TCL P7K / P79K vs Samsung S85F (WOLED)

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung S85F (WOLED)
$1 799

P7K / P79K

Info

S85F / FAU / FAE

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 65”77”83”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Android TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.8

7.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.1

    7.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.5

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.3

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    7.1

    8.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.6

    5.3

  • Utility functions

    7.0

    7.3

  • Apps

    9.6

    8.7

  • Sound quality

    6.2

    7.2

Advantages

  • Great black and high contrast

  • Support for 120 Hz in games (at lower resolutions)

  • Very low responsiveness (input lag), great for dynamic gameplay

  • Modern features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM

  • Efficient Google TV system with a huge app database

  • Very well-functioning Google Assistant in Polish

  • Easy screen mirroring from your phone (support for AirPlay)

  • Attractive price

  • Remarkable black and contrast

  • Great picture in SDR and HDR content after calibration

  • Very good motion smoothness – 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of features for gamers: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth

  • Advanced and smoothly operating Tizen system

  • Solar Remote with multiple features

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness, resulting in a weak HDR effect and the image being barely visible in sunlight

  • The picture loses quality and colors when viewed at an angle

  • Not suitable as a computer monitor due to very poor letter readability

  • Strong dithering effect (highly digital image)

  • No USB recording function and PiP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • No HGiG function*

  • Worse viewing angles, color gamut coverage, and lower brightness than the variant with the QD-OLED panel

*This function disappeared with the software update 1110.7 – we are monitoring this situation continuously.

Our verdict

The time has come to gather all observations. The TCL P7K / P79K is a television that cleverly juggles compromises, offering significantly more than we could expect in its price range. Its undeniable advantage is the VA panel, guaranteeing deep blacks and high contrast, and a surprisingly rich package for gamers (with VRR and 120 Hz support at lower resolutions) makes it a phenomenal choice for console owners. The whole package is tied together by the functional Google TV system. Of course, low peak brightness means that HDR content lacks spectacular highlights, and the TV's performance in sunlit rooms is limited. And while at its relatively low price, the P7K / P79K is quite a decent option, its biggest competitor turns out to be… its more refined sibling, the P8K. Often FOR a small extra charge, we get a device a class higher – with a native 4K 144 Hz panel, significantly better audio system, and generally higher build quality, which is reflected in its much higher rating on our portal. Therefore, the final verdict must be as follows: if your budget is absolutely non-negotiable, the P7K / P79K will be a good and cost-effective choice. However, if you can afford to add a small amount, the P8K model will offer significantly more and will ultimately be a more satisfying investment.

The Samsung S85F in the tested version with a WOLED panel is a television that should primarily be evaluated through the lens of its price. As expected from organic technology, it offers perfect, almost ideal black and infinite contrast in cinematic conditions. This feature alone will impress most buyers, especially those transitioning from any LCD television. However, it cannot be denied that in a direct comparison with the 55-inch QD-OLED variant, the WOLED version shows some weaknesses. It is slightly darker, especially in bright full-screen scenes, and offers noticeably worse viewing angles. Nevertheless, the rest of its advantages remain intact. Motion fluidity is at a high level – the 120 Hz panel handles both sports and action movies excellently. And if someone plans to connect a console to the S85F, they will receive a complete set of advantages: low input lag, variable refresh rate, Game Bar, and full HDMI 2.1 support. In everyday use, we were assisted by the Tizen system – closed but extremely refined. It reacts quickly, offers a rich selection of applications, and add-ons like AirPlay and voice control make it hard to find something more complete in this category. Indeed, the S85F in the WOLED version is not a perfect television and yields to its sibling with a QD-OLED panel. However, its greatest weapon is its absurdly low price. The cost of purchase is almost laughable in relation to the capabilities offered. It is still a great and, most importantly, affordable OLED that will be one of the best and most cost-effective televisions on the market for a vast number of users.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 3 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
Toslink (Optical audio)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.2/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

4,000:1

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

6,500:1

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

2,700:1

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

2,800:1

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

3,800:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail
Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

In the discussion about image quality, the conversation almost always starts with the issue of black depth and contrast, which are parameters defining the plasticity and realism of the observed world. And here, the TCL P7k/P79k immediately lays its strongest asset on the table – a VA-type panel. It is its construction that makes the native relationship between the brightest and darkest parts of the image more than satisfactory, especially in the context of the price segment that this model represents. In the majority of scenes, the achieved black has a noble depth, which allows for building an engaging viewer experience. To illustrate the scale, it is worth mentioning that competitive constructions based on IPS panels often offer results that are even four or sometimes five times lower, which constitutes a chasm in direct comparison. Of course, entering the territory of models oriented towards affordability, we must be aware of certain compromises. In the discussed television, we will not find an advanced local dimming system that could further enhance the impression of contrast. However, the absence of this feature is fully understandable and constitutes a logical consequence of positioning the product in the market – this technology in TCL's portfolio for 2025 has been reserved for higher-positioned, more prestigious series marked with the letter "C".

When it comes to black levels and contrast, we must be honest – this is the area where the differences between QD-OLED and WOLED panels are virtually nonexistent under typical cinematic conditions. We can confirm with full responsibility: the Samsung S85F equipped with a WOLED panel achieves incredible and unmatched results in this regard. Regardless of the scene being watched – whether it's a dynamic action movie or a dark thriller – we get infinite contrast and perfect black levels that we expect from any OLED television. These are results that can impress even the most demanding cinema lovers. It is worth emphasizing that such deep, absolute black can only be offered by televisions with organic panels. In film conditions, as we see in our measurements, the luminance level of black is zero. So, if you dream of a screen that can "turn off" the light in a scene just as effectively as an art-house cinema in a dark room, we are pleased to state that the S85F, also in the WOLED variant, is one of those televisions.

HDR effect quality

4.3/10

5.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 86.3%, Bt.2020: 65.0%
DCI P3: 97.0%, Bt.2020: 70.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

206 nit

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

297 nit

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

672 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

673 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

718 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

670 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

276 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review TCL P7K / P79K HDR effect quality
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review TCL P7K / P79K HDR effect quality
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review TCL P7K / P79K HDR effect quality
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) HDR effect quality

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

Review TCL P7K / P79K HDR effect quality
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S85F (WOLED)

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

TCL P7K / P79K

HDR luminance

When evaluating the HDR effect, we must make it clear and without marketing embellishment: the P7K/P79K is not and was never meant to be a master in this field. The maximum peak brightness that this panel can generate is only around 300 nits. This is a borderline value, a sort of thin red line between what can be considered a barely satisfactory HDR signal and what is really not much different from standard dynamic range (SDR), unfortunately leaning towards the latter. Synthetic tests found brutal confirmation in reality – our measurements taken during movie screenings showed that luminance in key bright parts of the content rarely exceeded the threshold of 200-250 nits. Therefore, this is not a television that would allow content produced in a wide tonal range to truly shine, and we must openly acknowledge that.

Unfortunately, the issue of color reproduction is presented equally restrained. Although the manufacturer positions this model in the "QLED" family, thanks to the use of a PFS LED filter, the results do not match the heightened expectations. The coverage of the wide DCI-P3 color gamut is only 86%. Compared to the market, this is at best an average result, as most devices that employ additional layers to expand the color spectrum easily achieve values at a minimum level of 90-92%.

For most of the time, let's say in 90% of film scenes, viewers won't see practically any difference between the S85F versions. When small but very strong light points appear on the screen – a lantern in a dark alley, a gunshot, the sun breaking through the clouds – this WOLED panel (like the smaller S85F) performs wonderfully. Our measurements showed peak brightness at around 750 nits. We can confidently state: this is an excellent result that guarantees fantastic HDR effects. The problem arises in a very specific, uncomfortable situation for any OLED. We're talking about the moment when the entire screen has to shine at full power brightly. Examples include a slide with a white background, a ski jump scene, or our test sequences (5) from the movie The Meg. And here, unfortunately, the results diverge quite significantly to the detriment of the WOLED panel variant. Our measurement equipment was able to measure a maximum of about 250 to 300 nits of brightness in such conditions. Just to be clear: the same model on a QD-OLED panel in the same test is almost twice as bright. The second issue: colors. And here we also have to be honest – QD-OLED has a design advantage. Why? It’s simple. QD-OLED creates colors from three components (red, green, and blue) and does not need an additional white subpixel. The WOLED panel we are testing uses this white subpixel mainly to boost overall brightness. The effect is that QD-OLED is able to show a slightly wider color palette, and the colors are a bit "cleaner." But let’s be clear: it’s not that the colors on this WOLED panel are bad! On the contrary, they are actually very good. Coverage of the DCI-P3 film palette at 97% and 71% for the wider BT.2020 palette is still a high standard. We just have to honestly admit that this few percent advantage in color coverage is on the side of QD-OLED technology and may be noticeable in very specific moments.

Factory color reproduction

5.9/10

5.5/10

Review TCL P7K / P79K Factory color reproduction
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Every reliable image quality assessment must begin by selecting the most optimal factory mode. In the case of the tested model P7K/P79K, the choice was confidently made for the "Film" mode. It is this mode that presents an image closest to the creators' intentions, avoiding both the exaggerated brightness of dynamic mode and the excessive dimming known from eco settings. And it must be admitted that, for a device in this price range, the factory calibration is surprisingly decent, although it is not free from a few stumbles. The most noticeable flaw turned out to be an imperfectly adjusted white balance. A slight dominance of the blue component gives the image a subtly cool, chilly character, thus deviating from the exemplary neutrality that the director wanted to show us. The television performs much better in reproducing the grayscale in a standard dynamic range – the gamma curve is executed almost perfectly. A minor reservation can only be made for the darkest parts of the image, where a slight deviation from the norm causes a loss of some detail in the shadows. The most serious challenge for TCL's software, however, was the interpretation of the HDR signal, which is illustrated by the EOTF curve. The television follows its own, rather free path here – the darkest details are disproportionately brightened, followed by a noticeable slowdown in brightness increase for midtones. Fortunately, most of these imperfections are software-related issues that can be eliminated. With this thought in mind, we proceeded to the professional calibration process.

When it comes to factory color reproduction, our test sample in SDR mode suffered from a slight deficiency in red and yellow color. This resulted in a subtle yellowish tint visible in the shades of white. However, this is not the biggest problem with the S85F. Similar to the QD-OLED panel variant, the biggest issue with this model is the way it presents HDR content. When we look at the EOTF curve graph, it is easy to see that the television has quite significant problems with overly brightening the image. This causes the final picture in many scenes to become very unnatural.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9/10

Review TCL P7K / P79K Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL P7K / P79K Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Color reproduction after calibration

The calibration process turned out to be a home run, especially in the context of standard dynamic range (SDR) content. We successfully managed to eliminate the TV's tendency to emphasize cool tones, restoring the whites to their natural neutrality. Furthermore, precise adjustments allowed us to correct a slight error in the gamma curve, so the darkest areas of the image regained their proper depth, without a trace of unnatural brightening. The effects are measurable and impressive – in the ColorChecker test, the vast majority of color reproduction errors fell below the perceptual threshold, achieving a deltaE value below 2. This is a result that would not shame much more expensive constructions. Unfortunately, in the case of HDR content, we hit a wall in the form of the inherent limitations of the panel itself. And although we managed to bring the colors in line, the software's specifics mean that the TV still adapts brightness in its own way, as evidenced by the persistent, non-standard EOTF curve. In summary, calibration brings tremendous added value, but one must be aware that it cannot overcome certain physical barriers. A slight boost in black levels, resulting from the lack of local dimming, and limited peak brightness mean that HDR content will not always be able to showcase its full potential. This is simply not the main task of this display; its true strength, especially after professional tuning, lies in the viewing of SDR materials.

After calibrating in Filmmaker mode, we managed to eliminate most of the unwanted effects. In SDR content, the television performs exemplary, and its color reproduction errors do not exceed a value of 2, which is an excellent result. A bit worse, although still very good, are the HDR quality contents. While we were able to eliminate a significant unnaturalness in the image caused by too high a positioning of the EOTF curve, the most discerning observers may notice that it is not perfectly aligned. It runs slightly below the reference curve, which would suggest that the S85F has slight issues showing all the details in the image. We must point out right away that it is highly unlikely that an average viewer would notice any shortcomings in the image. The final effect after calibration is rated as exemplary.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7.3/10

Review TCL P7K / P79K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL P7K / P79K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL P7K / P79K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL P7K / P79K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions

The issue of fluidity in tonal transitions, or popular grading, is another area where the P7K / P79K evokes mixed feelings and surprises with its dual nature. If we were to evaluate solely its ability to render smooth color gradients, we would undoubtedly give it a solid score of 8/10. Unfortunately, this positive image is marred by the use of very aggressive and unsightly dithering. This artifact is particularly noticeable on demanding test patterns – such as the one depicting an actor submerged in red water – where a rough, unnatural texture appears on uniform color surfaces, revealing the digital nature of the image. This is particularly disappointing as it is not a new issue. It seems to be a sort of legacy from previous generations of budget TCL models, which is a shame because it constitutes a flaw on what is essentially a quite competent image and is a mistake that could have been avoided.

Another issue with the S85F version featuring a WOLED panel, noticeable compared to the QD-OLED variant, is the quality of smoothness in tonal transitions. In very bright moments, it is evident that the blending of colors is not perfect and can sometimes be spotted with the naked eye. Although the overall quality of gradients is still good, certain issues with the panel produced by LG Displays are visible here, which are not as apparent in competing panels (QD-OLED).

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review TCL P7K / P79K Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review TCL P7K / P79K Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

After a series of harsh evaluations, fortunately, the time comes for praise, and this is due to the TCL AiPQ image processor for its work in digital processing and content scaling. It should be noted right away that we are not talking about the level known from flagship designs; nevertheless, in the price segment represented by the P7K/P79K, the results achieved are more than solid. The feature that smooths tonal transitions performs particularly well, effectively eliminating posterization, which are the characteristic bands often visible in materials with higher compression, such as from the YouTube service. The algorithm can elegantly remove unwanted gradients, which ultimately looks really good. The television also competently handles upscaling, which is the task of raising low-resolution materials to 4K standard. The output image, although it may seem a bit too sharp out of the box, fortunately, is not a problem. The software allows for easy adjustment of this parameter using a sharpness slider, so the final appearance can be easily tailored to personal preferences.

The processing of tonal transitions (gradients) in the S85F is at a high level. The television effectively handles posterization (the "stepping" effect of colors), even with heavily compressed materials, such as from streaming services. However, using this feature requires making a certain compromise. We noticed that the noise reduction algorithm is quite aggressive – even at the lowest setting, it can eliminate natural film grain, which for many viewers is part of the film's aesthetics. The "Standard" setting seems to be the golden mean, not causing visible loss of important details, so we can recommend it. However, we advise against using the "High" level, which removes not only noise but also desired details, such as texture or structure of objects on the screen.

The scaling (upscaling) process of lower resolution content works very well in the S85F. The image is sharp and clear. The only minor imperfection we observed is occasional, slight aliasing on the edges. The television also still exhibits characteristics typical of this manufacturer, such as active "overscan" (slight magnification of the image). This should be kept in mind, especially when watching older materials, as it may result in a minimal cropping of the original frame.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.8/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
50%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

The issue of fluidity and sharpness of the image in motion is inextricably linked to the fundamental parameter of the panel, and in the case of the TCL P7K/P79K, we are dealing with a panel that has a native refresh rate of 60 Hz. This specification already defines its capabilities and makes it difficult to unequivocally recommend it to enthusiasts of dynamic sports broadcasts. During rapid camera movements, the image loses sharpness, and the panel itself also shows a slight tendency to blur, which may be noticeable to more sensitive viewers. Fortunately, not everything in this aspect has been left to chance. The manufacturer has implemented a simple motion smoothing system, which is primarily used in film materials recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second. Thanks to a dedicated slider, the user can independently decide on the final character of the motion – from a fully cinematic, slightly juddery image to achieving a very smooth, almost theatrical effect. It is a simple yet effective tool that allows users to tailor the viewing experience to their own preferences.

The S85F is a model with impressive speed. The use of a 120 Hz OLED panel ensures that dynamic scenes, both in games and during sports broadcasts, meet expectations: smoothly, sharply, and without loss of clarity. A key role here is played by the instantaneous pixel response time, which is a natural advantage of OLED technology. Transitions between frames are instantaneous, and the image remains clear even during the fastest camera movements. Moving objects, like a ball on the field or a car in a chase scene, are clear and devoid of the characteristic motion blur typical of LCD panels (the so-called "tail").

Console compatibility and gaming features

6.7/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Although on paper the native 4K@60Hz matrix might suggest that the TCL P7K/P79K is not a TV tailored for gamers, the reality turns out to be surprisingly different. On the contrary, the manufacturer has ensured a rich package of features that make it a very friendly companion for next-generation consoles. Onboard, we find key technologies such as ALLM, which provides automatic switching to low-latency mode, and VRR, or variable refresh rate, which eliminates screen tearing. The list is completed by support for Dolby Vision Gaming and a simple yet functional Game Bar. However, the real and extremely pleasant surprise is something else. It turns out that the TV easily supports high refresh rate signals of 120 Hz, but at lower resolutions – 1080p and 1440p. This is fantastic news for console owners who know full well how rarely games run in native 4K at a full 120 frames per second. The ability to choose between higher resolution and doubled smoothness is therefore an extremely sensible compromise.

In summary, although the P7K/P79K may not be the target screen for the most avid tournament gamers, it offers a package of options for the casual or occasional console user that is hard to find among many competitors at this price point.

85F has practically everything on board to become the ultimate screen for gaming. It features four full HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, support for VRR (Variable Refresh Rate), and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode). Additionally, it includes a super-detailed Game Bar that clearly displays all key parameters. However, the true gem is the Game Motion Plus feature. This motion smoother dedicated to games makes animations more pleasant to the eyes while only slightly increasing input lag. This is a rare and well-functioning combination, deserving of high praise for Samsung.

And now comes the moment when we have to complain a bit. The absence of Dolby Vision in Samsung TVs has become standard, so there's no use hoping (unless something changes in the future). Unfortunately, it's much harder to explain the disappearance of support for HGiG after one of the software updates. HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) is a crucial mode that allows for precise brightness representation in HDR games, according to the developers' intent. Without it, HDR calibration on the console becomes less precise, which can result in images that are too dark in the shadows or overly bright in the highlights. Perhaps Samsung will fix this in the next update – we have high hopes for that. Because if HGiG returns, S85F will become an almost perfect gaming TV.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
10 ms
1080p120
10 ms
5 ms
2160p60
14 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
14 ms
2160p120 DV

Complementing this rich package for gamers is a parameter that has a direct impact on comfort and performance in gameplay – input lag. Even in native 60 Hz mode, the television boasts an excellent result of just 15 ms. However, the real magic happens when switching to 120 Hz mode, when the lag drops nearly in half, reaching values below 10 ms. Such responsiveness means that every command from the controller is transferred to the screen in the blink of an eye, something not only professionals will appreciate, but anyone who values smooth and immediate interaction with the game.

In this category, the S85F shows its true claws. The values measured by us – 5 ms at 120 Hz content and around 10 ms at 60 Hz – are results that can be described in one word in the world of televisions: phenomenal. This means that the response to a player's movements is practically instantaneous. Pressing a button on the controller results in action on the screen without any noticeable delay. In dynamic games, where a fraction of a second determines victory or loss, such values make a huge difference. There is no question of a nervous "waiting" for the picture to catch up with our commands. The S85F gives a sense of full control – and that is how it should be in equipment aspiring to be the ideal screen for gamers.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
16ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RWGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review TCL P7K / P79K Compatibility with PC
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Compatibility with PC

We finally come to an area that can undoubtedly be described as the biggest Achilles' heel of the TCL P7K/P79K – its cooperation with a PC. This is paradoxical because on paper, everything looks promising. The presence of G-Sync and support for high refresh rates at lower resolutions might suggest that it would also be a great monitor. Unfortunately, practice brutally verifies these assumptions. The key issue is the lack of support for full 4:4:4 chroma sampling. In everyday use, this translates to terrible font rendering quality – they, especially colorful ones, become jagged, surrounded by artifacts, and simply hard to read. This is not the end, as in PC mode, a significant issue with aggressive dithering also becomes evident, giving the entire image an artificial, overly digital appearance. The only consolation in this situation is the fact that in games, we can take advantage of additional hertz and G-Sync technology, but these are not benefits that could compensate for the fundamental shortcomings in displaying a static interface. The verdict is therefore clear: while it can still hold up as a screen solely for gaming on PC, in the role of a monitor for work or internet browsing, the P7K/P79K simply performs poorly.

And what about connecting to a computer? We are quick to answer: the S85F performs excellently in this role. The combination of instant input lag and a 120 Hz panel is a recipe for successful gaming on a PC. Both fast-paced shooters and more tranquil RPG titles benefit from the instant response and fluidity of the animations, which can draw you in for long hours. Of course, it’s not perfect. We must mention the specific construction of the WOLED panel. It consists of four subpixels (WRGB), which is a different structure than the classic RGB known from monitors. As a result, if we sit very close to the screen, we may notice that the fonts are not as perfectly sharp as we would wish. However, this is not a big issue and should not hinder everyday use, especially since the television correctly supports a chroma 4:4:4 signal.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

7.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
29%

When it comes to viewing angles, we enter a territory where VA matrix technology dictates inevitable conditions. As expected, this is the weak point of this model. It is enough to move away from the screen's axis to observe a gradual degradation of the image: colors begin to fade, contrast noticeably drops, and black loses its depth. In direct competition with IPS panels, which are renowned for their generosity in this aspect, the VA matrix must concede superiority to its competitor. Is there a plus side to this? Paradoxically, yes. Poor viewing angles are, in fact, the price we consciously pay for the fundamental advantage of this technology – a significantly higher native contrast and deeper blacks when viewed head-on. So, one could say that this is a television that favors the viewer sitting in the "ideal" spot, offering them a maximally vibrant image at the cost of universality.

As is typical for OLED technology, the viewing angles on the S85F are very good. The picture retains its properties even when viewed from the side, which is a clear advantage over most LCD TVs. However, we must point out that it does not reach the level known from QD-OLED panels. In the case of the tested WOLED panel, with a significant deviation from the screen's axis, a slight drop in brightness and a slight change in white tones can be observed. QD-OLED remains unparalleled in this regard, offering an almost perfect picture regardless of where you are viewing it from.

Daytime performance

4.6/10

5.3/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good
Review TCL P7K / P79K Daytime performance
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Daytime performance
Review TCL P7K / P79K Daytime performance
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Samsung S85F (WOLED): 305 cd/m2

TCL P7K / P79K: 299 cd/m2

The last practical test for any television is its daily performance in daylight conditions when it must compete with ambient light. In this competition, the TCL P7K / P79K has a slight advantage thanks to its satin screen coating. Its structure manages to quite effectively dampen direct reflections, dispersing them and protecting the image from excessive color fading or black brightness. However, passive combat with reflections is one side of the coin. The other is the active ability to "break through" bright surroundings, and here one of the key limitations of this model becomes apparent. The previously mentioned peak brightness of around 300 nits is simply too low to provide a fully comfortable and dynamic viewing experience in a brightly lit living room. In such conditions, the image may lack punch, and lower brightness scenes may lose clarity.

We must state clearly that working in a brightly lit room is not the strong suit of the S85F. We are dealing with a somewhat moderately bright OLED panel here. Our measurements have shown that the average brightness of the screen in "TV" mode hovers around 300 nits. For some users, this may be too low, especially in rooms with a lot of daylight. Of course, this TV is perfect for moderately bright living rooms. However, it is not a model we would recommend for exceptionally bright, sun-drenched interiors. This issue is compounded by the anti-reflective coating applied. We noticed that it does not suppress reflections from the surroundings as well as the variant with a QD-OLED panel does, especially when direct sunlight hits the screen.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
Software version during testing
V8-0008T01-LF1V441
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1110.7
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL P7K / P79K TV Panel details
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV Panel details

TCL P7K / P79K

Samsung S85F (WOLED)

TV features

7/10

7.3/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 3 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features

Smart Features – the Power of Google TV

The heart and brain of the TCL P7K / P79K is the Google TV system, which in itself is a huge advantage. This platform provides access to an almost endless library of applications from the Play Store, ensuring that we won't be missing any key streaming service. Integration with other devices is exemplary – Apple device owners will appreciate the seamless cooperation via AirPlay, while Windows and Android users will easily take advantage of the screen mirroring feature. It is also worth highlighting the Google Assistant, which performs fantastically with voice searches in Polish, remaining one of the most effective and convenient solutions of its kind on the market. The operation of the system on the tested model can be described as "average plus." The interface is mostly smooth, but during testing, it experienced occasional slowdowns and even sporadic "freezes" requiring a moment of patience. Minor hiccups are also visible in the translation of some system messages, which can be awkward – however, these are just small oversights on TCL's part, not affecting overall functionality.

Classic Features

In the age of smart systems, traditional television functions often take a back seat, and this is also the case here. A significant advantage is the inclusion of a classic remote control with a numeric keypad, which does not require precise aiming at the screen for communication, greatly enhancing user comfort. The presence of Bluetooth technology for connecting external devices, like headphones or speakers, should also be noted positively. However, this is where the list of conveniences basically ends. It is evident that TCL has placed nearly everything on the Google TV card, treating classic functions as an absolute minimum. Therefore, we will not find the option to record programs from built-in tuners to a USB drive or the once-popular PiP (Picture-in-Picture) feature. This is therefore a basic package that simply works, but does not offer anything beyond what is necessary.

Classic TV Features S85F

The S85F was not really designed with fans of classic television in mind. We won’t find the PiP (Picture-in-Picture) feature here (which is a bit surprising since Samsung usually offers it) or the ability to record programs to USB from built-in tuners. Fortunately, the basics are there – teletext and a clear channel guide – so it's perfectly adequate for ordinary, everyday viewing. The included remote, although simple and lacking a numeric keypad at first glance, allows for control of multiple devices. This means that when connecting, for example, a Canal+ decoder, you don’t need to have two remotes on the table – just the one from the TV is entirely sufficient.

SmartTV S85F: Tizen

The smart part is a completely different story. Tizen is one of the most advanced operating systems in televisions. It runs smoothly, supports all popular internet features – from screen mirroring, through AirPlay, to voice search. The strongest aspect of Tizen is its integration with the SmartThings app, which can serve as a control center for the entire home. Of course, like any closed system, Tizen has its limitations – such as a smaller app library compared to GoogleTV. However, looking at the current list of available applications, it’s hard to point out anything that might actually be missing.

Playing files from USB

7.2/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
Yes
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the P7k/P79k model is at least a puzzling case, putting us in quite an unusual situation. On one hand, its engine handles decoding most popular video formats, which is obviously good news. On the other hand, we encountered a surprising and irritating issue – the default application has a fundamental problem displaying Polish diacritical characters in subtitle files correctly. Instead of letters like "ą", "ę", or "ż", empty squares or random, unreadable symbols appeared on the screen. Fortunately, thanks to the flexibility of the Google TV system, this problem can be easily circumvented. Installing an alternative, advanced player, such as the reliable VLC or KODI, completely resolves this inconvenience. The situation is peculiar because this flaw did not occur in other TCL models we tested previously. We are therefore dealing with a clear software oversight, which, hopefully, will be fixed in a future update.

The built-in media player in the S85F performs excellently – practically everything you put on a USB drive or disk will be played without the slightest issue. Small gaps only appear in the support for some less popular photo formats, but for the vast majority of you, this will be more than sufficient. So it can be confidently said that the built-in player is more than solid for home use.

Apps

9.6/10

8.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

6.2/10

7.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    80dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

In terms of the built-in audio system, the TCL P7k/P79k presents a level that can be described as functional and correct, but lacking audiophile ambitions. The speakers play quite loudly, and dialogues in movies and TV shows are conveyed clearly and without distortion, which is crucial in everyday use. However, the soundstage definitely lacks a foundation in the form of low tones. This is a direct consequence of the absence of a dedicated subwoofer – an element that in the higher P8K series, with a large Onkyo subwoofer at the back of the cabinet, defined the strength of its sound. Here, that element is simply missing, making the sound seem flatter and lacking the depth that creates a cinematic atmosphere. We also noticed a peculiar feature in the software – when trying to set the maximum volume, the TV automatically reduces it. It's hard to conclusively determine whether this is a form of protection against distortion or a minor software bug; nonetheless, it's a pity, as the power reserves seem to be somewhat greater.

Built-in speakers with a power of 20 W on paper may not impress much, but in practice, the S85F can surprise. It sounds really pleasant, and at times you can even catch a subtle bass, which is not at all obvious in this class of speakers. The TV does not support the DTS format, which unfortunately has become a standard for most manufacturers by 2025. A nice surprise, however, is the support for Dolby Atmos. Of course, talking about "spatial" sound with two speakers placed at the bottom of the enclosure would be a bit of an exaggeration, but it's good that Samsung offers such a feature in this model at all.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video