SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) vs LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Direct comparison

S90FAE

Info

QNED93A / QNED90A

Info

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”77”83”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.2

7.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.3

    6.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.7

    6.9

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    9.6

    8.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.1

    6.2

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    8.2

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    7.4

    6.9

Advantages

  • Remarkable black and contrast

  • High brightness for an OLED TV - 1200 nits peak brightness

  • Very good motion fluidity - OLED panel 144Hz

  • Low latency - input lag 5ms

  • Gaming features: 4x HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, Game Motion Plus, etc.

  • PiP function and excellent support for external devices with a solar remote

  • Extended operating system: Tizen

  • Pleasant sound with a slightly perceptible bass

  • Quite good contrast

  • High number of dimming zones

  • Good HDR brightness (around 1400 nits)

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (around 96% DCI-P3)

  • 144 Hz mode and full set of gaming features (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)

  • Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)

  • Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and clear fonts,

  • WebOS with a rich assortment of apps and voice control

  • Magic Remote

  • Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - it will work great for older content such as antenna TV or YouTube

Disadvantages

No like
  • Issues with playback of certain formats from USB.

  • Subtle blending of tonal transitions (performs worse than its predecessor S90D)

  • Lack of support for DTS:X – an external amplifier is required for full support of this format

  • The local dimming algorithms require refinement

  • Very average viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision does not offer a significant improvement over HDR10

Our verdict

The Samsung S90F is an excellent representative of the premium mid-range in the world of OLED televisions. Here we have an organic matrix that guarantees perfect contrast – and no matter how hard LCD manufacturers try with local dimming in Mini LEDs, this black simply cannot be replicated. The S90F showcases its class without any compromises. Compared to last year's model, we get a slightly brighter WOLED panel that, under favourable conditions, can achieve even 1200 nits. This is a result sufficient for comfortable viewing of HDR materials in reference quality for most scenes – especially on streaming platforms such as Netflix. The picture quality here is at a very high level, whether we're watching a film, gaming on a console, or streaming a sports event. In fact, versatility is one of the biggest advantages of this model. With a refresh rate of 144 Hz, very low input lag, and a full set of features for gamers (including working HGiG and the unique Game Motion Plus smoothing), it’s hard to find fault with anything here. The Tizen system performed really well on the S90F. It has its limitations – primarily a closed ecosystem and fewer app options than on Google TV – but if you mainly use the most popular services, this shouldn’t be an issue. A big plus is also the remote control, which can operate most connected devices – even without a numeric keypad. There are also downsides. The built-in media player occasionally has issues with certain formats, and the anti-reflective coating typical of WOLEDs does not handle strong light very well – reflections can be noticeable. We also lack support for DTS and Dolby Vision, but this has been the standard at Samsung that one could expect for years. So is the S90F with a WOLED panel the perfect television? No – but it really isn't missing much. It’s one of the most refined and complete OLEDs in this price range, capable of handling any content, from a series on Netflix, through gaming on a console, to a Sunday match.

The LG QNED93A is a television that, at first glance, appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get quite a lot: a significantly larger number of dimming zones, 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which remains one of the most convenient control systems. The QNED93A shines particularly in gaming applications. Four full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports allow for connecting consoles and PCs without any restrictions, and the low input lag remains consistent at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC users, an additional advantage is the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. Therefore, it can be confidently said that in terms of gaming features, the QNED93A holds its own against the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has long been regarded as one of the most user-friendly in everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows for controlling the television like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness can also be considered a plus. At its peak, it managed to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is sufficient for the picture to remain vibrant in brighter rooms, and for special effects in films or games to look convincing. The image processor handles scaling of older content well – television or films in lower resolution appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.

However, it cannot be denied that the biggest problem with the QNED93A lies in the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of black, the screen can dim significantly, causing many details to simply disappear. The effect is such that contrast appears better at first glance, but at the cost of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which usually improves certain aspects of screens, yet in this case, it makes little difference. The differences between dynamic and static metadata literally have to be searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware itself, with its number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting, provides grounds for a better result. So, who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that works excellently as a home entertainment centre, especially if you're considering gaming on a console or PC. In everyday television viewing and films in well-lit conditions, it also delivers a lot of satisfaction due to its high brightness and decent image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and full HDR utilisation, this model does not match its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been refined as well as in their OLED televisions.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)

Contrast:

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

130,500:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

30,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

15,250:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

6,750:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

In the case of the Samsung S90F, we have an interesting situation: almost all size variants are equipped with WOLED panels, except for the 65-inch version, which has a QD-OLED panel. In this test, we analyse the version with the WOLED panel produced by LG Display, but the question remains; does this affect the quality of black levels and contrast in this part of the test? In practice – it does not. Regardless of the technology used, both panels can generate perfect black and infinite contrast. This is exactly what we expect from any top-tier television. Watching a series in the evening, in a completely dark room, is pure pleasure. The television easily separates bright elements – such as reflections or background lights – from deep, dark parts of the picture, without creating any halos or brightening effects, which top-of-the-line LCD televisions still struggle with. This is where OLED technology shows its strength – and the S90F is no exception. In terms of black levels and contrast, we cannot fault it at all.

We examined the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, equipped with a high-contrast VA panel. However, in the case of Mini-LED televisions, it is not just the panel itself, but primarily the number and operation of local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted as many as 308 zones, which already looks impressive from the start. For comparison, last year's QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only about 160. The difference is enormous and shows that LG has made a serious step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but practice quickly cools the enthusiasm. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed be impressive – bright elements are clearly separated from blacks, and in many scenes, the depth of the image truly pleases the eye. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in the backlighting design, the results are not much better than in last year's model. The algorithms controlling the dimming can be too aggressive. This is especially noticeable in darker sequences, where the screen dims to such an extent that subtle details disappear from view. Many viewers will appreciate the deeper blacks, but it is hard not to notice that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic are scenes with many small, bright elements. It is then that the typical halo effects, meaning glowing outlines, characteristic of LCD with local dimming zones appear around them. This phenomenon does not completely ruin the experience, but it reminds us that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we have the impression that the manufacturer did not pay enough attention to optimising the new model in terms of blacks and contrast.

HDR effect quality

7.2/10

5.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 70.1%
DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1099 nit

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1177 nit

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1252 nit

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1183 nit

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

577 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1330 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

219 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

678 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1016 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

HDR luminance

SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED)

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

Does the S90F handle not only black, but also bright parts of the image? Definitely yes. Tales of OLEDs as “dark screens” can slowly be regarded as a myth. The Samsung S90F, like the LG C5 based on a very similar panel, achieves brightness exceeding 1000 nits. This is a value entirely sufficient to enjoy impressive and dynamic HDR imagery – both in films and series. Most of the scenes we tested look superb, with well-defined highlights and high contrast. Of course, OLED technology still has its limitations – in very bright, full-screen sequences, such as the test pattern from the film The Meg (picture 5), the television may noticeably dim the image. However, it should be emphasized that such scenes are rare. It can be considered that the HDR effect is good enough that even mid-range OLED models like the S90F can provide a cinematic experience in the home living room.

Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A has not directly translated to noticeably better contrast, it is hard to deny one thing about this model – it is brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real film scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with white or bright lights, the screen could maintain high luminance, which created a truly decent amazing HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the television could showcase true class, that is in scenes requiring precision, all the magic dissipates. The dimming algorithms, which we mentioned earlier, operate so aggressively that small bright objects – such as distant lights, stars, or the moon – can almost completely disappear. A glance at the test scenes from the film Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) shows how subtle details are dimmed to the limits of their visibility. It's a pity, as a greater number of zones could theoretically have led to significantly better results. Fortunately, there are also strengths. The QNED93A performs well in terms of colour gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colours in films appear vivid and full, and the picture does not lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. Therefore, one could say that the HDR in this model is solid, although the underdeveloped local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

6/10

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung S90F, like most modern televisions, offers many picture modes, but – in line with our testing tradition – we assessed it in the best one, which is the Filmmaker mode. This way, the image looks significantly more natural than in the default, often oversaturated settings. It was neither overly saturated nor artificially muted – just closer to what should be seen. Of course, "more correct" does not mean "ideal". Unfortunately, our S90F unit had considerable issues with white balance, especially in the blue range, resulting in a slightly yellowish filter being applied to most scenes. Someone might say it looks more "cinematic" – because it is warmer – but let's not kid ourselves, George Lucas did not film Star Wars in sepia 😉 (you will find the comparison with the scene as always below).

Additionally, in HDR materials, there was a noticeable issue with brightness management. The EOTF curve showed a clear "spike" in brightness – the television brightened the image more than it should have, which made some effects look overly intense and diverged from the reference. Fortunately, some of these problems can be eliminated through professional calibration – you will read about its effects later in the review.

In filmmaker mode, the colour reproduction on the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although there were some reservations. In SDR content, the white balance was shifted towards warmer tones, which gave the screen a slight yellowish tint overall. The gamma, in turn, led to a slight brightness increase, making the image appear somewhat less natural, especially in scenes requiring precise shading (this is clearly visible in the comparison photo). This is not a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the image deviates from the aesthetics intended by the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation was somewhat different. The white balance, in this case, was quite good, ensuring that the whites neither leaned towards pink nor unwanted green hues. However, managing brightness turned out to be an issue. An analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments, the television could be noticeably too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some detail and lowering the realism of the scenes. This spoiled the reception of HDR effects, which were theoretically supposed to make the biggest impression. For this reason, we decided to carry out calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.2/10

7.8/10

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, we managed to eliminate practically all the previously mentioned errors. Older films in SDR quality finally look as they should – without the sepia effect or artificial aging of the image. The atmosphere of the classics returns to its rightful place (you’re welcome, Star Wars fans), and the colours no longer resemble an Instagram filter.

One of the key changes was also the improvement of brightness characteristics in HDR content. We managed to control the EOTF curve in almost a reference manner. Yes, the most demanding users may spot minimal deviations in brightness, but honestly – most viewers won’t even notice that. And it's no wonder, because the vast majority of errors are below a ΔE value of 3, which is below the threshold of visibility. After calibration, the S90F (WOLED) truly becomes an excellent display – one that provides nearly perfect picture quality.

After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode on the QNED93A has improved primarily in areas that matter most on a daily basis. We managed to correct the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which is what we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality films. As a result, the colours look natural and pleasant, making the overall experience much more comfortable. We also made adjustments in HDR mode, but here the biggest issue turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG offers some flexibility in the settings, the television still manages brightness on its own terms. It is evident that the local dimming algorithms are not fully refined and can ruin the viewing experience by darkening parts of the image at inappropriate times. Nevertheless, it is worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for everyday viewing.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.3/10

8/10

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions

And here we must honestly admit – the S90F has somewhat let us down. Compared to last year's S90D model with a WOLED panel (very similar to the one used this year), this year's Samsung has performed worse. This is not only in comparison to its main competitor, the LG C5, but even when put alongside its older sibling. The biggest problems arise in dark scenes, where difficulties with smoothly blending colours are evident – the screen slightly stepped the tonal transitions, causing some parts to lose their naturalness. We don’t know exactly what went wrong – perhaps it’s a matter of software or a different processing algorithm. It's a pity, as we were hoping that the level from last year would be at least maintained. Unfortunately, it is a step backwards.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is truly impressive. In most scenes, there are no artificial colour separations or banding effects visible. The dark shots are particularly surprising in a positive way – it is precisely in these that many televisions struggle, yet here the image remains smooth and coherent. In brighter segments, one can note subtle colour blending, however, they are not pronounced enough to significantly distract the viewer. During testing, we encountered a clear issue with DSE, or the so-called "dirty screen" effect. On our unit, the phenomenon was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners visibly darkened, giving the impression of vignetting. This may be a flaw of the test unit, but during intense viewing, we found it hard to overlook.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Digital Image Processing in the S90F:

Fortunately, Samsung, as in most of its models, effectively manages the unwanted posterisation effect in the S90F. The feature responsible for this aspect is noise reduction, which does a decent job of smoothing tonal transitions and eliminating unnatural colour connections – of course, within its limitations. Unfortunately, it operates rather aggressively, so using it comes with compromises. In addition to improving gradation, it can also remove film grain or gently soften facial features. In this case, the choice is yours – do you prefer a more "clean" image, or do you want to preserve the original texture of the material?

Image Scaling in the S90F:

In this year's model, Samsung implemented its own AI processor – NQ4 Gen3, which does quite well with upscaling. In our test scenes, the television effectively "pulled up" lower quality towards artificial 4K – the image was more pleasant to view, and the differences in sharpness between native and scaled content were minimal. Unfortunately, behind all this AI marketing facade lies a certain shortcoming. The S90F struggles with overscan. If you reach for truly archival materials – e.g. a VHS tape of your parents' wedding – you must expect that the lower part of the image may be cut off. The image adaptation function to resolution simply does not work here as it should.

The LG QNED93A proves to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor handles scaling extremely well, which means even older films or terrestrial television benefit from increased sharpness and detail. During the screening of "The Godfather," it is clearly visible how upscaling retrieves additional details from the image – the faces of the characters and the texture of their clothing appear much clearer than in the original material.

The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function for reducing unwanted colour banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the "Medium" setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without excessively interfering with the image. As a result, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen does not appear artificially smooth. It is possible that in some scenes slight colour banding can still be observed, but in practice, the effect is more beneficial than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

7.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
49%
56%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The S90F really handles motion excellently – after all, it’s an OLED with a 144 Hz panel, so sports and games look absolutely stunning on it. The image is fluid, clear, and there’s no room for any ghosting or blurring that sometimes plagues cheaper LCDs.

The television is also equipped with motion smoothness settings, allowing you to customise everything to your preference. We have motion blur reduction and judder reduction – you can set it so that the image is super smooth (even to that soap opera effect), or more cinematic, with the classic 24-frame 'choppiness'. The choice is yours; Samsung doesn’t impose anything.

The LG QNED93A is equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly making their way into televisions can be viewed positively. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this respect, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the picture using the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion character with visible frames and a complete smoothing with theatrical motion.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.5/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

When it comes to gaming features – the S90F has absolutely nothing to fault. Aside from the lack of Dolby Vision, which is already the norm for Samsung. The television operates at 144 Hz, has four HDMI 2.1 ports, so you can easily connect more than one console or PC. Onboard, we also find the Game Bar – a practical tool that allows you to quickly glance at picture settings, VRR status, ALLM mode, and other useful options. Game Motion Plus also deserves a mention – Samsung's proprietary motion enhancer that is the only one truly functioning sensibly in games. The image appears smoother, but without any artificial effects or slowdowns.

It is also worth mentioning the HGiG feature, which – much to our slight surprise – works correctly. We're mentioning this because Samsung clearly broke something in one of the last updates, and in some models, the option responsible for HGiG simply... disappears from the menu. Setting it up becomes practically impossible. Fortunately, our S90F unit did not have this issue, but the situation is dynamic, so it's worth keeping this in mind and regularly checking for updates and information from the manufacturer.

LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been prepared with gamers in mind. Right from the outset, we get a complete set – all four HDMI ports operate in standard 2.1, so regardless of whether we connect a console, PC or amplifier, we can be assured of full compatibility. This is important, as many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing hinders the entire equipment from having maximum capabilities. There is also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which automatically switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console is turned on, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This ensures the picture doesn't stutter or jerk, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.

The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is sufficient for consoles, in the case of PCs, the QNED93A allows for even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, and this makes a difference, especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in gaming – the television supports the HGiG mode, which are guidelines to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as the game developers intended. To top it off, we get Game Bar – a special information bar that appears on the screen, showing parameters in real-time. You can monitor the frame rate, active VRR functions, or the level of input lag. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts but for anyone who wants to quickly check what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
16 ms
1080p120
6 ms
7 ms
2160p60
11 ms
16 ms
2160p120
6 ms
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
15 ms
2160p120
5 ms
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
21 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms

The input lag on the S90F is at a level akin to that of a monitor. In optimal conditions, a result of 5 ms was achieved, which is an absolutely stunning outcome – even a benchmark for the most demanding players. Whether you are playing fast-paced shooters, fighting games, or simply value instant response – the S90F does not disappoint in this regard at all.

The LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of when it comes to latency. The television responds instantly to our actions, as seen in the initial tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, which means almost immediate response – shots, passes, or precise movements of the joystick are instantly reflected on the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result rises slightly to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the bounds of full comfort. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for games, which in the QNED93A works with the Xbox Series X console. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a detriment, but in practice, it is still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, the gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
5ms
7ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWBG
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Compatibility with PC
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Compatibility with PC

The S90F is a great tool for both gaming on PC and everyday work. Gamers can rest assured – the television effortlessly supports image synchronisation with NVIDIA graphics cards thanks to G-Sync, and the 144 Hz refresh rate combined with very low input lag only confirms this. The S90F will also serve well as a monitor for text work. Of course, the readability of fonts may be slightly compromised by the characteristic pixel structure in the RWGB layout, but this is a topic well known mainly to those who work with large amounts of text, code, or spreadsheets in Excel. For most users, this will be perfectly acceptable.

A new feature of this year's model is the full support for 144 Hz refresh rates, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, as well as with AMD products, where it operates with FreeSync Premium Pro. As a result, gameplay is smooth, without stuttering or tearing, and the panel itself performs very well in dynamic esports titles and demanding AAA productions.

Equally important is the clarity of the image for daily work. The television supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and applications are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a small detail – against a dark background with bright letters, subtle horizontal stripes may appear, resulting from the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the convenience of using the television on a daily basis, but perfectionists might notice it after prolonged exposure to text. But we don’t think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen with text sitting less than 1 meter away from it 😉.

Viewing angles

7.4/10

2.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
31%
78%

The viewing angles on the S90F are very good, although it must be admitted that they are slightly inferior to the 65" version with a QD-OLED panel. Nevertheless, the picture quality at wide angles is excellent – colours remain vivid, and brightness does not drop drastically when viewed from the side. There is no need to move the television towards you to see a clear image. For most users, this level is more than sufficient.

QNED93A uses a VA panel, which means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at an angle of about 45 degrees, brightness drops by as much as 80%, and colours begin to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast that VA panels offer. There is no additional coating to enhance angles here, as in some more expensive models, which is why the QNED93A performs best when viewed head-on. If you are planning a large family screening where some viewers will sit more to the side, you must take into account that the picture will not be as attractive as it is in the centre of the screen.

Daytime performance

6.1/10

6.2/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Daytime performance
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Daytime performance
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Daytime performance
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2

SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED): 405 cd/m2

S90F is really a bright television for an OLED. Of course, it is not worth comparing it to Mini-LED televisions or the brightest high-end OLEDs, but under normal lighting conditions, it is quite easy to watch something during the day. The brightness is high enough that you don't need to cover the windows every time you turn on a film or series. However, it is important to remember that the anti-reflective coating on WOLED panels is not among the best. Reflections can be visible, especially with bright light coming in from the window. In such a case, it's best to reach for curtains.

LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix, which handles glare suppression moderately well. It is certainly not on the level of matte screens, but it does not have the mirror-like surface feel of models with a glossy finish. As a result, reflections are not overly distracting, and the colours maintain their intensity even when light from a window strikes the screen. The brightness also scores positively. The average level in HDR mode hovers around 550–600 nits. This means that the television performs well in well-lit rooms, allowing viewers to enjoy a film even during the day, with the blinds only partially drawn. In the role of a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A performs quite well.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
T-RSMFDEUC-0090-103 2.5, E2500007, BT-S
33.20.74
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) TV Panel details
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details

TV features

7.7/10

8.2/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features

The Samsung S90F is equipped with many classic television features, such as EPG, CI module, and headphone support, but there's also more to it. Thanks to the presence of several tuners, the television offers a picture-in-picture (PiP) function – very useful, for example, when we are watching one match but want to take a glance at the score of another one happening simultaneously. It's a shame that Samsung has completely eliminated the USB recording function for some time now, but this is partly compensated by good integration with set-top boxes and other devices. The remote control – although small and lacking a numeric keypad – allows for the control of many devices connected to the television. We can easily operate a set-top box, amplifier, console, or other equipment with it – and all without the need to reach for multiple remotes.

As for the Smart TV system – Tizen on the S90F operates very smoothly, which is not always the case with cheaper models featuring this system. The system itself is comprehensive and offers a lot of functions – we have screen mirroring, AirPlay, Bluetooth device support, as well as many options related to smart home integration, such as controlling light bulbs or other smart devices directly from the television. However, it is important to remember that Tizen is a closed system, so when it comes to apps – we are limited to what we find in the Samsung store. And while this is quite extensive, it does not match the flexibility of the Google TV platform. It's worth keeping this in mind if you have specific needs for niche applications.

Smart Features

The QNED93A runs on webOS, which is one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It comes with AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is quite clear and mostly fast, although in the tested unit, there were instances where the response to pressing the remote control required a moment of "thought". However, it's hard to consider this a serious issue – webOS still remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates that will enhance it even more.

Classic Features

In this model, LG has not included the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the television itself performs excellently as a screen for everyday viewing of channels from the antenna. The EPG interface is readable, the television offers a TV guide, and we have the ability to record programmes from the built-in tuners directly onto a USB stick. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We only missed the PiP feature, which in 2025 is offered by just two manufacturers.

Magic Remote

The Magic remote is still the biggest difference compared to competitors. In 2025, it underwent a slight facelift – it has fewer buttons and resembles the minimalist remotes from Samsung. However, the cursor remains key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It's incredibly simple, yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is much faster, and it's difficult to then switch back to traditional buttons.

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the S90F is adequate and supports a fair number of popular formats. Unfortunately, during testing – once again – we encountered issues, despite the manufacturer's claims. The television did not play some formats that are supposedly supported, such as HEIC format photos (the Apple version), or SRT and SUB subtitles. In everyday use for most people, such a player is sufficient to play a movie from a USB drive, but it's worth keeping in mind that surprises may occur. Perhaps the situation will improve in future updates, but at the time of writing this review – it works as it works.

The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats without any issues, so it is quite sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor oversights. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which is Apple's photo format. The manufacturer claims that the television should be able to open them, but in practice, we were unable to confirm this. The second issue concerned text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, the other more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it's hard to consider this a real limitation in everyday use.

Apps

8.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

7.4/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The S90F plays really quite pleasantly, with noticeable bass and quite good dynamics. A definite plus is the support for Dolby Atmos, which allows the television to deliver a slightly more "spatial" sound – of course, to the extent allowed by the built-in 2.1 system 😉. Unfortunately, as is often the case with Samsung, there is a lack of support for the DTS:X format. So, if you want to take advantage of its capabilities, you need to connect the audio equipment directly to the receiver, rather than to the television itself – otherwise, it simply won't work.

The LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for built-in speakers in a television. The sound quality is fairly clear, and at medium volume levels, vocals and dialogues come across clearly. The bass, as is often the case in relatively slim designs, is not the strongest, but its presence can be heard and is entirely sufficient for everyday viewing of series. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and does not lead to strong distortions, although during more demanding cinematic scenes, it's evident that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as decent and not off-putting. It certainly won't compete with a soundbar, but it won't ruin your film experience either.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC