a less central setup in the living room – it could be a problem for comfortable viewing.

The viewing angles on the Samsung U8092F are very good – as is typical for an IPS panel. The image doesn’t lose much in terms of brightness or colour saturation, even with a greater deviation from the axis. Of course, it’s not on the level of organic screens – but it’s entirely sufficient for comfortably watching the image at an angle, for example, from the side of the couch.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.9/10

3.4/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Samsung U8000F (IPS): 218 cd/m2

Philips PUS8500 : 331 cd/m2

The PUS8560 performs reasonably well during the day... moderately. The satin finish of the panel does a pretty good job of reducing reflections, which means that light from windows or lamps doesn't interfere too much. The black levels also look decent for a VA panel – even in daylight, there aren't significant contrast losses. But the magic fades when it gets really bright. The panel's brightness is around 300 nits, which is definitely too little to speak of full comfort in a heavily sunlit room. In such conditions, the PUS8560 simply needs to be complemented with blinds – otherwise, the picture starts to look quite washed out.

Thanks to the satin coating of the Samsung U8092F display, it handles reflections quite well. The screen doesn’t act like a mirror, and the colours – for a device of this class – remain fairly saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating alone can’t work miracles. The TV is just too dark to effectively shine through very challenging lighting conditions. If we place it opposite a light source (e.g. a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, we need to accept that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN256E_V056.002.127.051
T-KSU2EFDEUC-0090-1064.4, E2500007, BT-S
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Philips PUS8500

Samsung U8000F (IPS)

TV features

4.9/10

5.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Infrared
    Infrared
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Wyszukiwanie głosowe
    No
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Classic TV Features:

If you’re looking for a TV that, in the basic sense, “works” – the PUS8560 will fill that role. In terms of classic features, we have a rather minimalist set. On the plus side, there’s an electronic program guide (EPG), teletext, a backlit remote with a classic numeric keypad, and a headphone jack input. It sounds a bit like a dream set for seniors – and there’s some truth to that. However, it must be said clearly: this is a TV with very limited capabilities. We won’t find USB recording from DVB tuners here, and there’s no Picture-in-Picture mode or other conveniences known from more expensive models.

Smart TV:

How does SmartTV fare on the PUS8560? Well, it gets a bit trickier here. The PUS8560 runs on the Titan OS, which in this particular implementation posed significant issues. Some functions, though present “on paper,” simply didn’t work. For example: Wireless screen mirroring features like Chromecast or Miracast – we tried to activate them with several different phones and laptops… without success. Perhaps this will be fixed in the future, but at the time of testing – it didn’t work. Also, the speed of the system left much to be desired – switching applications or home screens was simply slow. A substantial portion of the functions in the menu seem to be heavily hidden in the depths of a poorly organised system. To make matters worse, the library of available applications is quite limited. Although the situation with apps is better than last year, it’s still far from ideal. A modern remote tries to save the situation – slim, elegant, backlit and really well-made. Unfortunately, it operates on classic infrared, so you have to aim it at the screen. The only exception is voice control, which works via Bluetooth… it’s just a pity it doesn’t support Polish.

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (although not all), a well-developed smart home support, and various additions, including exclusive Samsung applications. Features such as AirPlay and Chromecast are also included, allowing us to easily connect our phone to the TV and stream multimedia.

Unfortunately, as this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not decide to include a solar remote. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote that visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. When it comes to typical "TV" features – it misses recording functionality and the PiP (picture-in-picture) mode. On the positive side, though, the HDMI eARC works well, allowing for easy control of the included remote with devices like a decoder or soundbar – and it really works seamlessly.

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.7/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

PUS8560 handles most popular video and audio formats from USB memory without much hassle, so there's no need to elaborate on individual compatibilities. In everyday use, it should just work – and it does. The only thing worth noting is the handling of images. Although the television easily recognises popular extensions, with very high resolution graphic files, there are times when some images simply won't display. It might not be a major issue, but it's good to keep it in mind, especially if we want to view photographs straight from the camera. Besides that, PUS8560 shouldn't have any major problems playing files from USB.

Samsung U8092F handles playback of files quite smoothly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it doesn’t support Dolby Vision, but you simply won’t find that in any Samsung model.

There are some reservations regarding the support for external text files – the ones that users would like to add as subtitles to a film. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, and other extensions like SRT or SUB unfortunately did not work. This may not be an issue for everyone, but it’s worth knowing. Perhaps this is a problem to be improved in the future with a software update for the television.

Apps

4.6/10

8.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
No
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
No
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
No
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

6.2/10

5.7/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    6.2/10
    5.7/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    No

The television sounds quite pleasant, and it can confidently be said that the audio level will be fully adequate for most users – for both watching daily programs and enjoying an evening binge of a series. Moreover, it's a nice surprise that even in such an affordable Philips series, they decided to acquire licenses for full audio formats such as Dolby Atmos and DTS. This is great news for home theatre and soundbar owners, as it means complete compatibility and no need to "fiddle around" with connecting external devices.

U8092F doesn't pretend to have a home theatre on board. We get the standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds fine but lacks excitement, albeit with a bit of bass. For everyday viewing, this audio setup is more than adequate. We were pleasantly surprised that it managed to play a movie with the built-in Dolby Atmos (JOC) codec – though of course, we're not talking about true surround sound here.