SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) vs LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED)
$1 797

S90F / FAE / FAT

Info

QNED93A / QNED90A

Info

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”77”83”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.2

7.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.3

    6.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.7

    6.9

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    9.6

    8.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.1

    6.2

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    8.2

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    7.4

    6.9

Advantages

  • Exceptional black and contrast

  • High brightness for an OLED TV - 1200 nits peak brightness

  • Very good motion fluidity - OLED panel 144Hz

  • Low latency - input lag 5ms

  • Gaming features: 4x HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, Game Motion Plus, etc.

  • PiP function and excellent support for external devices with a solar remote

  • Advanced operating system: Tizen

  • Pleasant sound with a slightly noticeable bass

  • Quite good contrast

  • High number of dimming zones

  • Good HDR brightness (about 1400 nits)

  • Wide color gamut coverage (about 96% DCI-P3)

  • 144 Hz mode and a full set of gaming features (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)

  • Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)

  • Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and readable fonts

  • WebOS with a rich selection of apps and voice control

  • Magic Remote

  • Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - great for older content like antenna TV or YouTube

Disadvantages

No like
  • Playback issues with some formats from USB.

  • Subtle degradation of tonal transitions (worse than the previous S90D)

  • No support for DTS:X – an external amplifier is required for full support of this format

  • Local dimming algorithms need refinement

  • Very average viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision does not bring a noticeable improvement over HDR10

Our verdict

The Samsung S90F is an excellent representative of the premium mid-range in the world of OLED televisions. Here we have an organic matrix that guarantees perfect contrast – and no matter how hard LCD manufacturers try with local dimming in Mini LEDs, this black simply cannot be replicated. The S90F displays its class here without any compromises. Compared to last year's model, we get a slightly brighter WOLED panel that can achieve up to 1200 nits in favorable conditions. This is a result sufficient for comfortable viewing of HDR content in most scenes at reference quality – especially on streaming platforms like Netflix. The picture quality is at a very high level, regardless of whether we are watching a movie, playing on a console, or streaming a sports event. In fact – versatility is one of the greatest advantages of this model. With a 144 Hz refresh rate, very low input lag, and a full set of gaming features (including functioning HGiG and the unique Game Motion Plus motion smoother), it's hard to find anything to complain about. The Tizen system worked really well on the S90F. It has its limitations – primarily a closed ecosystem and fewer app options than Google TV – but if you mainly use the most popular services, this shouldn't be a problem. A big plus is also the remote control, which can operate most connected devices – even without a numeric keypad. There are also downsides. The built-in media player has issues with some formats, and the anti-reflective coating typical for WOLEDs doesn't cope very well with strong light – reflections can be noticeable. We also don't have support for DTS and Dolby Vision, but that's a standard at Samsung that has been to be expected for years. So is the S90F with a WOLED panel the perfect television? No – but it really is just a few things short. It's one of the most refined and complete OLEDs in this price range, capable of handling any content, from a series on Netflix to gaming on a console, to a Sunday match.

LG QNED93A is a television that, at first glance, appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get a lot: a significantly larger number of dimming zones, a 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which still ranks among the most user-friendly operating systems. The QNED93A shines the most in gaming applications. Four fully functional HDMI 2.1 ports allow you to connect consoles and computers without any limitations, and the low input lag is maintained at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC gamers, an additional advantage is the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. So, it can be confidently said that in terms of gaming features, the QNED93A does not have any complexes compared to the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has long been regarded as one of the most convenient for everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows you to control the television like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness can also be considered a plus. At its peak, it manages to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is enough to ensure the picture doesn't fade in brighter rooms and that special effects in movies or games look convincing. The image processor does a good job of upscaling older content – television or films in lower resolutions appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.

However, it cannot be denied that the biggest problem with the QNED93A is the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of black, the screen can darken significantly, causing many details to simply disappear. The effect is such that contrast looks better at first glance but comes at the expense of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which typically enhances certain aspects of screens, but in this case, changes very little. The differences between dynamic and static metadata must literally be searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware, with its number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting, has the foundation for a better effect. So who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that works brilliantly as a home entertainment center, especially if you're thinking about gaming on a console or PC. In everyday television viewing and movie watching in well-lit conditions, it also provides a lot of satisfaction thanks to its high brightness and solid image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and when fully utilizing HDR, this model does not match its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been polished as it has in their OLED televisions.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)

Contrast:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

130,500:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

30,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

15,250:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

6,750:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

In the case of the Samsung S90F, we have an interesting situation: almost all size variants are equipped with WOLED panels, except for the 65-inch version, which received a QD-OLED panel. In this test, we analyze the version with the WOLED panel produced by LG Display, but the question is: does this affect the quality of black and contrast in this part of the test? In practice – it does not. Regardless of the technology used, both panels can generate perfect black and infinite contrast. This is exactly what we expect from any high-end television. Watching a series in the evening, in a completely dark room, is pure pleasure. The TV easily separates bright elements – like reflections or background lights – from deep, dark parts of the image, creating no halos or brightening, which still plague the highest-class LCD televisions. This is where OLED technology shows its strength – and the S90F is no exception. In terms of black and contrast, we can find absolutely nothing to criticize.

We took a close look at the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, equipped with a high-contrast VA panel. However, in the case of Mini-LED TVs, it's not just the panel itself, but primarily the number and operation of local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted as many as 308 zones, which already looks impressive from the start. For comparison – last year's QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only around 160. The difference is enormous and shows that LG has made a significant step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but practice quickly dampens the enthusiasm. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed impress – bright elements are clearly separated from black, and in many scenes, the depth effect truly pleases the eye. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in backlight construction, the results are not much better than in last year's model. The algorithms controlling dimming can be too aggressive. This is especially noticeable in darker sequences, where the screen dims to such an extent that subtle details disappear from view. Many viewers will appreciate the stronger black, but it is hard to ignore that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic are scenes with many small, bright elements. It is during these moments that typical halo effects, or glowing outlines, associated with LCDs featuring local dimming zones appear around them. This phenomenon does not completely ruin the experience, but it serves as a reminder that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we have the impression that the manufacturer did not pay enough attention to optimizing the new model when it comes to black and contrast.

HDR effect quality

7.2/10

5.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 70.1%
DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1099 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1177 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1252 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1183 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

577 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1330 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

219 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

678 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1016 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

HDR luminance

SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED)

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

Does the S90F handle not only dark scenes but also bright parts of the image? Definitely yes. Stories about OLEDs as "dark screens" can slowly be regarded as a myth. The Samsung S90F, similar to the LG C5 based on a very similar panel, achieves brightness exceeding 1000 nits. This is a value entirely sufficient to enjoy impressive and dynamic HDR images – both in movies and series. Most of the scenes we tested look stunning, with well-defined lights and high contrast. Of course, OLED technology still has its limitations – with very bright, full-screen sequences, such as the test card from the movie The Meg (5th image), the TV can noticeably dim the image. However, it's worth noting that such scenes are quite rare. One can say that the HDR effect is good enough that even mid-range OLED models, like the S90F, can provide a cinematic experience in the home living room.

Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A did not directly translate to a noticeably better contrast, one cannot deny that this model is brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real movie scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with white or bright lights, the screen was able to maintain high luminance, which produced a truly decent incredible HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the television could show its true class, namely in scenes that require precision, all the magic evaporates. The dimming algorithms we mentioned earlier are aggressive enough that small bright objects—such as distant lights, stars, or the moon—can almost completely disappear. Just look at the test scenes from the movie Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) to see how subtle details are dimmed to the brink of visibility. It's a shame, because a greater number of zones could theoretically lead to significantly better results. Fortunately, there are also stronger points. The QNED93A performs well in terms of color gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colors in movies look vivid and full, and the picture does not lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. So it can be said that the HDR in this model is solid, although the unfinished local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

6/10

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Samsung S90F, like most modern TVs, offers many picture modes, but – in line with our testing tradition – we checked it in its best one, which is the Filmmaker mode. As a result, the image looks much more natural than in the default, often oversaturated settings. It was neither overly saturated nor artificially subdued – just closer to what you should see. Of course, "more correct" doesn’t mean "perfect." Our S90F sample unfortunately had significant issues with white balance, particularly in the blue color range, resulting in a slightly yellowish filter applied to most scenes. Someone might say that it looks more "cinematic" – because it's warmer – but let's be honest, George Lucas didn't film Star Wars in sepia 😉 (you'll find the comparison with the scene as always below).

Additionally, in HDR materials, there was a noticeable issue with brightness management. The EOTF curve showed a distinct "spike" in brightness – the TV brightened the image more than it should have, making some effects look too intense and diverging from the reference. Thankfully, some of these issues can be eliminated with professional calibration – you can read about its effects later in the review.

In movie mode (specifically Filmmaker), color reproduction on the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although it wasn't without critiques. In SDR content, white balance leaned towards warmer tones, resulting in a slight yellowing across the entire screen. Gamma, on the other hand, led to a slight brightening of the image, making it look a bit less natural, especially in scenes requiring precise shading (this is evident in the comparison picture). This isn't a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the picture deviates from the aesthetic intended by the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation looked somewhat different. The white balance presented itself quite well here, ensuring that whites didn't lean towards pink or unwanted shades of green. However, brightness management proved to be an issue. Analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments the television can be noticeably too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some detail and reducing the realism of scenes. This detracted from the experience of HDR effects, which were theoretically supposed to be the most impressive. For this reason, we decided to carry out calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.2/10

7.8/10

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, we managed to eliminate almost all the aforementioned errors. Older movies in SDR quality finally look as they should – without the sepia effect or artificial aging of the image. The atmosphere of the classics is returning to its rightful place (you're welcome, Star Wars fans), and the colors no longer resemble an Instagram filter.

One of the key changes was also the improvement of brightness characteristics in HDR content. We managed to control the EOTF curve in an almost reference way. Yes, the most demanding users may notice minimal deviations in brightness, but to be honest – most viewers won't even notice that. And it’s no wonder, because the vast majority of errors are below the ΔE 3 threshold, which is below the visibility threshold. After calibration, the S90F (WOLED) becomes a truly excellent display – one that you can enjoy nearly perfect image quality on.

After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode on the QNED93A gained the most where it matters most in everyday use. It was possible to adjust the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality films. This makes colors look natural and pleasant, and the overall experience is much more comfortable. In HDR mode, we also made adjustments, but the biggest problem here turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG provides some leeway in the settings, the television still manages brightness on its own terms. It is evident that the local dimming algorithms are not entirely refined and can spoil the viewing experience by dimming parts of the image at inappropriate moments. Nonetheless, it is worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for daily viewing.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.3/10

8/10

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions

Well, here we have to honestly admit – the S90F has let us down a bit. Compared to last year's S90D model with a WOLED panel (very similar to the one used this year), this year's Samsung has performed worse. And not only in comparison to its main competitor, the LG C5, but even when set against its older brother. The biggest problems arise in dark scenes, where difficulties in smoothly blending colors are visible – the screen slightly struggles with tonal transitions, causing some parts to lose their naturalness. We don't know exactly what went wrong – maybe it's a matter of software or a different processing algorithm. It's a shame because we were hoping that last year's level would be at least maintained. Unfortunately, it’s a step back.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is really good. In most scenes, there are no artificial color divisions or banding effects. Dark shots are particularly surprising – this is where many TVs struggle, but here the image remains smooth and cohesive. In brighter sections, subtle color transitions can be observed, but they are not pronounced enough to draw significant attention. During testing, we encountered a clear issue with the DSE effect, also known as the "dirty screen" effect. On our unit, the phenomenon was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners noticeably darkened, giving the image a vignetted appearance. This could be a flaw of the test unit, but during intense viewing, it was hard to ignore.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Digital image processing in the S90F:

Fortunately, Samsung, as in most of its models, can effectively deal with the unwanted posterization effect in the S90F. The function responsible for this element is noise reduction, which quite nicely smooths out tonal transitions and eliminates unnatural color joins – of course, within its capabilities. Unfortunately, it works quite aggressively, so using it comes with compromises. In addition to improving gradation, it may also remove film grain or gently soften facial features. In this case, the choice is yours – do you prefer a more "clean" image, or do you care about preserving the original texture of the material.

Image scaling in the S90F:

In this year's model, Samsung has implemented its own AI processor – NQ4 Gen3, which really manages quite well with upscaling. In our test scenes, the television effectively "pulled up" lower-quality content towards artificial 4K – the image was more pleasant to view, and the differences in sharpness between native and scaled content were minimal. Unfortunately, behind this entire AI marketing façade lies a certain shortcoming. The S90F does not handle overscan well. If you reach for truly archival materials – like a VHS tape of your parents' wedding – you must reckon with the fact that the lower part of the image may be cut off. The image adaptation function to the resolution simply does not work here as it should.

LG QNED93A proves to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor handles scaling excellently, ensuring that even older movies or terrestrial television gain sharpness and detail. During the screening of "The Godfather," it's clearly visible how upscaling pulls extra details from the image – the characters' faces and the texture of the clothing appear much clearer than in the original material.

The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function for reducing unwanted color banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the "Medium" setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without over-interfering with the image. This way, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen doesn't appear unnaturally smoothed. Perhaps in some scenes, you can still notice slight color banding, but in practice, the effect is more favorable than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

7.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
49%
56%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

S90F really handles motion great – after all, it's an OLED with a 144 Hz panel, so sports and games look simply amazing on it. The picture is smooth, clear, and there's no room for ghosting or blurring that sometimes plagues cheaper LCDs.

The TV is also equipped with motion smoothing settings that allow you to tailor everything to your liking. We have motion blur reduction and judder reduction – you can set it up to make the picture super smooth (even to that soap opera effect), or more cinematic, with the classic "choppiness" of 24 frames. The choice is yours; Samsung doesn't impose anything.

LG QNED93A is equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly making their way into televisions can be seen as a positive development. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this regard, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the image through the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion character with visible frames and a fully smoothed theatrical motion.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.5/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

When it comes to gaming features – we have absolutely no complaints about the S90F. Aside from the lack of Dolby Vision, which is already the norm for Samsung. The TV operates at 144 Hz, has four HDMI 2.1 ports, so you can easily connect more than one console or PC. It also includes Game Bar – a practical tool that allows you to quickly preview picture settings, VRR status, ALLM mode, and other useful options. Game Motion Plus is also noteworthy – Samsung’s proprietary motion smoother, which uniquely works well in games. The image feels smoother without any artificial effects or slowdowns.

It’s also worth mentioning the HGiG feature, which – surprisingly – works correctly. We mention this because Samsung clearly broke something in one of its recent updates, and in some models, the option responsible for HGiG simply... disappears from the menu. Setting it becomes virtually impossible. Fortunately, our S90F unit did not have this issue, but the situation is dynamic, so it’s worth keeping this in mind and regularly checking for new software versions and information from the manufacturer.

LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been designed with gamers in mind. Right from the start, we get a complete package – all four HDMI ports operate at standard 2.1, so whether we connect a console, PC, or receiver, we can be sure of full compatibility. This is important because many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing prevents all equipment from having maximum capabilities. There’s also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console starts up, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This ensures that the image does not stutter or tear, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.

The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is sufficient for consoles, in the case of PCs, the QNED93A allows for even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, which makes a difference especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in games – the television supports the HGiG mode, which provides guidelines to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as intended by the game developers. For dessert, we get Game Bar – a special informational strip invoked on the screen that shows parameters in real-time. You can check the frame rate, active VRR functions, or input lag levels. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts, but for anyone who wants to quickly verify what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
16 ms
1080p120
6 ms
7 ms
2160p60
11 ms
16 ms
2160p120
6 ms
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
15 ms
2160p120
5 ms
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
21 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms

The input lag on the S90F is at a truly monitor-level. In the best conditions, a result of 5 ms was achieved, which is absolutely outstanding – even a reference for the most demanding gamers. Whether you are playing fast-paced shooters, fighting games, or simply need instantaneous response – the S90F does not disappoint in this aspect at all.

In the latency field, the LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of. The TV responds instantly to our actions, which is evident from the first tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, meaning nearly instant response – shots, passes, and precise movements of the stick immediately translate to the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result slightly increases to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the full comfort zone. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for games, which works with the Xbox Series X on the QNED93A. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a deterioration, but in practice, it’s still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
5ms
7ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWBG
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Compatibility with PC
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Compatibility with PC

The S90F is a great tool for both PC gaming and everyday work. Gamers can sleep easy – the television easily supports image synchronization with NVIDIA graphics cards thanks to G-Sync, and the 144 Hz refresh rate combined with very low input lag just confirms this. The S90F also works well as a monitor for text work. Of course, the readability of fonts may be slightly affected by the characteristic pixel structure in the RWGB layout, but this is a topic well known mainly to those who work with large amounts of text, code, or spreadsheets in Excel. For most users, this will be completely acceptable.

A new feature in this year's model is full support for 144 Hz refresh rate, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, and with AMD products, where it supports FreeSync Premium Pro. This ensures smooth gameplay without screen tearing or stuttering, and the panel itself performs very well in dynamic esports titles and demanding AAA productions.

Equally important is the clarity of the image in everyday work. The television supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and applications are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a small detail - with a dark background and bright letters, subtle horizontal lines may appear due to the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the comfort of using the television on a daily basis, but perfectionists may notice it after spending more time with text. But we don't think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen with text sitting less than 1 meter away from it 😉.

Viewing angles

7.4/10

2.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
31%
78%

The viewing angles on the S90F are very good, although it's fair to admit that they slightly lag behind the 65" version with the QD-OLED panel. Nevertheless, the picture quality at a wide angle is very good – colors remain vivid, and brightness does not drop drastically when viewed from the side. There is no need to shift the TV toward you to see a clear image. For most users, this level is completely sufficient.

QNED93A uses a VA matrix, and that means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at an angle of about 45 degrees, brightness drops by as much as 80%, and colors begin to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast that VA panels offer. There is no additional coating to improve angles, as found in some more expensive models, so the QNED93A looks best when viewed directly. If you are planning a large family viewing, where some viewers will sit more to the side, you should expect that the image will not be as attractive as it is at the center of the screen.

Daytime performance

6.1/10

6.2/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Daytime performance
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Daytime performance
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) Daytime performance
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2

SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED): 405 cd/m2

S90F is really bright for an OLED TV. Of course, it can't be compared to Mini-LED TVs or the brightest high-end OLEDs, but under normal lighting conditions, it's easy to watch something during the day. The brightness is high enough that you don't need to close the curtains every time you watch a movie or a series. However, it's important to remember that the anti-reflective coating on WOLED panels is not the best. Reflections can be visible, especially with bright light coming in from the window. In such cases, it's best to reach for curtains.

LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix that handles reflections moderately well. It is certainly not at the level of matte screens, but it doesn't have the mirror-like effect seen in models with a glossy surface. As a result, reflections are not too bothersome, and colors maintain their intensity even when light from the window hits the screen. Brightness is also a plus. The average level in HDR mode stays within 550-600 nits. This means that the television performs well in well-lit rooms, and you can enjoy a viewing experience even during the day when the blinds are only partially closed. In the role of a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A really performs well.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
T-RSMFDEUC-0090-103 2.5, E2500007, BT-S
33.20.74
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) TV Panel details
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details

TV features

7.7/10

8.2/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features

The Samsung S90F is equipped with many classic TV features such as EPG, CI module, and headphone support, but there's also something more here. Thanks to the presence of several tuners, the television offers a picture-in-picture (PiP) function – very useful, for example, when we're watching one match but want to glance at the score of another one happening simultaneously. It's a shame that Samsung has completely abandoned USB recording for some time now, but it somewhat compensates for this with good integration with decoders and other devices. The remote – although small and lacking a numeric keypad – allows control of many devices connected to the television. We can easily operate a decoder, amplifier, console, or other equipment with it, and this can be done without the need to reach for multiple remotes.

As for the Smart TV system – Tizen on the S90F works very smoothly, which is not always the case with cheaper models featuring this system. The system itself is extensive and offers plenty of features – we have screen mirroring, AirPlay, Bluetooth device support, and many options related to smart home control, such as managing light bulbs or other smart devices directly from the television. However, it's important to remember that Tizen is a closed system, so when it comes to apps – we are limited to what we find in the Samsung store. While this store is quite extensive, it does not match the flexibility of the Google TV platform. It's worth keeping this in mind if you have specific needs for niche applications.

Smart Features

QNED93A operates under webOS, one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It includes AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is reasonably clear and mostly fast, although in the tested unit, there were instances where the response to pressing the remote required a moment of "thought." However, it is hard to consider this a serious issue – webOS remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates to improve it even more.

Classic Features

In this model, LG did not include the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the TV itself performs excellently as a screen for everyday viewing of antenna channels. The EPG interface is clear, the TV offers a television guide, and we have the ability to record programs from the built-in tuners directly onto a USB drive. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We only missed the PiP function, which in 2025 is offered by just two manufacturers.

Magic Remote

The Magic remote is still the biggest difference compared to the competition. In 2025, it underwent a slight facelift – it has fewer buttons and resembles the minimalist remotes from Samsung a bit. However, the cursor remained key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It’s incredibly simple yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is much faster, and it’s hard to switch back to classic buttons afterwards.

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the S90F is fine and supports a good number of popular formats. Unfortunately, during testing – once again – we encountered issues despite the manufacturer's claims. The TV did not play some formats that are supposedly supported, such as HEIC photo format (Apple's version) or SRT and SUB text subtitles. In the daily use of most people, such a player is probably sufficient to run a movie from a USB drive, but it's worth keeping in mind that surprises can happen. Perhaps the situation will improve in future updates, but at the time of writing this review – it works as it works.

The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats without any issues, so it’s perfectly sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor hiccups. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which is Apple’s photo format. The manufacturer claims that the television should open them, but in practice, we were unable to confirm that. The second issue involved text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, other, more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it's hard to consider this a real limitation in everyday use.

Apps

8.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

7.4/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The S90F sounds really pleasant, with noticeable bass and quite good dynamics. A definite plus is the support for Dolby Atmos, which allows the television to sound a bit more "spatially" – of course, as much as the built-in 2.1 system allows 😉. Unfortunately, as with Samsung, there is no support for the DTS:X format. So if you want to take advantage of its capabilities, you need to connect the audio equipment directly to the receiver, not to the television itself – otherwise, it simply won’t work.

LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for the built-in speakers in the television. The sound is fairly clear, and at moderate volume levels, vocals and dialogues come across distinctly. The bass, as is usually the case in relatively slim constructions, is not the strongest, but its presence can be felt and is completely sufficient for everyday viewing of series. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and does not lead to strong distortions, although in more demanding cinematic scenes, it's noticeable that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as acceptable and not off-putting. It definitely won't compete with a soundbar, but it also won't ruin your movie experience.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC