Haier M95E vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

M95 / M95EUX

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 65”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.1

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.9

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.6

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    7.8

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.6

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    8.5

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    3.6

    7.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    9.2

    6.5

Advantages

  • Phenomenal sound: Built-in audio system from Harman Kardon

  • Very high brightness: up to 1700 nits

  • Good panel for gaming and sport: 144Hz, low motion blur

  • Low input lag: below 10 ms (at 120Hz)

  • Full gaming package: Two HDMI 2.1 ports, support for 4K@144Hz, VRR (G-Sync) and ALLM provide a solid foundation for consoles and PC

  • Great tonal fluidity: The television handles gradients and colour transitions excellently

  • Wide colour gamut (QLED): 96% DCI-P3 coverage ensures vivid and saturated colours

  • Support for Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Very good contrast and black levels: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Fairly high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional gaming modes: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide selection of apps

  • Supports multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from the built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very underdeveloped dimming algorithms are the biggest disadvantage. The Mini LED zones "dance" on the screen.

  • Clunky Google TV system: The entire interface operates slowly, has annoying stutters, and encounters errors.

  • Non-functioning motion smoother in films.

  • Average performance with PC: At 120Hz and 144Hz, the television struggles with sharp font display.

  • Very high price considering the current state of the product.

  • The matrix has significant smearing

  • Strongly visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor bugs in the system

  • Great chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

Our verdict

Haier M95E is on paper a television that looks like the dream come true for any "bargain hunter". When we look at the specifications – a Mini LED panel with hundreds of zones, a powerful brightness exceeding 1500 nits, a QLED 144Hz matrix, phenomenally low input lag, and sound branded by Harman Kardon – everything screams "flagship!". We are dealing with equipment that theoretically should challenge the most expensive players on the market. Unfortunately, if you read our review carefully, you will need to pay close attention, as there is one word that recurs almost in every paragraph: "but...". And it is this word that perfectly summarises this model. M95E is a television of gigantic contradictions and wasted potential, where nearly every advantage is brutally countered by a fundamental software flaw. So we have hundreds of dimming zones, but the algorithms controlling them create a distracting disco on the screen. We have phenomenal HDR brightness, but the television completely fails to manage tone mapping and burns out details. We have an ultra-fast, smooth 144Hz panel, but motion smoothing systems for films practically do not exist. We have a great package for gamers, but without HGiG and with problems displaying fonts. Finally, we have fantastic sound, but wrapped in a clunky and annoying Smart TV system. This is why the Haier M95E is such a frustrating device. It is a story of fantastic hardware that lacked the final, most important polish – refined software.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. Indeed, in many respects, it is a successful piece of equipment: thanks to Mini-LED backlighting, we get good blacks and brightness that competes with more expensive models. In fact, it is identical to the slightly pricier C6K model that we have already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich gaming features that make it enjoyable to play even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the overall impression is tarnished by the performance of the panel used. The television struggles with noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital grain) causes the image to often appear unnatural and artificial – as if it were being overly sharpened. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS is not its flaws, but its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model finds itself in a strange "middle ground." It costs almost the same (or slightly less) as the fully-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete construction without those annoying errors. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition – if its price drops drastically. For the moment, a significantly safer and better option remains paying a (often nominal) premium for the C6K model. One could cynically state that the letter "S" in the name indeed stands for "Slim." Only it does not refer to an exceptionally slim chassis, but to how much this model has been "trimmed" in terms of features compared to the full-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.8/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 576 (24 x 24)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

152,100:1

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

36,400:1

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

37,800:1

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

13,850:1

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail
Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Getting to the heart of the matter, namely the assessment of black levels and contrast, we must begin with specifications that evoke genuine admiration on paper. The Haier M95E is a Mini LED construction, equipped in its 65-inch version with an impressive grid of 576 independent dimming zones (a symmetrical layout of 24x24). When we combine this technology with a VA panel, renowned for its native deep blacks, our expectations for image depth instantly rise. And indeed, as long as we feed the television with static test patterns, everything looks phenomenal. The contrast measurements are so remarkable that the M95E almost throws down the gauntlet to the most expensive players in the market. Unfortunately, this admiration lasts only until we switch on the first random piece of film material.

As soon as motion appears on screen – and we’re not even talking about wild chases, but rather ordinary dialogue or a camera transition – a fundamental weakness of the rudimentary backlight control algorithms comes to light. If you remember our tests of the Xiaomi S MINI-LED 2025 model, the story dangerously circles back. The dimming zones seem to have a life of their own, throwing a kind of "light disco". Chaotic flashes and visible backlight pumping are unfortunately very distracting and spoil the viewing experience, creating a huge HALO effect. Importantly, we conducted tests on the "High" dimming setting. It turns out that in our unit, this was the only mode in which the zones could undertake any meaningful work in HDR content, without causing a drastic drop in overall brightness. All of this leads to one conclusion: the M95E has enormous, yet completely untapped hardware potential. Clearly, there has been a lack of hours spent refining the software, which forced us to lower the score in this key category.

Let’s move on to what tigers like the most, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) results from drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black and contrast. In a direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model barely falls short at all. Just like in the higher series, we have a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. Interestingly – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones (in the same size) in the C6KS as in the more expensive counterpart we tested! Black levels perform very well. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major flaws that often plague budget constructions without local dimming. Of course, we can’t cheat physics. It’s important to consider that in very demanding scenes (e.g. bright text on a black background), we may occasionally notice undesirable effects, such as blooming (the halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – generally, the black levels are at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

6.8/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.9%, Bt.2020: 80.4%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

1224 nit

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

662 nit

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

1143 nit

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

568 nit

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

898 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Haier M95E HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Haier M95E HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Haier M95E HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Haier M95E HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

HDR luminance

Haier M95E

HDR luminance

If there is one category in which the Haier M95E absolutely shines, it is the HDR effect, driven by the raw power of the backlighting. This television cannot be denied the fact that it is a truly bright device. In both most film scenes and during our synthetic measurements, the panel easily achieved, and often even exceeded, the threshold of 1200-1500 nits. This has a direct impact on the viewing experience – the image has a punch and genuinely allows one to feel the magic of materials recorded in this format. However, one must be aware of a certain compromise. When exceptionally demanding scenes appear on the screen, full of small but intense points of light, the M95E does not lose its resonance or dim, but pays a different price for it. A very strong and noticeably distracting halo effect is generated around these bright elements. It is clear here that the algorithms controlling the dimming have been programmed to prioritise brightness and the visibility of the smallest details, even if this comes at the expense of pristine blacks. We are not entirely convinced that this is the healthiest approach; nonetheless, it must be acknowledged that the overall capabilities of the M95E in this regard are indeed significant. A huge advantage is the fact that we are dealing with a Mini LED QLED type construction. The use of a layer of quantum dots brings measurable benefits in the form of wide coverage of the colour palette, which in our tests reached nearly 96% of the DCI-P3 space. This guarantees that the television has full predispositions for displaying vibrant and properly saturated colours.

And what about HDR? Here, the C6KS performs quite well and – as has become a recurring theme of this review – identically to the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect, and generally, the video materials look good here. However, one must keep in mind the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g., stars) appear against a dark background, the television can dim them quite significantly. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible blacks. This is quite a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, "true black" more than additional micro-details, the display of which could cause the screen to appear greyed out. This is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of it. It is also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the slogan of QLED technology. Thanks to this, the colours are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide colour gamut reaches as much as 92% here.

Factory color reproduction

4.6/10

5/10

Review Haier M95E Factory color reproduction
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Each television is primarily evaluated based on its default cinema mode – in this case, "Movie" – which theoretically should be the "best" and most faithful upon being taken out of the box. Unfortunately, in the case of the Haier M95E, the word "best" is certainly not synonymous with the word "good." Already during SDR viewing, the picture revealed evident problems: white balance skewed too much to red, and excessive, unnatural colour saturation led to visible colour deviations. What’s worse, the M95E also struggles with brightness management (gamma curve), excessively darkening the entire scene. Such behaviour is hard to commend, as it directly leads to details merging into shadows that are irrevocably lost in a black blob.

However, the real disaster occurred after switching to HDR material, while still remaining in "Movie" mode. It’s hard for us to guess who came up with such a fantastic idea – or perhaps it was simply a complete oversight of this stage by Haier's engineers – but instead of cinematic fidelity, the picture began to resemble a garish "Dynamic" mode. The white balance exposed immense problems with the blue colour, which in turn resulted in unnatural sharpening and artificial over-saturation of the entire scene. As if that weren’t enough, the EOTF curve characteristics mercilessly revealed that the television also has fundamental issues with local dimming management in this setting. We have not calibrated many Haier models in our career, but we already know for sure that the M95E definitely needs such calibration.

Unlike the more expensive C6K model, the tested C6KS does not have an option in the menu labelled as Filmmaker Mode. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests have shown that in practice, in terms of colour reproduction, the lack of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers an almost identical picture characteristic to the aforementioned Filmmaker in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. Therefore, if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K gives you better colours – the answer is no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

6/10

7.5/10

Review Haier M95E Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier M95E Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Color reproduction after calibration

The calibration process left us with extremely mixed feelings. On the one hand, we noted considerable success in the area of colour accuracy. By using the available options in the menu, we managed to tame the white balance and bring it down to an acceptable level. As a result, SDR content finally freed itself from the irritating red dominance, and the HDR image no longer resembled a vibrant, shop display mode. We also succeeded in clearly adjusting the entire colour palette and its saturation – perhaps not perfectly, but as much as the software allowed, and the difference was visible to the naked eye.

And unfortunately, this is where our list of improvements essentially ends, as the M95E simply did not allow for more. As we indicated earlier, most settings related to image brightness do not respond to our commands at all. This means that we were unable to grasp its fundamental characteristics in any way – neither the gamma curve nor the EOTF. In practice, the television in SDR content still tends to darken details, as confirmed by the elevated gamma, merging details in the shadows. Meanwhile, the EOTF curve in HDR mode still ruthlessly exposes all the aforementioned problems with chaotic local dimming management. And although the calibration process itself yielded a lot, removing most of the colour issues, in the end, we had to capitulate.

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the C69KS's tendency to distort colours has been effectively limited, resulting in a very good final effect. After calibration, we will no longer see excessive warming of scenes in SDR or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it is worth noting the brightness characteristics. In SDR content, it is hard to have any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, television programmes, or materials from YouTube. It is significantly more challenging to evaluate the television's performance in HDR. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behaviour, but its practical variant reveals certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times, it can dim the entire scene. Thus, calibration brought clear benefits in terms of colour quality, but certain limitations resulting from the local dimming operation and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be overlooked, as we also saw in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.4/10

4.8/10

Review Haier M95E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M95E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M95E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M95E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions

We now move on to the category that has turned out to be one of the strongest points of the tested model. The fluidity of tonal transitions, or the ability to smoothly blend closely related shades, is at a very high level here. The Haier M95E excels at reproducing gradients, even in the most demanding dark scenes, where many televisions can already show unsightly banding (posterization). Although we did manage to notice minimal shortcomings in very bright parts of the image, these are errors so minor that they do not spoil the overall excellent impression. In this particular competition, the M95E deserves one of the highest ratings on our portal.

Looking solely at the fluidity of tonal transitions, the C69KS offers no real cause for complaint. The colour gradation is executed correctly, and more challenging sequences do not reveal significant problems. So you may be surprised by the low rating in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," leading to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final rating is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Review Haier M95E Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Haier M95E Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Well, what happens to those colour connections when a lower quality material full of compression artifacts comes on screen? Unfortunately, we have some bad news for you. Although the menu contains an option responsible for smoothing tonal transitions in older content, we definitely DO NOT RECOMMEND using it. Its activation causes an avalanche of additional, hideous artifacts and noticeably blurs the entire image, and what's funniest – it often doesn't even remove those unwanted "jaggies" it was supposed to fight against. This function might as well not exist at all.

We can write many more positive remarks about the general upscaling process, which raises lower resolutions to the native 4K matrix. The image after upscaling looks really decent – it is neither overly jagged nor artificially smoothed. In this particular matter, the M95E simply performs well.

The C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p material looks surprisingly decent – a considerable amount of detail is retained, and the algorithm adds a slight "rounding" effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. The performance in smoothing tonal transitions is less impressive. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a rather raw state. With older material, this can be quite tiring, as the lack of additional processing highlights any imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

6.5/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

In terms of motion fluidity and blur, our feelings are quite mixed, as the M95E is a paradox of a television. Let's start with absolute admiration: at the heart of the device is a 144Hz panel, but what truly impresses is its performance with 120Hz content, which is crucial for sports and console gaming. We must state with full responsibility that Haier has equipped this television with one of the best VA panels currently available on the market regarding the minimisation of blur. It is rare to encounter an LCD panel that offers such clean, sharp, and ghosting-free motion. In this respect, the M95E is simply phenomenal.

And that is precisely why the unpleasant surprise that awaits us on the software side is so painful. It turns out that this fantastic hardware potential is completely underutilised, as the television practically offers no effective options for improving fluidity. The motion smoothing systems that should assist with lower frame-rate content can indeed be found in the Menu, but they essentially do not respond to our settings. The conclusion is brutally simple: if you intend to watch high-fluidity material, you must be sure that the source is broadcasting it at native 120. In every other case, you must accept a rather raw, stuttering image, as the M95E will do nothing to smooth it out.

C69KS offers a simplified motion enhancement panel in films, allowing the adjustment of effect intensity with a slider. This makes it easy to match fluidity to personal preferences. The ability to use higher refresh rates is also a plus – although the panel operates natively at 4K at 60 Hz, lowering the resolution to 1440p enables 120 and 144 Hz modes, both on consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, however, in practice, the image at these settings exhibits significant motion blur. The effect is so pronounced that the overall presentation appears merely average and loses its appeal for everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

7.5/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

When it comes to features for gamers, the Haier M95E presents some very strong arguments. First of all, it is fully ready for the new generation of consoles and powerful PCs. It is equipped with two full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports, which seamlessly handle 4K signals at 120Hz, and even allow for gameplay at 144Hz. This is the foundation that guarantees us the full use of the potential of our gear. Moreover, the key technologies work flawlessly here. The television flawlessly detects the console and automatically switches to low latency mode (ALLM), so we don’t have to fiddle with the settings. The frame synchronization (VRR) works just as efficiently, eliminating annoying screen tearing when game fluidity slightly drops. Considering the incredibly low motion blur of the panel, which we have already mentioned, the M95E creates a really comfortable and responsive gaming environment. Of course, this is not a perfect package. A dedicated "Game Bar," which is a handy menu for gamers, would be useful, but this is essentially just a nice addition. A more serious failing is the lack of support for the HGiG standard, which complicates the perfect HDR configuration on the console and may lead to overexposures. Despite these shortcomings, the basic "gaming" set that the M95E offers is really solid and fully functional.

If we overlook the smudging and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS impresses with how well it performs during gaming. We get everything one can expect from a gaming television: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a well-functioning HGiG. The television can also operate at 120 and even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, allowing for smoother gameplay on a console or PC. Additionally, there is a clear Game Bar that lets you quickly glance at key settings while gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a really successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
17 ms
9 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
16 ms
9 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
16 ms
9 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
20 ms
9 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms

The key parameter for every gamer, often more important than colours or contrast, is responsiveness. In this category, the Haier M95E pulls no punches. The input lag we measured for the 120Hz signal was below 10 milliseconds. This places it among the absolute market leaders, ranking this model on par with dedicated gaming monitors. In practice, this means an instant response to every movement of the controller, keyboard, or mouse.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, making reactions in games instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

6.6/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
No
No
Font clarity
Poor
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
8ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review Haier M95E Compatibility with PC
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Compatibility with PC

As a PC gaming monitor, the M95E performs really well. It has full support for 144Hz, there is VRR, and consequently, it also works with G-Sync. In this regard – excellent. Perhaps that is why our "average" rating in this category surprises you. The reason is simple: while it excels at gaming, its performance for regular text work is not as good. At 120Hz or 144Hz settings, the TV's ability to display text is, frankly, poor. The text is blurry, and the coloured letters are smeared due to a lack of full Chroma 4:4:4 support. Interestingly, there is a solution – simply switch the computer to 60Hz mode and everything returns to normal, with the fonts becoming sharp. The only problem is that it forces us to constantly juggle settings every time we want to stop gaming and do a bit of work.

Aside from the aforementioned possibility of working at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor — the darkest ones have a distinct, rainbow glow, and standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that working on the computer for an extended period can be simply exhausting.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
76%
80%

The issue of viewing angles is not surprising here – they are simply poor. The Haier M95E uses a VA type panel, so as you move away from the screen's axis, the image quickly loses colour saturation, and the contrast appears noticeably pale. However, this is a typical and fully expected characteristic of this technology, so it's hard to regard it as a significant disadvantage – this type of panel is just like that.

The viewing angles in C6KS are very poor, typical of VA matrices. It is a compromise that we pay for by choosing high contrast — the image looks good straight on, but any significant deviation causes rapid drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

8.5/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good
Review Haier M95E Daytime performance
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Daytime performance
Review Haier M95E Daytime performance
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

Haier M95E: 1039 cd/m2

If you are looking for a television for a bright living room, the Haier M95E is one of the stronger contenders. Its performance in daytime conditions is mainly thanks to its very high brightness. In SDR mode, the panel achieves an average of over 1000 nits, which is a result that allows it to easily "break through" the light entering the room, even in very challenging conditions. And although the M95E does not have some revolutionary, super-matte anti-reflective coating, its raw backlight power is more than sufficient to perform excellently as a screen for daytime viewing.

The C6KS performs really well as a television viewing screen during the day. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits allows it to easily cut through more challenging lighting conditions. Additionally, the satin finish effectively suppresses reflections. As a result, the television proves to be surprisingly solid during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
RTM9.241015.206
Image processor
MT5889 2gb RAM
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Haier M95E TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

Haier M95E

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

TV features

3.6/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    No
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    No
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

Classic Features of the M95E

When it comes to the classic features of the television, the M95E is, to put it mildly, disappointing. The only real plus in this category is that we at least get a remote control included, although this too has a rather awkward shape and is not among the most comfortable to use. The real trouble began when we tried to search for terrestrial TV channels – the receiver stubbornly refused to connect to any antenna throughout the testing period. To be sure, we checked the same setup on another television, where everything worked perfectly, which rules out any fault on our part. Overall, apart from the fact that it has Bluetooth and a physical mini-jack headphone output, it's hard to praise the M95E for much here.

Operating System: Google TV

Alright, you might be wondering, what about the Smart features? After all, Google TV is a system that offers remarkable capabilities. That’s true, generally speaking. And indeed, the M95E boasts the same vast library of applications and access to a voice assistant as any other manufacturer. However, this is where the advantages of this system in the tested model come to an end. On our unit, the software simply operated clumsily. We encountered frustrating bugs, and the entire interface regularly experienced slight lags at the most inopportune moments, which effectively discouraged us from using it.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It's an environment that offers a lot — ideal for those who prioritise a wide selection of applications and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing, and the voice assistant work very well here, making everyday use of the television simply comfortable.

The support for traditional television looks somewhat weaker. Users who are counting on advanced "television" features may feel overlooked. Aside from the efficiently functioning Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Playing files from USB

9.5/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

In such an unpolished and clunky system, we did not expect any positive surprises. However, the built-in USB file player turned out to be a real gem. To our surprise, the application worked smoothly and handled the playback of all the most important formats we threw at it flawlessly. It is one of the few elements of the M95E software that seems to work exactly as it should.

The system player really performs well and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hitch occurs with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g. HEIC) – here TCL simply gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own application, e.g. VLC. This way, you can quickly fill in the gaps of the factory player and run virtually any material, customising the TV to your liking.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

9.2/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    87dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

After all this enumeration of shortcomings and wasted potential, we move on to a category that is like a breath of fresh air. The sound on the Haier M95E is simply phenomenal. We can confidently state that it is one of the best-sounding televisions to have graced our editorial office this year. The integrated soundbar, proudly positioned at the front, plays really clearly and evenly, serving us distinct dialogues and selective high tones. The real magic also comes from the back of the casing – that’s where two additional subwoofers are located, providing a surprisingly strong and enjoyable bass experience. Of course, we will be realists. We are still talking about the capabilities of the speakers built into the television, and there can be no comparison with a decent external audio system. Nevertheless, as far as integrated solutions go, the M95E sounds really very good and leaves most of the competition far behind.

The TCL C6KS performs practically identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same speaker set branded by Onkyo. For a television of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even sense a slightly defined bass, which is not often found in budget segments. However, it is worth keeping the proper perspective. This bass is quite decent compared to other televisions, but a home cinema system or even a basic soundbar will still offer a significantly fuller, more dynamic sound. Therefore, the C6KS will be suitable for regular television viewing, but if someone is looking for a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be the natural choice.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data