Samsung QN85F vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Direct comparison

QN85F

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.6

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.3

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.1

    5.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    9.0

    6.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.9

    4.0

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    7.6

    6.2

Advantages

  • High HDR brightness (even 1700–1800 nits)

  • Very good contrast and deep blacks

  • 2 times higher number of dimming zones than its predecessor (55")

  • 144 Hz panel with VRR and ALLM support

  • Original Game Motion Plus feature – a unique smoother in gaming

  • Low input lag

  • Satin finish of the panel works great during the day combined with high brightness

  • Extensive Tizen platform: with AirPlay, SmartThings, and convenient solar remote

  • Beautifully designed base. Hybrid – can be a central stand or side legs

  • Solid sound with pleasant bass and Dolby Atmos support

  • Wide viewing angles (IPS panel)

  • Very low input lag (around 10-12 ms)

  • Smooth webOS 2025 system

  • Intuitive Magic remote with cursor

  • Better color gamut coverage thanks to NanoCell filter

  • Excellent as a PC monitor (sharp text, Chroma 4:4:4)

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG)

  • Extensive calibration options and natural colors after adjustments

  • Good image processing and efficient scaling of older content

  • Noticeable bass in the sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • No Dolby Vision and DTS:X support

  • No recording function from built-in tuners and PiP

  • Issue with HEIC files in the player

  • Poor black and low contrast

  • Low brightness (about 250 nits – weak for very bright rooms)

  • Panel refresh rate only 60 Hz

  • USB player without support for HEIC files and very large photos (over 20 Mpix)

Our verdict

The Samsung QN85F is a television that perfectly shows why the Neo QLED line was created in the first place. On one hand, it offers everything that a modern user expects – high brightness, excellent fluidity, and full support for gamers. On the other hand, it's still an LCD, which means a technology that requires certain compromises. The only question is whether these compromises actually interfere with everyday use? In practice, it’s hard not to be impressed by how the QN85F handles HDR movies. With a brightness level of 1700–1800 nits, when watching dynamic scenes, we truly feel the "HDR spark" that many competing televisions lack. The lighting effects in movies or series can literally overwhelm with intensity, while at the same time, the television does not lose details and doesn’t turn the whole image into a washed-out spot. This is the kind of spectacularity that viewers investing in a new screen are looking for. Gamers also have reasons to be pleased. There’s support for 144 Hz, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), and Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM). This is already a must-have in this class, but Samsung goes further and adds the unique Game Motion Plus feature. Thanks to this, the image in games becomes smoother, resembling the action of a motion smoother, but without a noticeable increase in latency. This is a solution that truly distinguishes the QN85F from the competition. On top of all this, there is everyday convenience. The Tizen system is fast, stable, and full of applications that we actually use – from Netflix, through Apple TV, to YouTube or Disney+. Additionally, it supports AirPlay, has an extensive SmartThings platform, and the remote, which instead of intimidating us with dozens of buttons, provides simple controls and quick access to the most important functions. This makes the QN85F a television that you just want to reach for every day. Of course, one could list shortcomings. There’s no Dolby Vision, no USB recording, or Picture-in-Picture, and the viewing angles typical of VA panels won’t impress if you sit at a large angle. But all of this pales in comparison to how universal and refined the QN85F is. During the day, it performs excellently in bright rooms, in the evening, it delivers cinematic emotions in HDR, and in games, it provides fluidity and low input lag that other models could envy. Overall, the QN85F is a television that not only successfully continues the cost-effectiveness tradition of its predecessor, the QN85D, but also develops it with several strong points. It's hardware that is hard to define as anything other than a "safe choice" – one that won’t disappoint in any scenario and is likely to meet the expectations of even the most demanding users.

LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed over the past few years. Aside from a new operating system, a refreshed remote, and a few marketing additions, we are dealing with practically the same design that we have known for years. Thanks to the nanofilter, the TV is capable of displaying better, cleaner colors than standard budget TVs, and the IPS panel guarantees really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay a very weak black level and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during nighttime viewings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model faces enormous competition not only from brands like TCL or Hisense but... at LG itself. The model we tested earlier, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider color gamut. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model loses its meaning – unless wide viewing angles are your only priority, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for them (at the cost of tragic blacks and a higher expenditure) is simply too high.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
Average
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7/10

1.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 240 (20 x 12)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

101,800:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

18,650:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

47,050:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

9,700:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Samsung QN85F Contrast and black detail
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung QN85F Contrast and black detail
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Contrast and black detail

Our editorial team received a 55-inch model with a VA panel. In the case of NeoQLEDs, which are TVs with Mini-LED backlighting, size is incredibly important because the larger the screen, the more local dimming zones it can have. This directly translates to higher contrast. In the variant we tested, we counted as many as 240 dimming zones, which is twice as many as in last year's QN85D. Theoretically, such an increase should bring an equally impressive improvement in contrast. Unfortunately, practice showed something different – the QN85F offers results very similar to its predecessor. Yes, in some scenes with a lot of black or in areas where details in the highlights are crucial, there is progress, but it is not proportional to the number of zones. Mini-LED technology can be capricious, and sometimes around small, bright objects, there are subtle halos. This is a typical compromise that one must accept with such a solution. Nevertheless, the contrast in the QN85F is at a very high level and will easily satisfy most users, even the more demanding ones. However, we have the impression that Samsung could refine the algorithms controlling dimming because we know from experience that they can perform really well in other models.

The NanoCell series, including the NANO81 model we tested, is based on an IPS panel. For anyone who has even a little knowledge about screens, this means one thing: significant problems with black levels and contrast. Our measurements are ruthless here. A result of 800:1 is, quite frankly, a tragic score. In practice, this means that what should appear on the screen as deep black looks like a dark gray blot at night. Watching dark films or series in a completely dark room will simply be torturous – the image will lose all its depth and will appear flat. If you decide to go with this model, we have one key piece of advice for you: don't watch it in complete darkness. To salvage the situation somewhat, it's best to leave a soft light on in the room, and the ideal solution would be to install an LED strip behind the television. Such wall lighting will trick your eye (this is known as simultaneous contrast) and make that grayness on the screen seem a bit darker. Nonetheless, the start of the test in terms of cinematic experiences looks bleak.

HDR effect quality

6.9/10

3.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 89.7%, Bt.2020: 69.8%
DCI P3: 87.6%, Bt.2020: 65.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

1248 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

860 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

1093 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

465 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

957 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

168 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

252 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Samsung QN85F HDR effect quality
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Samsung QN85F HDR effect quality
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Samsung QN85F HDR effect quality
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

HDR luminance

Samsung QN85F

HDR luminance

Although the more than double number of dimming zones compared to its predecessor has not translated into a spectacular jump in black levels and contrast, we definitely felt it in the HDR effect itself. The QN85F is up to 50% brighter than last year's model, making a huge impression in dynamic scenes. The peak brightness can reach nearly 1700–1800 nits, which is truly impressive in this Mini-LED class. The best part is that almost regardless of the scene being viewed, the HDR effect remains strong and vibrant. In four out of five test scenes, the brightness was around 1000 nits, a level that in most cases allows viewers to feel the true magic of this format. Of course, in scene number 4 from the movie Sicario 2, the limitations of Mini-LED technology become apparent – the brightness of the helicopter's spotlight drops to around 500 nits. It's not an outstanding result, but it's still much more acceptable than in last year's model. Samsung deserves applause, as the improvement in brightness in the QN85F is substantial compared to its predecessor. However, it's a pity about a certain trend seen in this year’s televisions – the manufacturer has worsened the color gamut coverage. Although the QN85F has a QLED panel, its result of around 90% DCI-P3 is average, and in the most demanding films, it can lead to less vibrant colors than in the predecessor. Despite this shortcoming, the overall HDR effect is at an excellent level and really makes a big impression in this class of devices.

If you're counting on HDR in the NANO81A to bring tears to your eyes, I have to disappoint you. This TV is simply too dark to show what this format is really about. With a brightness of just 250 nits, HDR here essentially exists only on paper. In practice, during a viewing session, it's very hard to distinguish whether we're watching high dynamic range content or regular SDR – it simply lacks that "punch" of light in bright areas of the image. But, to not have all criticism, we do have a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel – and it’s quite clear. It's about color gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it's not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. This is really a solid result that positions this model significantly above typical budget models based on regular white LED lights without any filters. Of course, it's still a bit lacking compared to the level of quantum dot TVs (QLED) or advanced panels with PFS filtering, but for this price range, the colors are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It's just a shame that this low brightness doesn’t allow them to fully "spread their wings" with the Nano filter.

Factory color reproduction

4.8/10

5.3/10

Review Samsung QN85F Factory color reproduction
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Samsung QN85F Factory color reproduction
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung QN85F offers several preset picture modes, but out of the box, the television starts in "Eco" mode. We could actually end the discussion here, because for such a model, using this setting makes no sense – the picture is washed out, unpleasant, and far from what we expect from a television of this class. Therefore, we conducted our tests in the best available mode, which is the Filmmaker mode. Its purpose is to faithfully reproduce what the directors saw while filming, and indeed, this setting performs best among all the factory options. However, this does not mean it is free of flaws.

Both in SDR and HDR, the QN85F strongly highlighted warm colors. This stemmed from a lack of white balance, with a noticeable absence of blue. Additionally, the picture sometimes appeared overexposed – both the gamma brightness characteristic and the EOTF curve indicated that the television has a tendency to blow out scenes. In SDR, the color reproduction errors (Delta E at levels of 4–5) were still acceptable, but in HDR, the inaccuracies became really significant and clearly deviated from what the creators intended to show us. Fortunately, Samsung provides a wide range of calibration tools in its televisions, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration to see how much could be improved.

For every movie fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. This mode is designed to display the image as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements." Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left something to be desired. The main issue turned out to be white balance. Measurements showed a clear deficiency of blue color, which practically translated to many scenes having a slightly yellowish, almost "too yellow" tint. The white was not perfectly clean, which detracted from the freshness of the image. Additionally, brightness management was not ideal either – the factory-set gamma was too low. The image often appeared oversaturated, as if it had been pulled too much from the shadows, losing its naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price segment, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration capabilities of this model are immense, which is a big plus for those who like to "dig around" in the menu. We decided to approach the topic in our own way and see how much we could extract from this panel with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

7.5/10

Review Samsung QN85F Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung QN85F Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Color reproduction after calibration

After calibrating the movie mode, we managed to tame the colors in both modes to nearly perfection – most of them did not exceed an error value of 3, which is the limit of visibility to the human eye. The image became more natural, fuller, and at the same time devoid of the blooming that was noticeable right after taking the TV out of the box. This shows how much potential lies in the QN85F and how well it responds to precise settings. However, this does not change the fact that certain technological barriers cannot be overcome. Despite the significant benefits of calibration, limitations of the panel itself still remain. Although the number of dimming zones has doubled compared to its predecessor, the algorithms controlling the backlighting can manipulate brightness in their own way. Sometimes this leads to slight color distortions or subtly visible halo effects around bright objects. Nonetheless, the reception after calibration is really pleasant and shows how good a screen the QN85F can be if we just take a moment for the right settings.

After calibrating the NANO81A, it's a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools even in such an inexpensive model deserves a big plus. We were able to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colors natural, juicy, and simply "true." In SDR content (such as regular TV, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks infinitely better – it's clear, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It's evident that this panel has considerable potential, which is simply wasted by poor presets out of the box. However, we have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it's about brightness management in HDR mode. The algorithm LG uses in this model is designed very conservatively. The television deliberately dims the image in HDR to avoid overexposing an already weak black from the IPS panel. The developers faced a choice: either provide more light and accept that black will turn light gray, or reduce the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Nevertheless, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is significantly better.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

9.3/10

Review Samsung QN85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung QN85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung QN85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung QN85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions

Minor color errors are practically unnoticeable; it is the smoothness of tonal transitions that is a category that even a less experienced viewer will notice. Unfortunate bands and artificial lines can completely ruin the perception of the image. Fortunately, the QN85F handles this aspect almost perfectly. Gradients are smooth, transitions between colors are seamless, and there are no artificial strokes or clear lines separating the hues on the screen. The image remains cohesive, and nothing distracts our attention from the content. Only under very extreme conditions did we notice slight issues in the gray palette, but this is a drawback typical of most televisions and it's hard to consider it a serious downside. In practice, while watching movies, we encountered no problems.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is an element where NANO81A really shines. LG proves here that it can refine image processing algorithms even in its cheaper models. During testing, we practically did not record the phenomenon of banding, that is, the annoying "steps" visible where one color should smoothly transition into another. Everything looks incredibly natural and smooth. This is especially evident in the bright scenes from the movie Kingsman, where the backgrounds remain clean and free from digital artifacts. However, even more impressive is how the television handles the extremely challenging, dark, and foggy shots in The Revenant. Where many budget panels falter and deliver ugly splotches instead of a smooth mist, the NANO81A maintains its composure, offering very velvety transitions. The only downside is that with darker shades, you will notice the weaker blacks of this TV rather than any issues with color transitions.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Samsung QN85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Samsung QN85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Although the native tonal transitions on the QN85F perform excellently with 4K materials, we don't always deal with content in the highest resolution. That's when it becomes crucial how the television handles upscaling and digital image processing. This process is managed by Samsung's proprietary processor – AI NQ4 Gen2. In practice, it works very efficiently. If visible color banding or other undesirable phenomena appear on the screen, for example in materials from YouTube, they can be easily smoothed out using the "noise reduction" function. Set to medium, it improves tonal transitions while not excessively blurring desired details. However, it's important to remember that – as with most Samsung televisions – this feature significantly affects the film grain. Therefore, during movie screenings, it's advisable to use it cautiously to maintain the natural character of the image.

The upscaling itself looks very good. Test materials in lower resolutions were displayed sharply and clearly, with a lot of detail. The only drawback remains the issue of overscan, which is cutting off the edges of the screen. In most situations, this is not noticeable, but with very old materials below HD quality, there may be instances where part of the image on the left side is slightly cropped.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels mercilessly bring all the "dirt" and imperfections of lower resolution materials to light. However, in the case of the LG NANO81A, the situation is quite different. It’s a really solid performer when it comes to handling content that is far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A big plus is the gradation reduction feature that you will find in the settings. It is exceptionally effective in combating color banding, which is a lifesaver when watching low bitrate materials, for example from some streaming services or older files from the internet. However, it is worth maintaining a certain vigilance. Since we are dealing with a less efficient chip than in LG's top models here, too aggressive an adjustment of this option can sometimes result in minor artifacts or a slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimentation with this feature – in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Blur and motion smoothness

7/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
68%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur ():

Motion blur and fluidity of motion in the QN85F is a topic worth discussing in more detail, as the television is equipped not with a standard 120 Hz panel, but with a 144 Hz panel. The additional hertz will primarily be appreciated by PC gamers, but the mere presence of such an option can be seen as a nice addition and a sign of the times – it’s hard to complain about the trend towards faster panels, since in practice, each of us would like the image to be as fluid as possible. However, the most important thing is how the television handles typical 120 Hz refresh rates – in the case of consoles, sports, or films recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second. And here, the QN85F performs really well. In movies, you can easily adjust the character of the image thanks to the “picture clarity” function, where we find two adjustable sliders. Key for viewing sessions is the one responsible for reducing motion blur. Lower values give the image a more cinematic character with preserved “frame rate,” while higher values lead to a strong smoothing that resembles television theater.

In terms of motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a few drawbacks. The TV is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz. If you're looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast-paced action games, you might feel somewhat unsatisfied. With such a low native refresh rate, fast-moving objects on the screen will always be a bit blurry.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Samsung QN85F makes a great impression in terms of features for gamers. It has four HDMI 2.1 ports, so we can easily connect several devices at once. There is also variable refresh rate (VRR) to prevent screen tearing, as well as automatic game mode (ALLM), which allows the TV to switch to the appropriate settings automatically when we start the console. Additionally, it supports refresh rates of up to 144 Hz – something that PC gamers will particularly appreciate, but the mere fact that such an option is available shows that Samsung is fully supporting gamers. The Game Bar panel deserves praise as well. It's a quick glance at key parameters – from frame rate to refresh mode to shortcuts for picture settings. Instead of sifting through the entire menu, everything is at our fingertips, which turns out to be really convenient in practice. However, the most interesting addition is the Game Motion Plus feature. It's nothing more than motion smoothing, transferred into the gaming world. When enabled, the picture becomes smoother, sometimes it even looks as though we're getting several more frames, and importantly, the response delay does not increase enough to interfere with gameplay. This solution truly sets Samsung's 120Hz TVs apart from the competition.

[UPDATE] We have updated our tests of Samsung TVs for the 2025 model year due to the release of software version 1131, which restored the crucial feature for gamers, HGiG.

The only serious downside remains the lack of proper HGiG support. This is a standard responsible for correct tone mapping in HDR games, ensuring that brightness and contrast are displayed as intended by the creators. Without HGiG, we have to adjust the brightness manually, which doesn’t always yield ideal results. The feature was available in previous models, but it disappeared from the QN85F after one of the updates. We hope that Samsung will quickly fix this issue, and we will keep checking to see if it has been resolved.

NANO81A is unfortunately not a device designed for e-sports. The lack of support for a 120 Hz signal is a fact that users planning to purchase this model must simply come to terms with. Nevertheless, LG engineers have worked hard to squeeze the maximum capabilities out of this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience. Above all, the television supports VRR technology (in the range of 48–60 Hz) and ALLM. As a result, the image remains stable and does not "tear," and the device automatically switches to low-latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from the console. Managing these settings is incredibly simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay that allows for a quick overview of parameters without leaving the game. A significant advantage is the support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles, as it enables the TV to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which unfortunately is a common issue in budget LCD televisions.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
13 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
16 ms
12 ms
2160p120
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
12 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The input lag on the QN85F is at a very high level. With content at 120 or 144 Hz, the values often oscillated below 10 ms, which is an absolutely remarkable result. Naturally, when playing at 60 Hz, the lag doubles, but it still remains low enough that in practice it is virtually unnoticeable. Thanks to this, the QN85F will be suitable for both dynamic e-sports games and calmer console titles.

In terms of response speed, the LG NANO81A performs exceptionally well. The input lag we measured is about 12 ms. This is a very low result, which means one thing for a gamer – the delay between moving the joystick on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically imperceptible. The television performs excellently in dynamic titles, where every millisecond matters, and in this regard, it does not fall behind significantly more expensive models.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
9ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No
Review Samsung QN85F Compatibility with PC
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Compatibility with PC

The QN85F performs really well in terms of cooperation with a computer. Thanks to the PC mode with a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz, support for G-Sync, and low input lag, gaming on a personal computer is very enjoyable and should not cause irritation even for more demanding players. The readability of fonts also looks good – the television supports chroma 4:4:4, so standard texts appear sharp and clear. A problem arises only with very thin letters. Regardless of the refresh rate setting – whether it’s 144, 120, or 60 Hz – horizontal, thin lines were hardly visible. Reducing the refresh rate slightly improved the situation, but never enough to say that they were displayed perfectly.

Nano81A is a really solid monitor for text work. Thanks to the IPS panel and proper implementation of Chroma 4:4:4, fonts are very clear and sharp – practically anyone will be satisfied with how this screen performs as a monitor. We only noticed one small detail that we caught with our laboratory scrutiny: vertical lines of dark text are slightly darker than those horizontal ones. However, this phenomenon is minimal enough that we decided not to deduct points for it. The ratings went down only for features typical for PC gamers – it lacks G-Sync support and high refresh rates above 60 Hz, which will be a significant drawback for those looking for a screen for fast-paced computer games.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

6.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
73%
66%

The viewing angles on the QN85F are a classic Achilles' heel of most LCD TVs with VA panels. When looking at the screen at an angle, there is a noticeable drop in brightness fairly quickly, and whites begin to gray out while colors lose their intensity. This is the price to pay for the high contrast that this technology offers. Samsung could have aimed for a better coating to widen the viewing angles in this model, but it is not found here. In practice, this means that the best viewing experience will be achieved when sitting directly in front of the TV, and any significant deviation will result in a clear loss of image quality.

This is the moment when the LG NANO81A can finally "breathe" and make up for the points lost in the black and contrast category. Thanks to the use of an IPS panel, the viewing angles are simply very good here. This is where the tested model gains the most and clearly shows its advantage over competing televisions equipped with VA panels. In practice, this means that the image does not lose quality, even when viewed from a wide angle. This makes the NANO81A a great option for those who have a wide furniture layout in their living room or frequently watch games and movies with a larger group.

Daytime performance

6.9/10

4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review Samsung QN85F Daytime performance
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Daytime performance
Review Samsung QN85F Daytime performance
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG NANO81A / NANO80A : 247 cd/m2

Samsung QN85F : 690 cd/m2

QN85F performs excellently during the day. The satin coating of the panel combined with high brightness makes it a television designed for bright rooms. Colors do not lose their intensity, and the image does not wash out even when a lot of light comes in. The television itself is bright enough to handle a living room with large south-facing windows without any problems. Thus, the QN85F provides an image that allows us to watch movies or games during the day without annoying reflections and the feeling that the picture is fading in the sunlight.

NANO81A is a relatively dark television, so it works best in rooms where you have control over the lighting. With a brightness reaching around 250 nits, it is hard to recommend it wholeheartedly for very bright, heavily sunlit living rooms – under such conditions, the image will simply lack punch. Nevertheless, LG deserves a small plus for the screen finish. The satin panel used here dampens reflections quite decently. As a result, even if there is a bit of light in the room, you won't see reflections of every detail from your surroundings on the screen. So, if you can slightly close the blinds, a daytime viewing experience will be quite possible, but this model was simply not designed to "fight" against full sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1126.0, E2540300, BT-S
33.21.62
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN85F TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details
Review Samsung QN85F TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details

Samsung QN85F

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

TV features

7.3/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F TV features
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F TV features
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F TV features
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features

Smart TV and Tizen System

The Samsung QN85F runs on the proprietary Tizen operating system, which has been one of the strongest points of the Korean manufacturer for years. The platform operates quickly, is comprehensive, and provides access to virtually all necessary applications. We have AirPlay support, the ability to mirror the screen, voice search, and a very clear interface. Everything is controlled by a remote with a minimal number of buttons, designed to give us quick access to the most important applications.

Classic TV Features

When it comes to classic television functions, the QN85F offers a rather basic set. The EPG interface is readable and easy to use, resembling a traditional teletext program list. A downside is the lack of USB recording and the absence of PiP functionality, which Samsung offered in many other models. This is because the QN85F uses single tuners. For some people, this may be a drawback, but looking at how few viewers today use traditional linear television, it will not matter much for most users.

SmartThings and Device Support

A strong element of the entire platform is the SmartThings application. With it, we can integrate the television with other home devices—not just those from Samsung. We can connect Philips Hue or Yeelight smart lighting, video intercoms, and many other devices to the system. SmartThings also allows us to control the television without using the traditional remote— we can use the app on our smartphone, mouse mode, or gesture control if we have a Samsung smartwatch. This makes the QN85F part of a larger ecosystem and fits excellently into the trend of the IoT smart home.

Smart Features: WebOS

One of the biggest advantages of the NANO81A model is its “brain,” which is the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS version for 2025, which in terms of fluidity and user experience is on par with the more expensive models of this brand. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure – there is no sign of irritating lags that often occur with budget competitors. All of this is thanks to the unique remote control with a pointer (cursor) function, which has undergone a visual makeover this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism – the new Magic remote is significantly smaller and more ergonomic than its predecessors. It sits perfectly in the hand, but this change has a downside as well. The physical number pad has completely disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming and selecting tiles, this will not be a problem. However, older household members, who are used to entering channel numbers from memory, will have to change their long-standing habits.

Everyday Use

In terms of features we would call “classic,” the NANO81A relies on proven standards. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic additions, but it performs flawlessly in everyday television tasks. The handling of traditional terrestrial or cable television, including the old good Teletext, is correct and intuitive. Wireless communication also deserves praise. The Bluetooth module works very reliably, allowing for quick and stable connections to game console controllers or wireless headphones and speakers. It’s simply a TV that “works” – it is stable, predictable, and does not create unnecessary complications in daily use.

Apps

9.3/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The player in the QN85F works as most people expect, supporting virtually all popular formats and is sufficiently capable even for more demanding users. Movies, music, photos – everything launches without issues. The only hiccup occurs with HEIC files, which are images from Apple devices. According to the specifications, they should work, but in practice, they simply do not open. Thumbnails are visible, but the file itself refuses to launch. This seems to be just a regular software bug. Apart from that one case, the player performs well and gives no reasons for complaints.

Many users still use their own USB drives to display movies or photos on the big screen. In this regard, the NANO81A performs quite decently – the built-in player supports a wide range of video and audio codecs, so most movie libraries will start up "right away." However, it is important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are limited to what the manufacturer has prepared for us. There is no possibility of installing alternative players (like the popular VLC), so if the system player cannot handle something, there is not much that can be done about it. During tests, we encountered a few specific limitations. Above all, there is a lack of support for HEIC files. If you take photos with an iPhone and want to view them directly from the USB drive, the TV simply will not see them – it's worth changing the format to JPG on your phone right away. We also noticed that the player has difficulty processing very large graphic files. Photos with a resolution of around 20–28 Mpix may not load or cause system errors. Aside from these exceptions, daily multimedia handling is hassle-free.

Sound

7.6/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The Samsung QN85F is equipped with a 2.2 system with a power of 40 W and performs really well for built-in speakers. The bass is pleasant, and the dialogues are clear and easy to hear even during louder scenes. Even at maximum volume, the television does not produce any unwanted vibrations, and nothing creaks. At the bottom of the housing, there is a subwoofer responsible for the bass, so it’s important to ensure that it is not obstructed during installation.

As for formats, the QN85F does not support DTS:X audio, which for Samsung has been a standard for several years now, forcing Blu-ray enthusiasts to connect audio devices first to the home theater and then to the television. In return, however, we get support for the more popular Dolby Atmos format, which can add extra space to the sound in movies and series.

When it comes to audio, the LG NANO81A pleasantly surprises compared to its higher-positioned sibling, the QNED80A model. Interestingly, NanoCell sounds slightly better, which is likely due to its somewhat thicker casing. The increased volume allows for the extraction of some low-end nuances – the bass may not be powerful, but it is more distinctly defined than in thinner constructions. However, one shouldn't expect miracles. It is still a standard 2.0 speaker arrangement with a total power of 20 W, so the overall sound characteristics remain similar to other models in this price range. The mid and high tones are acceptable, making dialogues in movies and news programs clear. While this slight improvement in the lower registers is pleasing, for true home cinema or music listening, it is still worth considering the purchase of at least a simple soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC