Haier K85F vs Samsung S85F (WOLED)

Direct comparison

K85F / K85FUX

S85F / FAU / FAE

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 65”77”83”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.4

7.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.2

    7.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.2

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.6

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.4

    8.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.1

    5.3

  • Utility functions

    5.5

    7.3

  • Apps

    9.6

    8.7

  • Sound quality

    4.8

    7.2

Advantages

  • Low input lag, excellent for gaming

  • Surprisingly good media player via USB

  • High contrast and decent black levels (VA panel)

  • Good text readability in PC monitor mode

  • Presence of gaming features: ALLM and VRR

  • Access to numerous applications thanks to GoogleTV

  • Revolutionary black and contrast

  • Great picture in SDR and HDR content after calibration

  • Very good motion fluidity – 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of features for gamers: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps

  • Advanced and smoothly operating Tizen system

  • Solar Remote with multiple capabilities

Disadvantages

No like
  • Catastrophic image quality in HDR mode

  • Low quality of workmanship and fitting of materials

  • Slow, stuttering and poorly translated Google TV system

  • Very poor sound quality from the built-in speakers

  • Problematic remote control (and no batteries included)

  • Poor viewing angles

  • Low brightness and weak anti-reflective coating

  • Low colour gamut coverage

  • No recording function on USB and PiP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • No HGiG* function

  • Worse viewing angles, colour gamut coverage and lower brightness than the variant with QD-OLED panel

*This function disappeared with software update 1110.7 – we are monitoring this situation regularly.

Our verdict

The debut of the Haier brand in the European television market with the K85F model feels hurried, and after thorough testing, it seems almost unfinished. Analyzing this product leads us to a fundamental conclusion: its biggest problem is not the quality of the panel used. This, considering the price segment, is simply average, with the typical advantages of VA technology in the form of high contrast and equally typical disadvantages, such as poor viewing angles. What truly disqualifies this model as a home entertainment centre is the glaring lack of engineering refinement and, above all, software development. The list of shortcomings is long and starts from the very first contact with the device. Sloppy assembly, which could have been avoided during quality control, a poorly optimised and badly translated Google TV system, or annoying issues with basic functions like pairing the remote – all contribute to the picture of a product that seems to have been released to market without due diligence. The catastrophic image quality in HDR mode, resulting not only from low brightness but also from a complete lack of intelligent adaptation to the signal, only adds to this disappointing picture. However, it turns out that this model has a surprising second face. One needs to look at it not through the lens of a home television, but rather as a large and inexpensive display for special tasks. Then its shortcomings become less important, and unexpected advantages come to the fore: a fantastically working media player with USB, remarkable font readability from a PC, and access to a vast application database. In this role – as a screen in a conference room, hotel lobby, or simple advertising player – the Haier K85F performs surprisingly well. For the typical user looking for a reliable and simply well-functioning television for the living room in 2025, however, the Haier K85F is a proposal that is incredibly difficult to recommend with a clear conscience. It is a product full of contradictions, which fails in its primary, intended function on too many fronts.

The Samsung S85F in the tested version with a WOLED panel is a television that must be judged primarily in light of its price. True to organic technology, it offers perfect, almost ideal blacks and infinite contrast in cinematic conditions. This feature alone will impress the majority of buyers, especially those upgrading from any LCD television. However, it cannot be denied that in a direct comparison with the 55-inch QD-OLED variant, the WOLED version shows some weaknesses. It is slightly darker, particularly in bright full-screen scenes, and offers noticeably poorer viewing angles. Nonetheless, the other advantages remain intact. Motion fluidity is at a high level—the 120 Hz panel handles both sports and action films excellently. And if someone plans to connect a console to the S85F, they will enjoy a full set of benefits: low input lag, variable refresh rate, Game Bar, and full HDMI 2.1 support. In everyday use, the Tizen system assisted us—closed, yet extremely polished. It responds quickly, offers a rich selection of apps, and features like AirPlay and voice control make it hard to find anything more complete in this category. Indeed, the S85F in the WOLED variant is not a perfect television and yields to its sibling with the QD-OLED panel. However, its biggest weapon is its absurdly low price. The purchase cost is downright laughable in relation to the capabilities offered. It is still a great and, above all, inexpensive OLED that will be one of the best and most cost-effective televisions on the market for a vast array of users.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Toslink (Optical audio)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.6/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,550:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,400:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,500:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail
Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Well then, let’s get to the point, which is how the Haier K85F handles black levels and contrast. The key information is that the television uses a VA panel, which has a significant impact on the image quality in dark scenes. It is precisely because of this that the contrast is really solid – our measurements showed values around 5000:1, which is much better than that of popular IPS panels.

However, one must remember that we are talking about equipment from the lower price range. Therefore, one cannot expect any advanced technologies, such as local dimming. The backlighting works across the entire surface of the screen all the time. How did this look during viewing? We took the film “Oblivion” with its cosmic landscapes for a test, and also checked classic black bars in other productions. The effect was quite decent. The black had good depth, but it was not perfectly pitch black – a subtle, navy blue glow could be seen, indicating that the panel's backlighting was still active.

When it comes to blacks and contrast, we must be honest – this is the area where the differences between QD-OLED and WOLED panels are virtually non-existent under typical cinematic conditions. We confirm with full responsibility: the Samsung S85F equipped with a WOLED panel achieves amazing and unparalleled results in this respect. Regardless of the scene being watched – whether it's a dynamic action movie or a dark thriller – we receive infinite contrast and perfect black that we expect from any OLED television. These are results that can impress even the most discerning cinephiles. It is worth emphasizing that such deep, absolute black can only be offered by televisions with organic panels. In cinematic conditions, as we see in our measurements, the level of black luminance is zero. So, if you dream of a screen that can "switch off" the light in a scene just as effectively as an independent cinema in a dark room, we are pleased to state that the S85F, also in the WOLED variant, is one of those televisions.

HDR effect quality

3.4/10

5.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 81.8%, Bt.2020: 61.4%
DCI P3: 97.0%, Bt.2020: 70.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

217 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

273 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

672 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

673 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

718 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

670 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

276 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Haier K85F HDR effect quality
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Haier K85F HDR effect quality
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Haier K85F HDR effect quality
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S85F (WOLED)

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

Haier K85F

HDR luminance

Let’s now turn to one of the hottest topics in the world of televisions, namely the quality of HDR effect. In the case of the Haier K85F model, we must unfortunately make it clear: if you are looking for equipment to watch content in a wide dynamic range, you should avoid this model at all costs. The main problem is its very low peak brightness, which during our tests barely reached 250 nits. To give you a better idea of what that means – such a value is fine for watching standard SDR content, but it is absolutely insufficient to showcase any real benefits of HDR. The image simply lacks the "power" to generate bright, striking highlights. All our measurements and tests on specialist patterns only confirmed this. As if that weren't enough, the television also struggles with colour reproduction. In this budget build, we won't find any technologies to expand the colour palette, such as quantum dot layers (marketed as "QLED"). As a result, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space, which is crucial for HDR materials, is only around 80%. In practice, this means that the image will not only be dark but also devoid of the vibrant, saturated colours that the director wanted to show us.

For the majority of the time, let's say in 90% of film scenes, viewers will see virtually no difference between the versions of the S85F. When small, but very bright light points appear on the screen – a lantern in a dark alley, an explosion, the sun breaking through the clouds – this WOLED panel (similar to the smaller S85F) performs exceptionally well. Our measurements indicated a peak brightness of around 750 nits. We can state with full confidence: this is a great result that guarantees fantastic HDR effects. The problem arises in a very specific, uncomfortable situation for any OLED. We're talking about the moment when the entire screen must light up at full power brightly. Examples include a scene with a white background, a skiing scene, or our test sequences (5) from the film The Meg. And here, unfortunately, the results diverge significantly to the detriment of the variant with the WOLED panel. Our measurement equipment was able to register a maximum brightness of around 250 to 300 nits in such conditions. To be clear: the same model with a QD-OLED panel in the same test is nearly twice as bright. The second matter: colours. And here, we also have to be honest – QD-OLED has a structural advantage. Why? It's simple. QD-OLED generates colours from three components (red, green, and blue) and does not require an additional white subpixel. The WOLED panel we are testing here uses that white subpixel mainly to boost overall brightness. The effect is that QD-OLED is able to show a slightly wider colour palette and the colours are somewhat "purer". But to be clear: it's not that the colours on this WOLED panel are bad! On the contrary, they are really very good. The coverage of the DCI-P3 film palette at 97% and 71% for the broader BT.2020 palette is still high-end. We just need to honestly admit that this few percentage points of advantage in colour coverage lies with QD-OLED technology and may be noticeable in very specific moments.

Factory color reproduction

3.8/10

5.5/10

Review Haier K85F Factory color reproduction
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Well, how does the television perform with colours straight out of the box, without any interference from our side? The Haier K85F offers a full range of picture modes, such as Dynamic and Eco, but for anyone who wants to watch films according to the creators' intentions, only one really matters: Film mode. That is where we focused our tests, and unfortunately, its name has little to do with reality. The picture in the factory settings is very far from what we could call cinematic fidelity and requires numerous adjustments. Let's start with the white balance, which has a noticeable deficiency of red. In practice, this means that the entire image has a cool, bluish tint. The situation is even worse regarding brightness management, namely the gamma curve (for SDR) and EOTF (for HDR). Their graph resembles a real rollercoaster, which has a disastrous impact on the viewing experience. This results in unnatural dimming of SDR content, causing details in shadows to be lost, and in the case of HDR – excessive brightness, which further exacerbates the issue of clipping. Such a combination, namely too cool white combined with chaotic brightness and excessive blue saturation, results in significant errors in colour reproduction. Our measurements on the specialist ColorChecker chart revealed errors (Delta E) regularly reaching and exceeding values of 8-9. Put simply, errors above the threshold of 3 are already easily noticeable to the naked eye, so such a result means that the colours on the screen are simply heavily distorted.

When it comes to factory colour reproduction, our test sample in SDR mode suffered from a slight deficit of red and yellow colours. This resulted in a faint yellowish tint visible in shades of white. However, this is not the biggest problem with the S85F. As with the variant with a QD-OLED panel, the main issue with this model is the way it presents HDR content. When we look at the EOTF curve chart, it is easy to see that the television has quite significant problems with strong image clipping. Such behaviour causes the final image in many scenes to become very unnatural.

Color reproduction after calibration

6.2/10

9/10

Review Haier K85F Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier K85F Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Color reproduction after calibration

Well, is there anything that can be done about this picture? Can professional calibration save the situation? The answer is both yes and no. It must be clearly stated that there are certain limitations we cannot overcome. The constraints of the design itself, meaning simply a poor panel and its narrow colour coverage, make it impossible to expect a reasonable HDR effect – we won't mislead you on that. The biggest beneficiary of our adjustments is undoubtedly the SDR mode, and it is indeed for watching such content, after calibration, that this television starts to make sense. We managed to somewhat tame the white balance. Although the television only offers basic 2-point adjustment (rather than precise 20-point), so it's not perfect, we successfully eliminated that unpleasant, cold "chill" in the picture. Above all, however, we noted a significant improvement in brightness management. The gamma curve, which previously resembled a rollercoaster, looks like an almost perfectly straight line after calibration. This is a sign that the television can finally display images without artificially dimming or brightening them. The conclusion is simple: even with such a cheap television, professional adjustment of the settings can achieve a lot and extract the maximum potential from it.

After conducting calibration in Filmmaker mode, we managed to eliminate most of the unwanted effects. In SDR content, the television performs excellently, with its colour reproduction errors not exceeding a value of 2, which is an outstanding result. HDR content looks slightly worse, though still very good. Although we were able to eliminate the significant unnaturalness of the image caused by the excessively high EOTF curve, the most discerning observers may notice that it is not perfectly aligned. It runs slightly below the reference curve, which would suggest that the S85F has minor difficulties in showcasing all the details in the image. We must emphasise here that it is very unlikely that the average viewer will notice any shortcomings in the image. The final effect after calibration is evaluated as exemplary.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.6/10

7.3/10

Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions

It’s time to address a matter that goes unnoticed by many, but can be very irritating to the discerning (and not just) eye. We are talking about the fluidity of tonal transitions, or how smoothly the screen displays transitions between very similar shades of a single colour – for example, on a clear blue sky. We must admit that in this category, the Haier K85F performs quite decently considering its price. In bright scenes, such as the aforementioned sky or vast landscapes in the film "The Martian", there are no strong, distinct bands. Indeed, if you look closely, you will notice minimal imperfections, but generally, the effect is more than satisfactory. However, the situation changes when darker scenes appear on the screen, such as murky corridors in games or night landscapes. Here, banding, or the posterisation effect, becomes much more visible. Transitions in shadows and greys are no longer as smooth and can irritate the more sensitive eye. It’s not a level that would completely disqualify the television, but it’s clear that this is an area where costs have been cut.

Another drawback of the S85F version with the WOLED panel, noticeable compared to the QD-OLED variant, is the quality of the fluidity of tonal transitions. In very bright moments, it is evident that the colour blending is not perfect, and sometimes it can be spotted with the naked eye. Although the overall quality of gradients is still good, certain issues with the panel produced by LG Displays are apparent, which are not as noticeable in competing panels (QD-OLED).

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

4/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Haier K85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Haier K85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Let's move on to digital processing and image scaling, specifically how the Haier K85F handles lower resolution signals, such as those from standard television. Right from the start, we encounter an extremely annoying and completely incomprehensible issue – overscan that is enabled by default. This means that the television artificially enlarges the image, cropping its edges, and this happens on every source, even 1080p. To see the full frame, you have to dig through the screen settings each time and manually switch the format to "expand to 16:9". It's a detail, but it's devilishly frustrating. The very act of scaling content to 4K resolution can be summed up in one word: acceptable. And that's about it. The image processor does not strip details from the picture, nor does it generate jagged edges or other artifacts. It simply does its job, without any fireworks. It's alright, but nothing more. However, the biggest and most noticeable shortcoming in the digital processing section is the absence of a smooth tonal transition feature. This is an algorithm that could significantly reduce the annoying banding effect we mentioned earlier. Unfortunately, the manufacturer did not provide such a solution, condemning us to watch the imperfections of the panel and low-quality materials in full view.

The processing of tonal transitions (gradients) in the S85F is at a high level. The television effectively handles posterisation (the "banding" effect of colours), even with heavily compressed content, e.g., from streaming services. However, using this feature requires a certain compromise. We noticed that the noise reduction algorithm is quite aggressive – even at the lowest setting, it can eliminate natural film grain, which for many viewers is part of the film's aesthetics. The "Standard" setting seems to be a happy medium, not causing a noticeable loss of important details, which is why we can recommend it. However, we advise against using the "High" level, which, in addition to noise, also removes desirable details such as texture or structure of objects on the screen.

The upscaling process of lower resolution content works very well in the S85F. The image is sharpened and clear. The only minor imperfection we managed to observe is occasional, subtle aliasing on the edges. The television still exhibits characteristics typical of this manufacturer, namely active "overscan" (slight image enlargement). It is worth keeping this in mind, especially when watching older content, as it may result in minimal clipping of the original frame.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
-
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
50%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

The matrix in the K85F model operates at a native refresh rate of 60 Hz, which right from the start sets certain expectations regarding image fluidity. However, we must admit that we were very positively surprised when we found two separate sliders for motion control in the settings menu: one labelled as "Motion Blur Reduction" and the other "De-Judder". Such generosity in this price segment is an absolute rarity, as typically manufacturers offer at most one shared option. Unfortunately, our enthusiasm waned as quickly as it appeared. It soon became clear why Haier was so "generous" – the slider responsible for motion blur reduction is simply a dummy. Its adjustment brings absolutely no visible effect on the screen, so only one of the two options works.

S85F is a model with impressive speed. The use of a 120 Hz OLED panel ensures that dynamic scenes, both in games and during sports broadcasts, meet expectations: smoothly, sharply, and without loss of clarity. A key role here is played by the instant response time of the pixels, which is a natural advantage of OLED technology. Frame transitions are instantaneous, and the image remains clear even during the fastest camera movements. Moving objects, such as a ball on the pitch or a car in a chase scene, are clear and devoid of the characteristic motion blur associated with LCD panels (the so-called "ghosting").

Console compatibility and gaming features

4/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

Let's move on to features for gamers, although we must emphasise at the outset that this is more of a proposal for the "casual" ones. The manufacturer boasts in the specifications about the presence of HDMI 2.1 ports, which looks impressive on paper, but in reality, it is largely a marketing ploy. What good is a modern port if the heart of the television is a panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz? It physically cannot display a signal at 120 frames per second, even at lower resolutions, which deprives the HDMI 2.1 port of its most significant advantage. It's a shame. (That’s why we mark it as HDMI 2.0 in our tests). Another curious peculiarity is the television's reaction to attempts to calibrate HDR from the console level. Changes to brightness settings cause very unnatural image behaviour, which might suggest an incorrect implementation of the HGiG standard. To be honest, however, one shouldn't worry too much about this, because as we've mentioned numerous times, we simply do not recommend using any HDR content on this screen. However, to avoid being too negative, the Haier K85F also has two significant and unexpected advantages. The first is the presence of ALLM, or Auto Low Latency Mode, which switches the television to low latency mode as soon as it detects a connected console. The second, even bigger surprise, is support for VRR, or Variable Refresh Rate. While it works within a very modest range of 48-60 Hz, its mere presence is commendable. As a result, the image in games can experience less "tearing," which significantly improves the gaming experience.

The 85F has practically everything on board to become the dream screen for gaming. It features four full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, support for VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode). Additionally, there's a super-detailed Game Bar, which clearly shows all the key parameters. However, the real gem is the Game Motion Plus feature. This motion smoother dedicated to games makes the animation more visually pleasing, while only slightly increasing input lag. This is a rare and well-functioning combination for which Samsung deserves great applause.

Now comes the moment where we must do a bit of complaining. The lack of Dolby Vision in Samsung TVs has become standard, so there's no point in hoping (unless something changes in the future). Unfortunately, it is much harder to explain the disappearance of support for HGiG after one of the software updates. HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) is a key mode that allows for accurate reproduction of brightness in HDR games, according to the creators' intent. Without it, HDR calibration on the console becomes less precise, which can lead to an image that is too dark in the shadows or overly washed out in bright areas. Perhaps Samsung will fix this in the next update – we have high hopes for that. Because if HGiG returns, the S85F will become an almost perfect television for gamers.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
10 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV

We must, however, give Haier its due – there is one parameter in which this television absolutely shines and embarrasses many more expensive models. We are speaking about input lag, or signal delay. Our measurements showed an impressively low result of just 13 ms. This is a huge plus that makes gaming controls lightning-fast and incredibly responsive. In this regard, the K85F performs excellently.

In this category, the S85F shows its true colours. The values measured by us – 5 ms for 120 Hz content and around 10 ms for 60 Hz – are results that can be described in one word in the world of televisions: phenomenal. This means that the response to a player's movements is practically instantaneous. Pressing a button on the pad results in action on the screen without any noticeable delay. In dynamic games, where a fraction of a second determines victory or defeat, such values make a huge difference. There is no question of a nervous "waiting" for the image to catch up with our commands. The S85F provides a sense of complete control – and that's how it should be in equipment aspiring to be the perfect screen for gamers.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RWGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes
Review Haier K85F Compatibility with PC
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Compatibility with PC

And what if you tried using this Haier as a monitor for your computer? Here, to our great surprise, the television performs remarkably well. For office work – it is ideal. This is all thanks to its proper support for what is known as chroma subsampling 4:4:4. In plain terms: every, even the smallest letter on the screen is sharp, without annoying coloured outlines or blurring. Of course, let's be straightforward – this is not equipment for PC gamers. 60 Hz is too little for them. But if you simply need a large screen for text work, browsing the internet, coding, or displaying presentations, the K85F will excel in this role. This is one of its strongest and, to be honest, most unexpected applications.

And what about connecting to a computer? We rush to answer: the S85F performs excellently in this regard. The combination of lightning-fast input lag and a 120 Hz panel is the recipe for successful gaming on a PC. Both fast-paced shooters and calmer RPG titles benefit from the instant response and fluidity of animation, which can immerse you for long hours. Of course, it’s not perfect. We must mention the specific construction of the WOLED panel. It consists of four subpixels (WRGB), which is a different structure from the classic RGB known from monitors. As a result, if we sit very close to the screen, we may notice that the fonts are not as perfectly sharp as we would like them to be. However, this is not a major issue and shouldn't interfere with everyday use. Especially since the television correctly supports a 4:4:4 chroma signal.

Viewing angles

2.8/10

7.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
67%
29%

At almost the very end of the assessment of the panel itself, we left the viewing angles, which unfortunately are one of its biggest weaknesses. However, it must be honestly admitted that this is no surprise – it is simply a natural and commonly known characteristic of VA-type panels. In the specimen we tested, interestingly, the brightness of the image did not drop dramatically when we moved away from the centre of the screen. The real problem, however, lies in the colours, which start to fade instantly. A slight change in position on the sofa is enough for the colours to lose their saturation and become washed out. In this respect, the Haier K85F presents a rather mediocre level, typical for this technology.

As befits OLED technology, the viewing angles on the S85F are very good. The image retains its properties even when viewed from the side, which is a clear advantage over most LCD televisions. However, we must note that this is not the level known from QD-OLED panels. In the case of the tested WOLED panel, with a significant deviation from the screen axis, a slight decrease in brightness and a subtle change in white tones can be observed. QD-OLED remains unparalleled in this respect, offering an almost perfect picture regardless of the angle from which we view it.

Daytime performance

4.1/10

5.3/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good
Review Haier K85F Daytime performance
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Daytime performance
Review Haier K85F Daytime performance
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Samsung S85F (WOLED): 305 cd/m2

Haier K85F: 276 cd/m2

And how does the television perform in confrontation with daylight, for example in a brightly sunlit living room? Unfortunately, we do not have good news here. As we have already established, it is a television with relatively low brightness, which becomes a serious drawback when faced with sunlight. The situation is further worsened by the screen coating used. Instead of effectively suppressing reflections, its satin structure tends to unfavourably scatter them. In practice, this means that the reflection of a window or lamp turns into a large, blurred, milky halo, which degrades contrast and effectively hinders viewing. The conclusion is therefore clear: if the television is to be placed in a bright room, the K85F model will not be a good choice.

We must state clearly that working in a brightly lit room is not the strong point of the S85F. We are dealing with a rather moderately bright OLED panel here. Our measurements indicated that the average screen brightness in "TV" mode hovers around 300 nits. For some users, this may be a value that is too low, particularly in rooms with a lot of daylight. Of course, this television would be perfect for moderately bright living rooms. However, it is not a model we would recommend for exceptionally bright, heavily sunlit interiors. This problem is exacerbated by the anti-reflective coating applied. We noticed that it does not suppress reflections from the surroundings as effectively as the version with the QD-OLED panel, especially when direct sunlight hits the screen.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
Software version during testing
UKN2.241219.053
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1110.7
Image processor
mt5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Haier K85F TV Panel details
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV Panel details

Haier K85F

Samsung S85F (WOLED)

TV features

5.5/10

7.3/10

  • HDMI inputs
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features

GoogleTV on Haier K85F

The heart of the television is the Google TV system, which in theory should be its huge advantage. Access to thousands of applications and a wealth of features are promises we are familiar with. Unfortunately, in Haier's execution, it is one of the worst implementations of this software we have encountered. The system runs painfully slowly, and the interface is notoriously unresponsive. However, the real nightmare is the incorrect and often downright comical translations of some menu options, making it difficult at times to understand what is even being referred to. To make matters worse, during our testing, we were unable to activate the AirPlay function, which simply did not work.

Classic features on Haier K85F

Let's move on to the classic features and connections, as this is where the story gets even more interesting. The rich array of ports is definitely a plus, including four HDMI ports and a rarely seen mini-jack headphone output. Unfortunately, the television does not offer either USB recording or PiP mode. However, the real ordeal begins with the remote control. Our first attempts to pair it via Bluetooth to activate radio frequency (RF) control and voice functions ended in total failure. After dozens of attempts, we were sure it was just a manufacturing defect. And here's the surprise: after a long struggle, we discovered that the remote could be paired, but it had to be done from the native Google TV settings, completely bypassing the non-functioning Haier overlay. This is a perfect example of how terrible software can ruin basic functionality. Oh, and one more thing. In the box... there weren't even any batteries for the remote.

Features of the Classic S85F Television

The S85F was not really designed with fans of traditional television in mind. We won’t find the PiP feature here (which is somewhat surprising, as Samsung usually offers it) nor the ability to record programmes onto USB from the built-in tuners. Fortunately, the basics are there – teletext and a clear channel guide – so this is perfectly sufficient for everyday viewing. The included remote, although simple at first glance and lacking a number pad, allows control of multiple devices. This way, when connecting a Canal+ decoder, you won't need to have two remotes on the table – one from the television will suffice.

SmartTV S85F: Tizen

The smart part is a completely different story. Tizen is one of the most advanced operating systems in televisions. It operates smoothly and supports all popular internet features – from screen mirroring, to AirPlay, to voice search. The strongest point of Tizen is its integration with the SmartThings app, which can serve as a control centre for the entire home. Of course, like any closed system, Tizen has its limitations – for example, it has a smaller library of applications than GoogleTV. However, looking at the current list of available applications, it is hard to point out anything that might actually be missing.

Playing files from USB

9.4/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

After all our complaints about the unfinished software, the moment came when we experienced absolute shock. It turns out that in this buggy and slow-operating system there is a function hidden that works almost perfectly and puts industry veterans to shame. We are talking about the built-in media player for files from USB drives. It is a true multimedia powerhouse that played virtually every video format we threw at it – from the most popular to the completely niche. Haier, a newcomer in the TV market, has achieved something that many manufacturers with decades of experience have struggled with for years. Who knows, perhaps it was originally intended to be a reliable player for conference rooms? Regardless of its origin, the result is excellent!

The built-in media player in the S85F performs excellently – practically everything you put on a pendrive or hard drive will be played without the slightest problem. Small shortcomings occur only in the support of some less popular photo formats, but for the vast majority of you, this will be more than sufficient. Therefore, it can be confidently said that the built-in player is more than solid for home use.

Apps

9.6/10

8.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

4.8/10

7.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    83dB
    80dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

When it comes to sound, the review will unfortunately be very brief. The biggest advantage of the built-in speakers of the K85F is really just that they are there and produce sound. Other than that, the sound is completely flat, devoid of any bass, and simply anemic. Yes, on the TV's box, we will find the Dolby Atmos logo, but when faced with the physical capabilities of these drivers, it is a feature that exists only on paper. The verdict can, therefore, only be one: when planning to purchase this television, you should immediately add a soundbar to your budget.

The built-in speakers with 20 W power on paper may not seem impressive, but in practice, the S85F can surprise. It sounds really pleasant, and at times you can even catch a hint of bass, which is not a given in this class of speakers. The television does not support the DTS format, which has unfortunately become the standard for most manufacturers by 2025. A nice surprise, however, is the support for Dolby Atmos. Of course, to talk about "spatial" sound with two speakers placed at the bottom of the casing would be a slight exaggeration, but it is good that Samsung offers such a feature in this model at all.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

83dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data